What's new

Hindus the real minorities in their own mother land India.

Hindus and Muslims are two sides to the same coin: they both claim to be victims when facts show otherwise.

What about the Indus Valley Civilization?

The only religion that is actually native to India and wholly developed in house is Sikhism. The rest all came in.

Buddhism and Jainism are also native.
 
.
Hinduism originated in India, post-Indus Valley Civilization (part of which was in modern day India, anyway)

Jainism also originated in India
It may have "originated", but it wasnt a pure origin.. it was due to the vedic religion of the Indo Aryans who migrated into India. It wasnt "of the soil".. but rather an immigrant idea that evolved to accommodate with the land.
 
.
I am so tired of these Hindutvas who moan and b!tch everyday about how Hindus have been suffering since independence. That too when they elected Hindu leaders to govern India in the past. The best solution would be to carve out a Hindu state for them where they can create a land of milk and honey without moaning and groaning about minorities everyday. Then they can fcuk off and leave the rest of India to progress in peace as a secular united nation !

If that's the case your name was given to you in the past . So you want to keep changing your name everyday ?

This is our identify . What is wrong telling the truth . My simple question . European celebrate and spread their newly formed civilisation which a midget when compared to timeline of Indian Civilisation . So why can't teach our kids the truth in History subjects instead of How Rome was built and stuff .
 
.
@Reashot Xigwin

superb signature. :D you have my support. :tup:

Thank you human I will kill.. I mean reward you after we take over the world.
cats___world_domination_by_yamiikarus-d4us7j5.png
 
.
How this country don't belongs to Hindus ? And people were not hindu when every single Kingdom of Indian subcontinent worshiped hindu gods.

The name hindu might be new . But the culture and way of life remained the same for many 10000s of years. I gave you a small example of Dwaraka which got sunk in 24000 BCE . Latest scientific evidence are there. If a civilisation which was ruled by Hindu God Krishna was found to be sunken before 26000 years ago near gujarat . Then how come India is not a Hindu nation ? And why people wr not Hindus


Kindly explain your logic. This is my point . Look what you are doing . Trying to fake our nations history just because minorities won't like it ?

Your logic is based on usual nationalistic blindness.. which even more evident with you being defensive. Sure at one point Hinduism may have been the dominant religion but it was not the case before that.. by your logic all descendants of the IVC are from their religion which makes many of your "Hindu" claims not Hindu at all but of the IVC religion.

It matters little if Krishna ruled an underwater kingdom or a pie in the sky... before Krishna there were other people before him or are you a religious nutcase who thinks there were no humans before Krishna and his times?

Thank you human I will kill.. I mean reward you after we take over the world.
cats___world_domination_by_yamiikarus-d4us7j5.png

I will gladly serve thee with my life, as you can see I am already ruled by one of your own.
05032009436.jpg
 
. .
Hindus and Muslims are two sides to the same coin: they both claim to be victims when facts show otherwise.



Buddhism and Jainism are also native.

Perhaps, but even with such sentiments.. the focus is that religion has lesser claim on land as compared to ethnic origins.
 
.
It may have "originated", but it wasnt a pure origin.. it was due to the vedic religion of the Indo Aryans who migrated into India. It wasnt "of the soil".. but rather an immigrant idea that evolved to accommodate with the land.

Your Aryan theory is been rebuffed for many years and many time now. After all Indians are and our knowledge is indigenous . These so called European itself dint exist . Since they where covered with ice until the melting of ice age . When India was one and only empire and one family . That's why Vedic Culture influenced all other religion and civilisation of the world .

Simple logic when huge inhabitants and land mass where lost to raising sea level during the ice age , new Land mass emerged . And people migrated to different part of the world and created their own language culture when time passed away .

If an Indian getting settled in US his child might have little knowledge about his father's Indian history . But his next generation after generation will have no idea of his family history . He will be an american just like other Americans . But it doesn't mean his India history is fake .

Got my point .
 
. .
Perhaps, but even with such sentiments.. the focus is that religion has lesser claim on land as compared to ethnic origins.

To be honest, religion has no claim on land. I don't think ethnic origins even have claim, land is for whoever occupies it. In the end, might is right.
 
. .
It may have "originated", but it wasnt a pure origin.. it was due to the vedic religion of the Indo Aryans who migrated into India. It wasnt "of the soil".. but rather an immigrant idea that evolved to accommodate with the land.

Does that mean anything? Many Indians are descendents of these same people and living in India. Hinduism also has roots in south, central, and east Indian ideas and concepts.

Buddhism, Sikhism, and Jainism are essentially the same thing as original hinduism that also evolved from these ideas. Why do you say that Sikhism and Jainism are "of the soil"?

Fact of the matter is that if you ask any qualified PhD, he will tell you that these are all Indian systems. The Dharmic branches are all distinctly Indian. Indus Valley Civilization was in ancient india, was in both modern day pakistan and india, and the people are from that line.

Same reason they call Buddhism Indian despite Buddha becoming enlightened in present day Nepal.
 
.
Your logic is based on usual nationalistic blindness.. which even more evident with you being defensive. Sure at one point Hinduism may have been the dominant religion but it was not the case before that.. by your logic all descendants of the IVC are from their religion which makes many of your "Hindu" claims not Hindu at all but of the IVC religion.

It matters little if Krishna ruled an underwater kingdom or a pie in the sky... before Krishna there were other people before him or are you a religious nutcase who thinks there were no humans before Krishna and his times?



I will gladly serve thee with my life, as you can see I am already ruled by one of your own.
View attachment 204544


Oscar how Hinduism were dominant religion when there wr no other religions to dominate . Today West brag about 2000 year of Christianity but these people don't go beyond that. Which will be very embarrassing . Cause these people where following idol worship and similar hindu way of worship of mithra . A pagan god . For nearly 3000 year before christ was born . What is more important is to not his birthday ! Celebrated on December 25 same like Christmas but 3000 years before christ was born . That's why they started propagation like Jesus is son of God . So who ever praying jesus started to Co vert to Christianity . Under brutality of Roman Kings . The Iranian Kingdom also idol worshipers . Peraians . Their culture is very close to Hindu way of life . Another proof of Hindu Kingdom and migration of Indian people all across the world.

Don't you think some thing is missing from our History books Oscar ? Don't we deserve to know the truth ?
 
. .
Oscar how Hinduism were dominant religion when there wr no other religions to dominate . Today West brag about 2000 year of Christianity but these people don't go beyond that. Which will be very embarrassing . Cause these people where following idol worship and similar hindu way of worship of mithra . A pagan god . For nearly 3000 year before christ was born . What is more important is to not his birthday ! Celebrated on December 25 same like Christmas but 3000 years before christ was born .

Not 3000 years, about 300 years. The Persian cult of Mithraism was taken back to Greece by the armies of Alexander & then adopted by the Romans.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom