What's new

Hindu Taqiyya

If they stop till they supported along with muslims then it's fine if u take this history lill further then Gandhi with draw support of muslim khalafat later and muslims of india continued back then Turkey get muslim volunteers and financial support of muslims just cuz hindu wants to get support from British Empire they abandoned Turkey.
Now everyone knows what's going on in india arab still remember babri masjid incident and they way they treating muslims in india. Arab can easily make india bend on their knees if they want but for now they are not involving with any conflict with any country cuz they already involve in Arab conflict. But for long run india don't have chance to involving with muslim world as muslim.
Pak sud focus on their financial terrorist once we straight our $hit out we be doing better than anyone in region. Our border security is doing great job by stopping Pakistani and afghani smuggler make afghan more vulnerable and India is trying to tease China so they can create mess in region to stop CPEC.

A brotherly word of advice to our Pakistani brothers, Your foreign policy is based on "Muslim Umma" concept, the idea that Muslim Umma is going to play the same role for you that NATO is playing for western society. But the thing you gotta know is that the Muslim Umma is much more fractured than western society in terms of linguistics, geographical, dispersion and tribalism. Muslims across the Muslims world don't speaks the same language, they don't have the same kind of Islam, some of them are very comfortable where they are they won't wanna wreck that for something like Kashmir. So in short terms, there is no such thing as Muslim Umma. Muslim Umma has died long long time ago and the Umma that you hear about is just a scheme used by GCC countries to use you as their mercenaries to fight their wars. Look at the Palestine Issue for example, there are 1.7 billion Muslims in the world and 6.1 million Jews in Israel, that makes 279 Muslim per Jew, and somehow these 1.7 billion Muslims can't get Palestine back from these Jews? Even though Al-Aqsa Mosque, the second holy place in Islam is located in there? So why do you think anybody in the Muslim Umma is going himself killed by fighting 1.3 billion people to get Kashmir back for you guys? Do you think it really matters to those GCC countries who gets the Kashmir? @KediKesenFare said India's policy won't work in the long term but he is wrong, India is clearly aimed to be a future super power, and when that happens do you really think these GCC counties that probably will have big trade relations with India at that time are going to get themselves in to trouble by backing you guys??? Being mercenary is all they want from you cause quite frankly, that's all you have to offer. Right now China, an infidel country, is more useful to you than all of the Muslim Umma and that's because they are the Indian's rivals, so they are backing you. The sooner you figure out about this Umma scheme and start rebuilding your economy and foreign relationships will be better for you.
Some of your points are absoulitly valid but Israel is in same position when muslims ruled 700 years in india by minority. Back then politics were totally different but it's related some how, numbers in policy making never matters every in human history india is run by RSS and if some one says they are in majority or mostly hindus follow their ideology then it be very wrong to label all indian as terrorist but they are in command and majority follows them.
Muslims have only problem is unity we as muslims have same religion from East to west but some hard liner either they are liberal or way around have been so successful dividing ummah. Sooner or later ummah have to realize that unity is only solution either it's now or after losing so much.
China is not supporting Pak only cuz China is against india it's cuz we solve our issues and we both stand together many other reasons aswell and we try to involve China in muslim world as much as we cud thru CPEC or any other way.
I think this hard liner ruler in india is dividing india more and more as time pass China involvement in india might hurt india to the level they will have to rage a war directly with Pak or China since they know west is with them. Which is a long term failed policy of india.
 
Sometimes, i really feel suprised by the amount of hatred for India by even sane members of the PDF...I can very well understand to get an expected hatred post from some of the posters who are known for their stance.

Here is my response to the thread posters.

1- What is your objective of this thread? Are you happy that India is trying to have good relationship with Turkey or you are upset about it.
2- Honestly speaking, expect few people in PDF, no one really try to understand, how Indian diplomacy works for other nations....We do not have any issue with any nation ( Including Pakistan) on religious ground. We do not have good relation nor bad relation with any nation for its religion....Rather Indian foreign policy always match up with its positioning as a nation to get maximum benefits with its realtion from other nation.

3- Based on OP post, India deceives Muslim nation and trying to replace Pakistan....It must be a serious joke...Do you really believe India is competing with Pakistan for prove itself as more Muslim than Pakistan...India is building relation based on its economic and political need.

