rubyjackass
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2008
- Messages
- 3,610
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Man, Ambedkar was so against Hinduism, you won't call him a Hindu. If constituent assembly was illegitimate, then what is legitimate? RSS or VHP?1. Secularism was thrust upon the people of India by an illegitimate government. Even leaders like Ambedkar believed in "complete" partition.
It is not a foreign but a universal concept. Rejecting the concept is your freedom.2. Secularism is a foreign concept and rejecting it doesn't transform one into a militiaman.
This is not the age of revenge. Those days are over. If not, then we will start going backwards without any stop.3. Isn't it intriguing that all Hindu holy sites have mosques so closely built to the main temple structure or the mosques magically cropped up over the demolished structures? You call "it" a historical mistake, I call it "correcting the historical mistakes".
Ok. Pick your fight. Being hindu should not grant any special privilege for non-Indians.4. If we have to pick up a fight because some people do not want us to give refuge to destitute Hindus then we must pick this fight. This will be a legitimate fight.
You are assuming things. All liberals would ask is to have same asylum conditions for all refugees without regard for their religion, because Indian constitution requires it. You are making HINDU a word notorious for calling to revisionism and cultural cleansing by calling for unreasonable demands like "correcting historical mistakes".5. It is not understandable why to the "liberals" the word "HINDU" sounds like a curse word.
When did I say being Hindu is disqualification? I am just saying anyone should meet certain requirement to get asylum. And I don't care if you host a million refugees in your home. But watch out, they are not going to live identityless for a very long time. They will be burden on you and the state without access to many things like higher education.Not interested in testing Hinduness. That is a silly concept.
Plus I dont think being a Hindu disqualifies a non Indian person from just surviving in India as a refugee at least! This is especially ironical since pole vaulters get their citizenship cards so quickly.
If anyone feels threatened and feels safety in India because they follow a Dharmic faith, I will welcome them. We have worked to resettle Sikh Afghans and Hindu Pakistanis in the past and will continue to do so. Anyone can have issue with that. That is normal. They can take it up in court and get a 'cease and desist' order. And we will abide by the law of the land. Otherwise we shall continue. Don't take it personal bro. It is my duty as well.
Last edited: