Hasina’s another term can make a big difference for Bangladesh: Muhith

[bluesky]

যে রাজ্যে বেগম হাসিনা নাই সে রাজ্যও যদি চলে তাহলে বাংলাদেশও চলবে এবং খুব ভালোভাবেই চলবে, অরাজকতা কমে আসবে ছাত্রলীগের তাণ্ডবলীলাও থাকবেনা। প্রয়োজন হচ্ছে একটি সুষ্ঠ নির্বাচনের ব্যবস্থা করা।

 

[Anubis]

Indeed , so Muhit can be finance Minister again , and we need to learn that who have 10000 tk they are rich ( as we already know that who has 1 lakh taka he is rich ; according to this definition for the first time I felt that I am a rich man too , not poor.) , so put tax on them .
Make minimum call charge will increase again ( since Bangladeshi folks will be rich automatically with the blessing of AL ) , and many more ..... .
You do not believe this ? Rubbish rubbish rubbish .... Do you know better than the superman Mal Muhit ?

Muhith has been trying to retire for a long time. They won't let him because they can't confirm a replacement.

 

[bluesky]

One more term by the bank robbers and there will be an auction for Bangladesh Bank.

The Bangladesh Bank heist is certainly not related to BAL. But, BAL is looting the borrowed project money meant for infrastructures. The cost of many of these projects is highest in the world as if this BAL is coating them with gold, ruby, and jade.

Many unnecessary projects have been awarded to foreign companies for feasibility studies. Many of these companies may have been introduced by Rehana and her nephew Joy. BAL group is the biggest hypocrite and thief and should be ousted through a proper election under a neutral government.

 

[T-Rex]

The Bangladesh Bank heist is certainly not related to BAL.

Those people who were supposed to protect the funds did not do their job or failed to do it, whichever way you look at it and they were appointed by the BAL regime. This makes the regime responsible for this crime. If it was a democratic government it would have resigned immediately after such humongous failure or incompetence whatever you call it. But of course we are talking about a regime which elects itself through sham elections, so it is a normal course for such a regime.

 

[VikingRaider]

Muhith has been trying to retire for a long time. They won't let him because they can't confirm a replacement.

Yes and that is the real problem that they can not find an alternative .What a shame!

যে রাজ্যে বেগম হাসিনা নাই সে রাজ্যও যদি চলে তাহলে বাংলাদেশও চলবে এবং খুব ভালোভাবেই চলবে, অরাজকতা কমে আসবে ছাত্রলীগের তাণ্ডবলীলাও থাকবেনা। প্রয়োজন হচ্ছে একটি সুষ্ঠ নির্বাচনের ব্যবস্থা করা।

পুরা ফেয়ার ইলেকশন হইসে নাকি দেশে কোনদিন?

 

[bluesky]

Yes and that is the real problem that they can not find an alternative .What a shame!
পুরা ফেয়ার ইলেকশন হইসে নাকি দেশে কোনদিন?

No one claims a 100% fair election in the past. But, taking away 153 seats out of 300 also never happened. A caretaker govt is needed for the election time for a limited period. 2nd worst was perhaps in 1970 December election.

 

[TopCat]

যে রাজ্যে বেগম হাসিনা নাই সে রাজ্যও যদি চলে তাহলে বাংলাদেশও চলবে এবং খুব ভালোভাবেই চলবে, অরাজকতা কমে আসবে ছাত্রলীগের তাণ্ডবলীলাও থাকবেনা। প্রয়োজন হচ্ছে একটি সুষ্ঠ নির্বাচনের ব্যবস্থা করা।

Dont want see Chatra Dal tandob...
At least you can complain against Chatra League but for Chatra Dal you cant even do that.

 

[VikingRaider]

No one claims a 100% fair election in the past. But, taking away 153 seats out of 300 also never happened. A caretaker govt is needed for the election time for a limited period.

Lol yes, but previous election was actually not election , but mess . still AL is surviving . It's disaster no doubt.

2nd worst was perhaps in 1970 December election.

Was it 2nd worst ? I thought it was best as under Yahyiha regime Mujib own ! Could you please elaborate? I am confused !I do not know the history of it outside the history taught by our govt! @bluesky

Dont want see Chatra Dal tandob...
At least you can complain against Chatra League but for Chatra Dal you cant even do that.

Also do not forget Logi boitha tandab by AL in 2001, and current hammer treatment of BCL. No one is actually good. And complaining is possible against everyone , perhaps your condition was different .

 

[bluesky]

Dont want see Chatra Dal tandob...
At least you can complain against Chatra League but for Chatra Dal you cant even do that.

If you want to get rid of all these Chatro groups you need a fair election every time. If a certain group becomes arrogant the related party will lose the election. It happened about ten years ago when BNP lost. So, a similar situation must come back. In this way, the Chatro Tandob will at least go down.

 

[TopCat]

Also do not forget Logi boitha tandab by AL in 2001, and current hammer treatment of BCL. No one is actually good. And complaining is possible against everyone , perhaps your condition was different .

