Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
View attachment 339308
WASHINGTON: Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton has expressed concern over the
possibility of Pakistan's nuclear weapons falling into the hands of jihadists, which she said was
"a threatening scenario", according to a media report.
"Pakistan is running full speed to develop tactical nukes in their continuing hostility with India," the
former secretary of state told a close door fundraiser in Virginia in February, The New York Times
reported, citing 50minute audio audio being hacked from the Democratic Party's computers.
"But we live in fear that they're going to have a coup, that jihadists are going to take over the government, they're going to get access to nuclear weapons, and you'll have suicide nuclear bombers. So, this could not be a more threatening scenario," the daily quoted Clinton as saying in the audio that appeared on The Washington Free Beacon website.
During the fund raiser, responding to a question on modernisation of nuclear weapons, the daily said, Clinton went beyond the question towarn of an emerging nuclear arms race, naming Russia and China as well as Pakistan and India.
"This is one of the most dangerous developments imaginable," Clinton said. Such remarks from the former secretary of state gains significance in view of an interview of Pakistani
Defence Minister KhwajaMuhammad Asif to the local TV channel in which he threatened to
unleash nukes against India. "If our safety is threatened, we will annihilate them (India),"
Asif had said.
The United States appears to have taken a strong note of Asif's recent statements on use
of nuclear weapons. "Nuclear capable states have the responsibility to exercise restraint
regarding nuclear weapons and missile capabilities," a statedepartment official told PTI when
asked about the statements being made by the Pakistani leader.
Earlier, Defence Secretary Ashton Carter had said while India has generally shown responsible
behaviour with nuclear technology, Chinaconducts itself professionally, nuclear weapons in Pakistan
are entangled in history of tensions.
Meanwhile, in an opinion 'Consequences of Pakistani Terrorism: Raids signal that India won't tolerate more attacks in Kashmir', The Wall Street Journal warned that Pakistan increasingly risks
becoming a "pariah state" if it continues with policies. It said if Pakistan wants to prevent an
escalation of violence it needs to shut down the terror groups it continues to support. "That should start with JaisheMohammad and Lashkar e Taiba, two major jihadist groups that operate openly in Pakistan and are prime suspects in these attacks," it said.
"Both groups are supported by its military despite being on United Nations lists of terrorist
organizations," the daily said in the hard hitting opinion piece, a day after India carried out
surgical strikes in Pakistanoccupied Kashmir against terrorists planning to sneak into the country.
The Journal noted that the Prime Minister Narendra Modi has consistently offered closer economic
and diplomatic ties to Pakistan as long as it stops supporting terrorism.
Pakistan, it argued, needs a new vision centered on improving the lives of its people.
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com...m-pakistan/articleshow/54600823.cms?prtpage=1
" During the fund raiser, responding to a question on modernisation of nuclear weapons, the daily said, Clinton went beyond the question to warn of an emerging nuclear arms race, naming Russia and China as well as Pakistan and India" senseableGoogle and check the quoted sources before rejecting everything outright
The Washington Free Beacon website
The Wall Street Journal
Ha ha is she on marijuana? Ask your cia or think tank lol
She fear because they don't get control in 15 years what Pakistan got in 2 years
Now either rats in pak are killed and sent back to Afghanistan where they were belong
We have isi and Pakistan armed forces to defend our assets
USA already has full command over Pakistan nuke arsenal.
If Pakistan attacks India with nukes, its directed from them?
We should develop ICBMs though, to avoid a situation where a superpower feels free to threaten us to bomb us back into stone age, having an ICBM will assure that we can hit back too.
View attachment 339308
WASHINGTON: Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton has expressed concern over the
possibility of Pakistan's nuclear weapons falling into the hands of jihadists, which she said was
"a threatening scenario", according to a media report.
"Pakistan is running full speed to develop tactical nukes in their continuing hostility with India," the
former secretary of state told a close door fundraiser in Virginia in February, The New York Times
reported, citing 50minute audio audio being hacked from the Democratic Party's computers.
"But we live in fear that they're going to have a coup, that jihadists are going to take over the government, they're going to get access to nuclear weapons, and you'll have suicide nuclear bombers. So, this could not be a more threatening scenario," the daily quoted Clinton as saying in the audio that appeared on The Washington Free Beacon website.
During the fund raiser, responding to a question on modernisation of nuclear weapons, the daily said, Clinton went beyond the question towarn of an emerging nuclear arms race, naming Russia and China as well as Pakistan and India.
"This is one of the most dangerous developments imaginable," Clinton said. Such remarks from the former secretary of state gains significance in view of an interview of Pakistani
Defence Minister KhwajaMuhammad Asif to the local TV channel in which he threatened to
unleash nukes against India. "If our safety is threatened, we will annihilate them (India),"
Asif had said.
The United States appears to have taken a strong note of Asif's recent statements on use
of nuclear weapons. "Nuclear capable states have the responsibility to exercise restraint
regarding nuclear weapons and missile capabilities," a statedepartment official told PTI when
asked about the statements being made by the Pakistani leader.
Earlier, Defence Secretary Ashton Carter had said while India has generally shown responsible
behaviour with nuclear technology, Chinaconducts itself professionally, nuclear weapons in Pakistan
are entangled in history of tensions.
Meanwhile, in an opinion 'Consequences of Pakistani Terrorism: Raids signal that India won't tolerate more attacks in Kashmir', The Wall Street Journal warned that Pakistan increasingly risks
becoming a "pariah state" if it continues with policies. It said if Pakistan wants to prevent an
escalation of violence it needs to shut down the terror groups it continues to support. "That should start with JaisheMohammad and Lashkar e Taiba, two major jihadist groups that operate openly in Pakistan and are prime suspects in these attacks," it said.
"Both groups are supported by its military despite being on United Nations lists of terrorist
organizations," the daily said in the hard hitting opinion piece, a day after India carried out
surgical strikes in Pakistanoccupied Kashmir against terrorists planning to sneak into the country.
The Journal noted that the Prime Minister Narendra Modi has consistently offered closer economic
and diplomatic ties to Pakistan as long as it stops supporting terrorism.
Pakistan, it argued, needs a new vision centered on improving the lives of its people.
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com...m-pakistan/articleshow/54600823.cms?prtpage=1
This is called the preparation of the Ground to do one more Iraq.