What's new

Hijab is not Bangladeshi culture, its Saudi culture: Former minister Menon

Bangladeshi women would wear sleeveless tops and shorts instead. The hijab is just an archaic and misogynistic practice that has no place in modern society.
 
.
Where you got the theory that we are allowed to marry such child? Before puberty no Intercourse is allowed. Are you trying to say the marriage of Rasulullah (pbuh) with Hazrat Aisha? Their Intercourse happened after her puberty.

However that time marriage with 9 years old was not condamnable. Mother Mary was also a kid when she was married to her husband.

Recently when Rabindranath Tagore married, how old his wife was? Remember that?
In Jewish culture 13 years old boy and 12 years old girl is considered adult.

Yet you choose only one to single out. Because if you choose Judeo-Christian religion to single out every time, you would be in trouble. You are living in their country.


Who does not claim that? Christians do so too.

Tagore was an avowed enemy of Islam and Muslims, and he was a blasphemer against prophet Muhammad saws.

Yet still some take him as an idol.
 
. . . .
Tagore was an avowed enemy of Islam and Muslims, and he was a blasphemer against prophet Muhammad saws.

Yet still some take him as an idol.

Nobody takes Tagore as an idol. Everybody respects him and adores him for his literary genius. Your ancestors lied enough about Tagore to malign the Bengalis which contributed to their hatred of Bengalis and they did what they did in '71. Looks like they also taught your new generations the lies.
 
. .
Please provide some concrete evidences regarding your claims.

Here is a good start.

In a letter written to Sri Kalidas Nag, Tagore stated, “There are two religions on the Earth which have distinct enmity against all other religions. These two are Christianity and Islam. They are not satisfied with just observing their own religions but are determined to destroy all other religions. That’s why the only way to make peace with them is to embrace their religion.

Original works of Rabindranath Vol. 24 page 375, Vishwa Bharti; 1982

https://www.youthkiawaaz.com/2013/04/indias-islamophobic-icons/

Hindus and Muslims can make a fake friendship: Whenever a Muslim called upon the Muslim society, he never faced any resistance- he called in the name of one God `Allah-ho-Akbar'. On the other hand, when we (Hindus) call will call, `come on, Hindus', who will respond? We, the Hindus, are divided in numerous small communities, many barriers-provincialism - who will respond overcoming all these obstacles?
"We suffered from many dangers, but we could never be united. When Mohammed Ghouri brought the first blow from outside, the Hindus could not be united, even in the those days of imminent danger. When the Muslims started to demolish the temples one after another, and to break the idols of Gods and Goddesses, the Hindus fought and died in small units, but they could not be united. It has been provided that we were killed in different ages due to our discord.

The above is the part of the article "Swamy Shraddhananda', written by Rabindranath in Magh, 1333 Bangabda; compiled in the book 'Kalantar'

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/tagore-the-islamophobe.307449/

As long as you don’t purify the soil, which grows only thorny shrubs you can not expect any fruit.” [About Muslims and Islam]

Same source as above.

https://sabrangindia.in/article/what-did-rabindranath-tagore-think-about-islam

Your ancestors

They were fighting the Dogra occupation of Kashmir, while you were making puja to Saddhus.

There were also hindus. Raja Dahir was hindu and Bin Qasim took many hindu slaves. It doesn't make a difference, all of those were pagan religions.

Since when did you become a scholar on Pakistan, lol.

Dahir was a usurper and it was the local people who revolted against him which saw his fall.

Muhammad bin Qasim RA was a hero and rightfully regarded as such by the people of Sindh.

I don’t know why Bengalis try to Hinduism everything. Accept Islam fully or not at all.
 
.
They were fighting the Dogra occupation of Kashmir, while you were making puja to Saddhus.

They were betraying, backstabbing and killing Muslims like true munafiqeen. Inshallah, they will be resurrected as munafiqeen and given what they deserve.


Since when did you become a scholar on Pakistan, lol.

Dahir was a usurper and it was the local people who revolted against him which saw his fall.