I believe my situation let me know people from both the party of my area in Dhaka. I know how they already distributed all the streets in my area among themselves for collecting toll before 2014 election. They were confident to come to power. So I dont care much about them. I need statbility for another 5/10 years. After that we will think about perfect democracy.

Besides, for what they did in 21st August/2004, they lost all the legitimacy to rule this country. The should not be trusted.

 

[bluesky]

Was it 2nd worst ? I thought it was best as under Yahyiha regime Mujib own ! Could you please elaborate? I am confused !I do not know the history of it outside the history taught by our govt! @bluesky

Yahya or his military was not at all in control of the election. I am not sure, but it was probably done intentionally to lure AL to raise its after-election stake so that the military could react. AL did it exactly what yahya wanted, but he did not forsee an intervention by India by giving training to the youths and finally involving itself directly.

By the way, are you aware that out of the total number of voters in the east 53% voted for AL, although it won in 167 seats.

 

[Al-zakir]

I believe my situation let me know people from both the party of my area in Dhaka. I know how they already distributed all the streets in my area among themselves for collecting toll before 2014 election. They were confident to come to power. So I dont care much about them. I need statbility for another 5/10 years. After that we will think about perfect democracy.

Besides, for what they did in 21st August/2004, they lost all the legitimacy to rule this country. The should not be trusted.

You can vote for BAL as much as you want but why do you want other to do the same?

Majority of the country will decide who is legitimate and who is not.

Let there be fair election and let people select their leaders.

 

[Mage]

No one claims a 100% fair election in the past. But, taking away 153 seats out of 300 also never happened. A caretaker govt is needed for the election time for a limited period. 2nd worst was perhaps in 1970 December election.

Democracy is useless in a country like ours. People ends up electing war criminals like Nizami, elects known goons like Joynal Hazari, Pintu.

 

[VikingRaider]

By the way, are you aware that out of the total number of voters in the east 53% voted for AL, although it won in 167 seats.

No did not research before ! Just knew the common popular figure of AL won 74% vote from East Pakistan . So if the total vote casting was 53% from East pakistan , then I am surprised , because after 1969 uprising , voter turn out should have been much larger in number.

Besides, for what they did in 21st August/2004, they lost all the legitimacy to rule this country. The should not be trusted.

Indeed they did very bad , no doubt .
As AL actually did the worst thing from 1972 to 1975 , there was famine in Bangladesh and peoples died starving , and the rokkhi bahini even prevented peoples begging in airport area , so that relief giver do not know that their reliefs is actually devoured by criminals and a fair shared went to india by crossing border?
In this world actually AL is the only party who robbed foods of starving peoples , perhaps even Nazis did not do this heinous work , but still AL is is ruling the country , aren't they?
At least this history of that regime is well known to almost every one in BD , although I have no solid proof of it's authenticity as I was born almost after a decade of this era. (But it's a popular story at least and no one strongly refused it , so i assume this history to be true )

peoples can make mistake , but they should be given a fare chance . And also let peoples decide who will be their ruler . This is called democracy .

Democracy is useless in a country like ours. People ends up electing war criminals like Nizami, elects known goons like Joynal Hazari, Pintu.

Well if we need autocracy then why AL led autocracy only ? Why BNP can't led a autocratic Govt?
or if we need autocracy , we need fakhruddin type (not awami again) backed by military , at least in such regime no will give peoples hammer therapy .
And besides if peoples choose war criminals , who are you to stop them? In democracy anyone can vote freely , otherwise there is no point of democracy !

 

[Mage]

No did not research before ! Just knew the common popular figure of AL won 74% vote from East Pakistan . So if the total vote casting was 53% from East pakistan , then I am surprised , because after 1969 uprising , voter turn out should have been much larger in number.


Indeed they did very bad , no doubt .
As AL actually did the worst thing from 1972 to 1975 , there was famine in Bangladesh and peoples died starving , and the rokkhi bahini even prevented peoples begging in airport area , so that relief giver do not know that their reliefs is actually devoured by criminals and a fair shared went to india by crossing border?
In this world actually AL is the only party who robbed foods of starving peoples , perhaps even Nazis did not do this heinous work , but still AL is is ruling the country , aren't they?
At least this history of that regime is well known to almost every one in BD , although I have no solid proof of it's authenticity as I was born almost after a decade of this era. (But it's a popular story at least and no one strongly refused it , so i assume this history to be true )

peoples can make mistake , but they should be given a fare chance . And also let peoples decide who will be their ruler . This is called democracy .


Well if we need autocracy then why AL led autocracy only ? Why BNP can't led a autocratic Govt?
or if we need autocracy , we need fakhruddin type (not awami again) backed by military , at least in such regime no will give peoples hammer therapy .

Fakhruddin's govt is the beet govt I've seen in BD. I have said it several times here. But people wanted Hasina/Khaleda back.