4- There is a major difference between how India sees the world unlike Pakistan...Pakistan created for the sake of religion( Good for them. I hope all the best and prosperity for my neighouring nation). But India do not have that stigma to look around the world with the prism of religion. That gives us the luxury of alligning with any one that serves each other interest..That is why we absolutely have no issues in buidling relation with different nation.
 
Pakistan has vast differences with India on numerous grounds that separation would have been a necessity had partition not took place. Religion was not and never will be the stumbling block between the citizens of both countries. That's best left for another topic.

Not sure how much you're, if any, well rehearsed with the history, but Pakistan was created out of an idea for Muslims of sub continent, as long musli m are free from Hindu rule. So the idea of Islam and Pakistan separated from it is unimaginable. You would have more chances of Zionists getting kicked out of Israel than Pakistan dropping its core ideology of its existence

Only in your fictitious world is Pakistan synonymous with Islam. 'Muslims' like yourself do a splendid job everyday in trying to change that. Let's not try to distort facts, though.

Prior to partition, Jinnah, tried his utmost to separate religion from politics. Distancing himself from the Khalifat[Pan-Islamic] movement and other radical outfits while Gandhi[loved by Hindu India] was in full favour of the Khalifat movement. After the Lucknow Pact, prominent members belonging to the Hindu faith of IIM at the time and INC rightfully labelled him 'a champion of Hindu-Muslim unity'. Hardly someone who wants to play the religious card. All Jinnah wanted was to safeguard muslim interests within the country. The fanatical, Gandhi, didn't even want that.

Here's the words of your founding father:

"I cannot emphasize it too much. We should begin to work in that spirit and in course of time all these angularities of the majority and minority communities, the Hindu community and the Muslim community, because even as regards Muslims you have Pathans, Punjabis, Shias, Sunnis and so on, and among the Hindus you have Brahmins, Vashnavas, Khatris, also Bengalis, Madrasis and so on, will vanish. Indeed if you ask me, this has been the biggest hindrance in the way of India to attain the freedom and independence and but for this we would have been free people long long ago. No power can hold another nation, and specially a nation of 400 million souls in subjection; nobody could have conquered you, and even if it had happened, nobody could have continued its hold on you for any length of time, but for this. Therefore, we must learn a lesson from this. You are free; you are free to go to your temples, you are free to go to your mosques or to any other place or worship in this State of Pakistan. You may belong to any religion or caste or creed that has nothing to do with the business of the State. As you know, history shows that in England, conditions, some time ago, were much worse than those prevailing in India today. The Roman Catholics and the Protestants persecuted each other. Even now there are some States in existence where there are discriminations made and bars imposed against a particular class. Thank God, we are not starting in those days. We are starting in the days where there is no discrimination, no distinction between one community and another, no discrimination between one caste or creed and another. We are starting with this fundamental principle that we are all citizens and equal citizens of one State. The people of England in course of time had to face the realities of the situation... what exists now is that every man is a citizen, an equal citizen of Great Britain and they are all members of the Nation.

Now I think we should keep that in front of us as our ideal and you will find that in course of time Hindus would cease to be Hindus and Muslims would cease to be Muslims, not in the religious sense, because that is the personal faith of each individual, but in the political sense as citizens of the State."

It's pretty evident by his own words that Pakistan was never was supposed to be an Islamic State. It was eight years after Jinnah's death that Pakistan even was named one.

Right up until he drew his last breath, Jinnah, had nothing but love for India. After all he spent most of his life dreaming, plotting and fighting for a united India. While it was a bitter sweet pill for him, for the rest of the people it was an absolute blessing. Jinnah deserves to be remembered for what he was, an Indian patriot, the man deserves that after all he gave, Pakistan, not what the extremist elements on either side like to claim he was.

Pakistan was supposed to be a secular country inclusive to all, where muslims or anyone else regardless of their faith, caste or denomination wouldn't be marginalised. Blithering extremist like yourself will never change that, but people like yourself and the extremist elements present today go to prove that Pakistan has a long way to go in order to fulfil Jinnah's dream.
 