Muhammad bin Qasim RA was a hero and rightfully regarded as such by the people of Sindh.

I don’t know why Bengalis try to Hinduism everything. Accept Islam fully or not at all.

Whether Raja Dahir was a usurper or not, whether people revolted against him or not, what has that got to do with this discussion.

I was responding to your sly and smartass remark in post 43, as if Bengali and Indian Muslims had hindu mushrik past but Pakistanis were muslims from day one.

Ancient Hindu culture is no longer suitable for a Muslim county and its social environment.
Alhamdulilah Indian and BD Muslims have moved on from that time

Even the Prophet (SAW) was born in a mushrik family, his parents were mushrikeen and many ulama hold that they are in the fire. Abu Bakr Siddique, Umar, Usman, Ali and all sahaba RA were mushrikeen before accepting Islam. All muslims of today including the Arabs had Mushrik ancestors.

Raja Dahir was a hindu, there were many hindu temples in Sindh, many hindus were captured as slaves indicate there were many hindus in Sindh. There were also buddhist, Zoroastrians and indo-aryan religions as you say, but that does not make any difference. As per Islam all of them were mushrikeen. So, your sly remark indicating Bengalis and Indians had hindu ancestors does not earn you any point, your ancestors and the ancestors of the Arabs were also mushrikeen. And for your information Bengalis were mostly buddhist, not that it makes any difference.
 
.
Here is a good start.

In a letter written to Sri Kalidas Nag, Tagore stated, “There are two religions on the Earth which have distinct enmity against all other religions. These two are Christianity and Islam. They are not satisfied with just observing their own religions but are determined to destroy all other religions. That’s why the only way to make peace with them is to embrace their religion.

Original works of Rabindranath Vol. 24 page 375, Vishwa Bharti; 1982

https://www.youthkiawaaz.com/2013/04/indias-islamophobic-icons/

Hindus and Muslims can make a fake friendship: Whenever a Muslim called upon the Muslim society, he never faced any resistance- he called in the name of one God `Allah-ho-Akbar'. On the other hand, when we (Hindus) call will call, `come on, Hindus', who will respond? We, the Hindus, are divided in numerous small communities, many barriers-provincialism - who will respond overcoming all these obstacles?
"We suffered from many dangers, but we could never be united. When Mohammed Ghouri brought the first blow from outside, the Hindus could not be united, even in the those days of imminent danger. When the Muslims started to demolish the temples one after another, and to break the idols of Gods and Goddesses, the Hindus fought and died in small units, but they could not be united. It has been provided that we were killed in different ages due to our discord.

The above is the part of the article "Swamy Shraddhananda', written by Rabindranath in Magh, 1333 Bangabda; compiled in the book 'Kalantar'

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/tagore-the-islamophobe.307449/

As long as you don’t purify the soil, which grows only thorny shrubs you can not expect any fruit.” [About Muslims and Islam]

Same source as above.

https://sabrangindia.in/article/what-did-rabindranath-tagore-think-about-islam
So you call those articles evidence? Because these were written by Hindus ? You also can search google by writing , rabindrantha the herald of religious unity " you will find many articles that refute such defaming articles .

However from your quote I find know blasphemy against Muhammad (pbuh) . And here his criticism was for christianity too . And it is actually related to Muslim rulers , not directly to islam or prophet (pbuh) , so it can not be called any type of blasphemy .

However start with this , and search more .you will find many refutation .

https://www.telegraphindia.com/opin...ming-tagore-for-communal-politics/cid/1691911
@Pan-Islamic-Pakistan
 
Last edited:
.
In a letter written to Sri Kalidas Nag, Tagore stated, “There are two religions on the Earth which have distinct enmity against all other religions. These two are Christianity and Islam. They are not satisfied with just observing their own religions but are determined to destroy all other religions. That’s why the only way to make peace with them is to embrace their religion.
So, may I ask was Tagore wrong in his assessment about these two (actually, one) religions bent on criticizing and destroying other religions? Other religions do not feel enmity towards these one/two religions but these one/two religions feel enmity towards all other religions that are still causing the destruction of monuments of other great civilizations time and again by their spiteful hands.

