Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All irrelevant to the subject of the article ...
Don't worry thousands have.
Waste of time and bandwidth...so did you download his book and read it ?
...so did you download his book and read it ?
When you can generalize the words/actions of a few Hindus/Indians to represent the views of all the Indians why can't we assume the same for your words/actions ?Your questions assumes that I represent the whole Muslim community and that my answer will somehow provide a comprehensive solution to the communal question in India. On all points your assumption is wrong and answering your questions pointless.
There comes the difference between bestseller and free book.
While Mr. Ankit Panda recognizes that, “if Savarkar were alive today, he would see Pakistan and Bangladesh as belonging to the Hindu ‘nation.’” but does not take the implications or analysis of this any further and what this notion might mean for the South Asia region especially with the rise of Modi and the BJP. There is one element or concept that Nehru, Savarkar and Golwalkar all share and that is the idea of an Akhand Bharat or Greater India. This necessitates a hegemonic and expansionist foreign policy that could certainly invite conflict in the South Asia region. Indeed Nehru’s Forward Policy did lead to war with China in 1962 and newly revealed documents suggest that India was the aggressor in that particular conflict. There are indications that Modi will adopt a more muscular foreign policy if he were to become Prime Minister but it has not been clarified as to what this might mean in practice. I have argued in my book that whichever party comes to power in India they will continue the policy of hegemony and expansionism but only the methods and tactics will differ. While the Congress tends to be more subtle and coy about its foreign policy objectives the BJP may well be more overt but both strive to achieve an Akhand Bharat in South Asia –
What is Akhand Bharat? Are you trying to say a Bharat that includes Bangladesh & Pakistan? Then I can assure you that no sane person in India would want that, not even if these two countries beg to join India, the reasons are obvious.
Partition was the best thing to happen to contemporary India.
There comes the difference between bestseller and free book.
Well according to Ankit Panda the Hindu nationalists believe that Pakistan and Bangladesh belong to the Hindu nation.
Hearsay...Ankit Panda says Hindu nationalists say this and that....who is that Hindu nationalist? Give me a direct quote from someone credible looking forward to merge Pakistan & Bangladesh with India.
Then we have succeeded in one part. We already have a proxy govt in BangladeshI am not suggesting merging but annexation of parts of these countries is certainly on the cards and having proxy governments installed in either or both is certainly there.
Then we have succeeded in one part. We already have a proxy govt in Bangladesh
Why should it be difficult. We are proud of itAt least you admit it. That wasn't difficult was it?