Last edited:
A brotherly word of advice to our Pakistani brothers, Your foreign policy is based on "Muslim Umma" concept, the idea that Muslim Umma is going to play the same role for you that NATO is playing for western society. But the thing you gotta know is that the Muslim Umma is much more fractured than western society in terms of linguistics, geographical, dispersion and tribalism. Muslims across the Muslims world don't speaks the same language, they don't have the same kind of Islam, some of them are very comfortable where they are they won't wanna wreck that for something like Kashmir. So in short terms, there is no such thing as Muslim Umma. Muslim Umma has died long long time ago and the Umma that you hear about is just a scheme used by GCC countries to use you as their mercenaries to fight their wars. Look at the Palestine Issue for example, there are 1.7 billion Muslims in the world and 6.1 million Jews in Israel, that makes 279 Muslim per Jew, and somehow these 1.7 billion Muslims can't get Palestine back from these Jews? Even though Al-Aqsa Mosque, the second holy place in Islam is located in there? So why do you think anybody in the Muslim Umma is going himself killed by fighting 1.3 billion people to get Kashmir back for you guys? Do you think it really matters to those GCC countries who gets the Kashmir? @KediKesenFare said India's policy won't work in the long term but he is wrong, India is clearly aimed to be a future super power, and when that happens do you really think these GCC counties that probably will have big trade relations with India at that time are going to get themselves in to trouble by backing you guys??? Being mercenary is all they want from you cause quite frankly, that's all you have to offer. Right now China, an infidel country, is more useful to you than all of the Muslim Umma and that's because they are the Indian's rivals, so they are backing you. The sooner you figure out about this Umma scheme and start rebuilding your economy and foreign relationships will be better for you.

A bitter pill to swallow, but the truth nonetheless.
 
1. When you say someone is taking the place which is "rightfully yours", you are just accepting your own epic fail. No one is going to sit around, waiting for you to somehow "miraculously" succeed when you yourself are doing everything to make sure you never would.

2. After a split, all history, political weight and international relations go to either the bigger part (USSR to Russia, not belarus), or the winner (ROC to PRC). If this is not the case, it is not sustainable (Bangladesh creation, for example).

3. Had religion be a credible binding force, we would not have had 2 world wars

4. International relations are based on "usefulness", not emotions. Make yourself useful to someone, good relations will follow.
 
Pakistan has vast differences with India on numerous grounds that separation would have been a necessity had partition not took place. Religion was not and never will be the stumbling block between the citizens of both countries. That's best left for another topic.



Only in your fictitious world is Pakistan synonymous with Islam. 'Muslims' like yourself do a splendid job everyday in trying to change that. Let's not try to distort facts, though.

Prior to partition, Jinnah, tried his utmost to separate religion from politics. Distancing himself from the Khalifat[Pan-Islamic] movement and other radical outfits while Gandhi[loved by Hindu India] was in full favour of the Khalifat movement. After the Lucknow Pact, prominent members belonging to the Hindu faith of IIM at the time and INC rightfully labelled him 'a champion of Hindu-Muslim unity'. Hardly someone who wants to play the religious card. All Jinnah wanted was to safeguard muslim interests within the country. The fanatical, Gandhi, didn't even want that.

Here's the words of your founding father:

"I cannot emphasize it too much. We should begin to work in that spirit and in course of time all these angularities of the majority and minority communities, the Hindu community and the Muslim community, because even as regards Muslims you have Pathans, Punjabis, Shias, Sunnis and so on, and among the Hindus you have Brahmins, Vashnavas, Khatris, also Bengalis, Madrasis and so on, will vanish. Indeed if you ask me, this has been the biggest hindrance in the way of India to attain the freedom and independence and but for this we would have been free people long long ago. No power can hold another nation, and specially a nation of 400 million souls in subjection; nobody could have conquered you, and even if it had happened, nobody could have continued its hold on you for any length of time, but for this. Therefore, we must learn a lesson from this. You are free; you are free to go to your temples, you are free to go to your mosques or to any other place or worship in this State of Pakistan. You may belong to any religion or caste or creed that has nothing to do with the business of the State. As you know, history shows that in England, conditions, some time ago, were much worse than those prevailing in India today. The Roman Catholics and the Protestants persecuted each other. Even now there are some States in existence where there are discriminations made and bars imposed against a particular class. Thank God, we are not starting in those days. We are starting in the days where there is no discrimination, no distinction between one community and another, no discrimination between one caste or creed and another. We are starting with this fundamental principle that we are all citizens and equal citizens of one State. The people of England in course of time had to face the realities of the situation... what exists now is that every man is a citizen, an equal citizen of Great Britain and they are all members of the Nation.

Now I think we should keep that in front of us as our ideal and you will find that in course of time Hindus would cease to be Hindus and Muslims would cease to be Muslims, not in the religious sense, because that is the personal faith of each individual, but in the political sense as citizens of the State."

It's pretty evident by his own words that Pakistan was never was supposed to be an Islamic State. It was eight years after Jinnah's death that Pakistan even was named one.

