JayAtl
BANNED
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2010
- Messages
- 8,812
- Reaction score
- -14
Once again, it's sad to continually expose your ignorance of facts. As I mentioned, you confuse dominance with absolute, unflinching control.
So, let's look at your examples:
Mubarak -- US paid $2 billion/year bounty to the thug to keep his people in check for decades. This despite the fact that 95% of Egyptians oppose Israel. Eventually, the people rebelled -- not about Israel but domestic issues -- and the thug had to go.
So the ZIONIST have left us now? because if they had a hold -we would have given Mubarak the green light he would have slaughtered his people and kept being in power. Some how we asked the military to not attack the people when they had just started to because Zionist fvaoured it You know slaughtering one's people a very common 'thang' among those countries. Some how Zionist love the Muslim brotherhood in your equation because everyone knew they were the biggest opposition party and were sure to take over
Gaddafi -- he outlived his usefulness and it was time to find new puppets.
A man who was working to get sanctions dropped, supply us with all the oil, had plenty of secrets to tell, who had only a few years into his " change of heart on america" out lived his american welcome? so by that logic- if no uprising- we would taken him out and put whom in there? an unknown over a known? is that what your study tells you? more absolute statements not founded in realities but your gut feeling... This is too funny. The man was not useful to us, he was responsible for Pan am and we never bothered taking him out. But moment he becomes pals we want to take him out!
Syria -- there are claims that the rebels are being supplied by foreign sponsors, so the conflict is very much in play.
What? if the Zionist had a hold on us we would not be sitting aside and watching it play, we would taken it out just like the neo cons in US having pushing for all year.
Iran -- the US is leading the way on the anti-Iran sanctions even though Iranian nukes are not a threat to the US.
This is hilarious ! so the Zionist who are obviously pro Israel want us go the sanctions route? I guess Israel's PM is not a Zionist since he's been asking now two US administrations to attack Iran and screw sanctions. Right here it tells me - you have no basis to ever speak on foreign policy topics.
Don't insult moderate Hindus and Jews. You represent neither.
Oh Okayyyy mr I see evil mongers against Muslims everywhere
Here is deal. none of you guys ever come out to help your brethren. only rely on Americans to save the slaughter of women and children but are great issuing paper edicts at the OIC.