Any religion is just another faith. So, people should worship their God(s) they believe in. It is not anybody's business to poke in other religious activities. However, some people of one certain religion think it is a God-sanctioned mandate that they kill other religionists and bomb their civilization when they themselves are incapable of building any knowledge/technology-based modern civilization and are living on charity extended by others (Christian, Hindu, Buddhist, and Pagan) while pipe dreaming of entering Paradise.
 
Last edited:
.
Bangladeshi women would wear sleeveless tops and shorts instead. The hijab is just an archaic and misogynistic practice that has no place in modern society.
Who are you to decide what Bangladeshi women wear or not ? Being judgemental is not the way for an American man who claim themselves as representative of freedom of choice !
 
Last edited:
.
So you call those articles evidence? Because these were written by Hindus ? You also can search google by writing , rabindrantha the herald of religious unity " you will find many articles that refute such defaming articles .

However from your quote I find know blasphemy against Muhammad (pbuh) . And here his criticism was for christianity too . And it is actually related to Muslim rulers , not directly to islam or prophet (pbuh) , so it can not be called any type of blasphemy .

However star with this , and search more .you will find many refutation .

https://www.telegraphindia.com/opin...ming-tagore-for-communal-politics/cid/1691911
@Pan-Islamic-Pakistan

Speaking of Tagore....LOL:

https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/imr...-rabindranath-tagore-as-khalil-jibran-2056043
 
.
Here is a good start.

In a letter written to Sri Kalidas Nag, Tagore stated, “There are two religions on the Earth which have distinct enmity against all other religions. These two are Christianity and Islam. They are not satisfied with just observing their own religions but are determined to destroy all other religions. That’s why the only way to make peace with them is to embrace their religion.

Original works of Rabindranath Vol. 24 page 375, Vishwa Bharti; 1982

https://www.youthkiawaaz.com/2013/04/indias-islamophobic-icons/

Hindus and Muslims can make a fake friendship: Whenever a Muslim called upon the Muslim society, he never faced any resistance- he called in the name of one God `Allah-ho-Akbar'. On the other hand, when we (Hindus) call will call, `come on, Hindus', who will respond? We, the Hindus, are divided in numerous small communities, many barriers-provincialism - who will respond overcoming all these obstacles?
"We suffered from many dangers, but we could never be united. When Mohammed Ghouri brought the first blow from outside, the Hindus could not be united, even in the those days of imminent danger. When the Muslims started to demolish the temples one after another, and to break the idols of Gods and Goddesses, the Hindus fought and died in small units, but they could not be united. It has been provided that we were killed in different ages due to our discord.

The above is the part of the article "Swamy Shraddhananda', written by Rabindranath in Magh, 1333 Bangabda; compiled in the book 'Kalantar'

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/tagore-the-islamophobe.307449/

As long as you don’t purify the soil, which grows only thorny shrubs you can not expect any fruit.” [About Muslims and Islam]

Same source as above.

https://sabrangindia.in/article/what-did-rabindranath-tagore-think-about-islam



They were fighting the Dogra occupation of Kashmir, while you were making puja to Saddhus.



Since when did you become a scholar on Pakistan, lol.

Dahir was a usurper and it was the local people who revolted against him which saw his fall.

Muhammad bin Qasim RA was a hero and rightfully regarded as such by the people of Sindh.

I don’t know why Bengalis try to Hinduism everything. Accept Islam fully or not at all.

You lose me when you make posts regarding blanket statements on Bengalis.

The spectrum of thought amongst Bengalis is wide as I know is with Pakistanis.

Its not exactly fair to label Bengalis as one thing or another when there is such heterogeneity of thought amongst us.

The reality is Bengali society is more or less conservative and Islamic.

There are of course many outliers.

But to suggest anything else is incorrect.
 
Last edited:
. .
Back
Top Bottom