Right up until he drew his last breath, Jinnah, had nothing but love for India. After all he spent most of his life dreaming, plotting and fighting for a united India. While it was a bitter sweet pill for him, for the rest of the people it was an absolute blessing. Jinnah deserves to be remembered for what he was, an Indian patriot, the man deserves that after all he gave, Pakistan, not what the extremist elements on either side like to claim he was.

Pakistan was supposed to be a secular country inclusive to all, where muslims or anyone else regardless of their faith, caste or denomination wouldn't be marginalised. Blithering extremist like yourself will never change that, but people like yourself and the extremist elements present today go to prove that Pakistan has a long way to go in order to fulfil Jinnah's dream.
I reckon youre not Anglo saxon but an Indian. Shameful that your ashamed of showing your naionality. Well, I could care less.

As for your selective rantings:

I have one underlying principle in mind: the principle of Muslim democracy. It is my belief that our salvation lies in following the golden rules of conduct set for us by our great lawgiver, the Prophet of Islam.
  • In 1948, Address to Sibi Darbar
Pakistan not only means freedom and independence but Muslims ideology which has to be preserved which has come to us a precious gift and treasure and which we hope, others will share with us.
  • Address to Frontier Muslim Students Federation on 18th June 1945
  • have full faith in my people that they will rise to every occasion worthy of our past Islamic history, glory and traditions.

Islam lays great emphasis on the social side of things. Every day, the rich and the poor, the great and the small living in a locality are brought five times in a day in the mosque in the terms of perfect equality of mankind and thereby the foundation of a healthy social relationship is laid and established through prayer. At the end of Ramazan comes the new moon, the crescent as a signal for a mass gathering on the ‘Id day again in perfect equality of mankind which effects the entire Muslim world.
  • Message on the occasion of Eid-ul-Fitr in October 1941

The Quran is the general code for the Muslims, a religious, social, civil, commercial, military, judicial, criminal and penal code. It regulates every thing, from the ceremonies of religion to those of daily life, from the salvation of the soul to the health of the body, from the rights of all to those of each individual from morality to crime; from punishment here to that in the life to come, and our Holy Prophet Mohammad (Peace by upon Him) has enjoined on us that every Musalman should posses a copy of the Quran and be his own priest. Therefore, Islam is not merely confined to the spiritual tenets and doctrines or ritual and ceremonies. It is a complete code regulating the whole Muslim society, every department of life, collective and individual.

When we say 'This flag (Muslim League's flag) is the flag of Islam' they think we are introducing religion into politics - a fact of which we are proud. Islam gives us a complete code. It is not only religion but it contains laws, philosophy and politics. In fact, it contains everything that matters to a man from morning to night. When we talk of Islam we take it as all embracing word. We do not mean any ill. The foundation of our Islamic code is that we stand for liberty, equality and fraternity.


We should have a State in which we could live and breathe as free men and which we could develop according to our own lights and culture and where principles of Islamic social justice could find free play.
  • Address to Civil, Naval, Military and Air Force Officers of Pakistan Government, Karachi (11 October 1947)
Pakistan not only means freedom and independence but Muslims ideology which has to be preserved which has come to us a precious gift and treasure and which we hope, others will share with us.
  • Address to Frontier Muslim Students Federation on 18th June 1945[
Mr Jinnah was no doubt profound supporter of Union of India, until when owner of pigs let Pigs inisde mosuqes and what not when they won the election. Which gave him a stron reason to get off from Hindu rule. The moment British would leave, we we will be subjugated to Hindu rule. And as we can see it now, Gau rakshaks and wat not.

You see the history you have been taught In CBSE curruiculm is doctored my friend. As I Said before You dont have slightest idea of of the history of Pakistan. Secondly There was no such thing as Indian. It was British Indian raj.

