I match with what people say and then the actual outcome .. and that is how you establish credibility
So far he is on the money .. so till he starts making consistent errors I won’t stop listening
Take the credibility of the Indian army .. why is it zero ?
So Indians claim they took Kargil ? ..
ok .. so they were good at mountain combat ?
right ?
So how did this happen ?
Indians claim that IAF will beat the hell out of PAF ? Right .. so how does this keep happening?
Get my point ?
They are only ones making sense
Seriously you what is the alternative? Modi controlled media ?
lol
How is a thread on HezbAllah and the dubious assertions of Ritter and McGregor related in any way to India?
I cannot begin to tell you how much I don't give a shit about India. India, to me, is like a Dante's Inferno. One layer, people are swimming in boiling shit. The next layer, they are showering in piss. The next layer, they are caked in dirt and feasting on the meat of their dead guru. The layer after that, they are giving white people rim jobs. A layer after that, they are having sex in abnormal positions and calling it spirituality. The final layer, they are fuming and red about Pakistan.
I cannot tell you how uninterested I am in India's affairs. Indians are just the butt of a cosmic joke for me.
What I will tell you though is that both Ritter and McGregor are to military analysis what tabloids are to objective journalism. How can you even look at the YouTube thumbnails, with all the large letters, bright colors, and hyperbolic statements like "UKRAINE IS ONE DAY AWAY FROM ANNIHILATION, ZELENSKY ON KNEES READY TO SUCK DICK FOR MILITARY AID" and think any of this is reliable? These are YouTube celebrities paid by the MAGA movement to shape public perception in such a way as to benefit the re-election of Donald Trump. Ritter is a disgraced man who was outed for pedophilia, so he's liable to spit whatever bullshit his paymasters want him to. McGregor is widely known to be completely incompetent. These two are trying to undermine the Biden administration and capitalize on its mistakes by attempting a "told you so" that will swing people to vote for Republicans. It's elementary, a double-digit IQ can figure this out.
In other words, if you were in legal trouble, would you trust the desperate, slimy Saul Goodman, with his colorful, attention-seeking suits and his tacky office? And his clientele of thugs and druggies (people who follow McGregor and Ritter are akin to thugs and druggies as they are often uneducated stiffs that want a reason to be mad at their government)? Or would you go to a law firm that has a professional feel, with associates wearing crisp suits, and a consultation that gives you facts without hyperbole? Desperation is a sign you should not trust the person giving you information. Same applies to "analysts" like McGregor and Ritter.
A mind is a terrible thing to waste.