India was more like What the name european is. A name given to subcontinents loose states. ( mostly which were under muslim control)

A brotherly word of advice to our Pakistani brothers, Your foreign policy is based on "Muslim Umma" concept, the idea that Muslim Umma is going to play the same role for you that NATO is playing for western society. But the thing you gotta know is that the Muslim Umma is much more fractured than western society in terms of linguistics, geographical, dispersion and tribalism. Muslims across the Muslims world don't speaks the same language, they don't have the same kind of Islam, some of them are very comfortable where they are they won't wanna wreck that for something like Kashmir. So in short terms, there is no such thing as Muslim Umma. Muslim Umma has died long long time ago and the Umma that you hear about is just a scheme used by GCC countries to use you as their mercenaries to fight their wars. Look at the Palestine Issue for example, there are 1.7 billion Muslims in the world and 6.1 million Jews in Israel, that makes 279 Muslim per Jew, and somehow these 1.7 billion Muslims can't get Palestine back from these Jews? Even though Al-Aqsa Mosque, the second holy place in Islam is located in there? So why do you think anybody in the Muslim Umma is going himself killed by fighting 1.3 billion people to get Kashmir back for you guys? Do you think it really matters to those GCC countries who gets the Kashmir? @KediKesenFare said India's policy won't work in the long term but he is wrong, India is clearly aimed to be a future super power, and when that happens do you really think these GCC counties that probably will have big trade relations with India at that time are going to get themselves in to trouble by backing you guys??? Being mercenary is all they want from you cause quite frankly, that's all you have to offer. Right now China, an infidel country, is more useful to you than all of the Muslim Umma and that's because they are the Indian's rivals, so they are backing you. The sooner you figure out about this Umma scheme and start rebuilding your economy and foreign relationships will be better for you.
Then the very existence of so called revolution sis fake in Iran. You must immediately get rid of it you know. It is only churning out ignorants like you or other Zombies who dwell in past Non islamic glory of fire worshipping Iran.

Damn the cheap propaganda is giving its results.
 
You may wonder about this terminology but I think it's really a matching concept here.

I already talked with some Pakistani users about India's new approach towards the Muslim nations in the Middle East. The Turkish-Indian relation is one good example to see what I was talking about.

Turkey - India

There are historical connections between India and Turkey. The first exchange of diplomatic missions between the Ottoman Sultans and the Muslim rulers of the subcontinent dates back to the years 1481-82. India and Turkey also have a cultural overlap. The Sufi philosophy of Mevlana Jelaluddin Rumi found resonance in the Indian sub-continent with its own traditions of Sufism and the Bhakti movement. There are also many words in common in Hindustani and Turkish languages.


More recent historical contacts between India and Turkey were reflected in the medical mission led by renowned Indian freedom fighter, Dr. M.A. Ansari, to Turkey in 1912 during the Balkan Wars and the Khilafat movement (1919-1924). India also extended support in the 1920s to Turkey’s War of Independence and the formation of the Turkish republic. Mahatma Gandhi himself took a stand against the injustices inflicted on Turkey at the end of World War-I
. (...)

Source: Indian Embassy in Turkey

After reading this short introduction, you'd almost think India is a Muslim country.

This text and the recent developments between India and the GCC states are just additional evidence that India is trying to construct a different narrative of its own history to change its perception in the Islamic world.

Modi's main goal is to occupy the rightful place of Pakistan among the Muslim world. It might sound strange at first but if you think about it you'll understand my arguments. New Delhi is trying to show India as Islamic as possible in the Muslim world in order to make Pakistan obsolete.

I know this won't work in the long term but one have to admit in some cases this strategy was successful.

Gentle reminder:
mpdi-uae-twitter-l.jpg


_______


Getting ostentatiously closer and closer to Sunni Arab Gulf countries, using Pakistan's Muslim legacy to build bridges to Turkey and in some cases even sending only Muslim Indian diplomats to Islamic countries are other examples of this new approach. I call this "Hindu Taqqiya".

Our bilateral relations with Islamic countries is pure commercial and transactional. If we both can benefit, why not? The Hindus and the rest of us openly state our intentions with Islamic countries: mutually beneficial.

We know that our Dharmic faiths are very distinct from the Middle Eastern-origin Abrahamic religions and we have no intention to mix the two concepts. We are proud of our identity and we'd like to keep it that way at any cost.

It is just that if a strategic or commercial deal benefits, say, Turkey and India, I don't see why we both shouldn't pursue it.

It is rather unfortunate that your friend Pakistan sees this as a challenge. We are using our resources to do business with you guys and they should do it as well. If they are finding us a challenge despite their massive advantage as an Islamic country, then it is the fault of their rulers who cannot understand the difference between relations between countries and relations between people.

What we are doing is less called Taqqiya and more called business management skills.


I don't see you guys wearing saffron robes and donning prayer beads.

Again, PM Modi is not a muslim. His personal choice to not wear a religious symbol which doesn't belong to his faith.
 
Then the very existence of so called revolution sis fake in Iran. You must immediately get rid of it you know. It is only churning out ignorants like you or other Zombies who dwell in past Non islamic glory of fire worshipping Iran.

Damn the cheap propaganda is giving its results.
Dude i'm suggesting the exact same thing for my own country.
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/iran...pporting-terrorism.485703/page-3#post-9329533
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/pale...countries-for-help.485596/page-5#post-9338353
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/iran...pporting-terrorism.485703/page-3#post-9332366
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/iran...pporting-terrorism.485703/page-5#post-9342028
What part of what I've said is wrong? I give you the numbers, the evidences and the reasons, what part of it is wrong? Glory of pre-Islamic Iran my a*s, what it has to do with that? This thread is created by a user from Turkey, are they have anything to do with past Non Islamic glory of fire worshiping Iran too? Even they are coming up with the same thing as I did. I think even our hardcore Ayatollahs know this too. If you open your eyes and start thinking you will come up with the exact same thing too.
 
Dude i'm suggesting the exact same thing for my own country.
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/iran...pporting-terrorism.485703/page-3#post-9329533
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/pale...countries-for-help.485596/page-5#post-9338353
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/iran...pporting-terrorism.485703/page-3#post-9332366
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/iran...pporting-terrorism.485703/page-5#post-9342028
What part of what I've said is wrong? I give you the numbers, the evidences and the reasons, what part of it is wrong? Glory of pre-Islamic Iran my a*s, what it has to do with that? This thread is created by a user from Turkey, are they have anything to do with past Non Islamic glory of fire worshiping Iran too? Even they are coming up with the same thing as I did. I think even our hardcore Ayatollahs know this too. If you open your eyes and start thinking you will come up with the exact same thing too.
I know the revolution was fake and all and it has made you peopele either zombies or Dead too ignorant of ISlam. As suggested to your other member too. Please refer to local CIA station in toppling the current fake regime and make your Iran non Islamic whatever you wish. Dont impose your shitty atitude on us
 
I know the revolution was fake and all and it has made you peopele either zombies or Dead too ignorant of ISlam. As suggested to your other member too. Please refer to local CIA station in toppling the current fake regime and make your Iran non Islamic whatever you wish. Dont impose your shitty atitude on us
What's wrong with you? I just had an argument and i gave you my reasons. I'm not imposing anything on you. I just ask you a simple question, what part of what I've wrote is wrong?
 
What's wrong with you? I just had an argument and i gave you my reasons. I'm not imposing anything on you. I just ask you a simple question, what part of what I've wrote is wrong?
You being bloody ignorant on history of Pakistan. If Any make your country civilized enough to deal with world before ''Suggesting'' and recommending as such
 
You being bloody ignorant on history of Pakistan. If Any make your country civilized enough to deal with world before ''Suggesting'' and recommending as such
OK, Next time that i wanted to write anything about your country in this forum, i'll ask for your permission first. Is that good enough for you? BTW you need to learn what a counter argument is before getting into a discussion.
 
OK, Next time that i wanted to write anything about your country in this forum, i'll ask for your permission first. Is that good enough for you? BTW you need to learn what a counter argument is before getting into a discussion.
Well, If it makes you feel any better. Then why not.

I stand corrected the most deluded people come from Iran.
 
Well, If it makes you feel any better. Then why not.

I stand corrected the most deluded people come from Iran.
It doesn't make a deference to my feelings, but apparently it hurts your feelings, So i guess next time that i want to write sth here, i'm gonna check it out with your feelings first.
Argument: Nobody is coming Pakistan, You're on your own.
Counter Argument: You are a Zombie who dwell in past non Islamic glory of fire worshiping Iran, The revolution was fake and it has made you people either zombies or dead too ignorant of Islam, Refer to local CIA station in toppling your current fake regime.
And i'm the most deluded person in the world.
VF0MjnG.jpg
 
It doesn't make a deference to my feelings, but apparently it hurts your feelings, So i guess next time that i want to write sth here, i'm gonna check it out with your feelings first.
Argument: Nobody is coming Pakistan, You're on your own.
Counter Argument: You are a Zombie who dwell in past non Islamic glory of fire worshiping Iran, The revolution was fake and it has made you people either zombies or dead too ignorant of Islam, Refer to local CIA station in toppling your current fake regime.
And i'm the most deluded person in the world.
VF0MjnG.jpg
Blimey, the exact situation of deluded itanis couldn't be described any better than above picture!
 
Back
Top Bottom