Hasina wants Islam as Bangladesh state religion

[kobiraaz]

and once this lady not in office , BD will became Taliban country , coz few people always going to shout 'Islam Khatre me hain' for one reason or another..

JAR BIE TAR HUSH NAI PARA PORSHIR GHUM NAI

 

[BanglaBhoot]

When the PM says she wants the country to be Islamic that means she is going to do something un-Islamic or is already doing it.

 

[Tiki Tam Tam]

I think, the decision by your Aunti has tremedously made you guys unhappy. But, she has saved the country from radicalization. A srcularism would have a very negative reaction among the population. it would have created more storms and the radicals would have recruited their kind more in number.

So, you should congratulate your pretty Aunti for taking a Statewoman-like decision. We will remain an Islamic country, but not a Taliban country, where people would always say, 'Islam Khatre me hain,' whereby they themselves are the cause of this danger. Pakistan's Zia like people will not be born in Bangladesh. We will remain a moderate Muslim country.

Who are you alluding to as my Aunt? And anyway the spelling is ‘Aunty’ and not ‘Aunti’. We are aware where you come from, but I shall not stoop to your level of bringing in personal, malicious, contemptible slurs. Unfortunately, if you notice that it indicates that filial equations is not something that you are aware of, and I daresay experienced and hence you make the error of calling all and sundry as my Aunt.

As I had said earlier, who cares if BD is a Islamic country or claims equation with Martians? From the geopolitical and geostrategic standpoint, Bangladesh is a mere speck on the horizon and inconsequential; at best, to be humoured so that they have a ‘feel good’ feeling that they too exist. Not too long ago, if your memory does not fail you, you will recall that Bangladesh was an international breadbasket case. Don’t take my word for it, check what DAWN has to say:
Success and failure | | DAWN.COM

You maybe rest assured that the raving and ranting that India is doing A or B to Bangaldesh is merely a desperation to seek a place in the sun’ and a crying wail to indicate that you exist and yet none is taking cognisance.

Read my post. Where did I equate Islam as our state religion with Islamic Republic of Bangladesh. BD will remain as it is now, a moderate Muslim country. Try to impose a Hindu brand of secularism, it will bring about more radicalism than now. The country will fall prey to the fanatics who will love to see AL takes a wrong decision.

By the way, why do you think AL has got the mandate to proclaim a SECULARISM in Bangladesh? It will have to seek authorization from the voters. Can you guys expect to get a majority on this point?

Why do you guys want a secular Bangladesh? Would you mind telling us the name of a country which is secular, except in proclamation? And if the population are not secular minded why it is necessary to incorporate such a meaningless word in the Constitution? We do not have to follow the bad Indian example where the people do not touch others of lower rung, yet their Constitution says they are secular. It is a hypocrisy.

Now, you can eat your lichis, mangoes and jackfruits to your heart's content if you come to Bangladesh.

Sadly, there is nothing called Hindu secularism. It is the same secularism practised elsewhere.

In countries where there are sizeable populations of mixed religiosity, there will be strife. However, if it is secular, then there can be redresses. How? Through the Courts and which have Judges of various denominations of religions.

In a theocratic country, such redress is not feasible.

Just look around, the writing is on the wall, which only the blind and mentally challenged or a fundamentalist cannot see!!

Actually, his point is that the AL pretty much gets a lot of Indian support. Dipu Moni was basically placed there by India. Probably the worst foreign minister in the history of Bangladesh.

I know because she was my family's neighbor and vehemently opposes everything Pakistani. She even cursed at my dad for buying a Pakistani product.

Gotta love the crazy fantasy world of the AL, jeez...they are such a classic.

The AL are mindless egotistical freaks themselves. They really do not stand for any ideology. Not even Socialism.

AL == 'chor'

It is amusing to know that Ministers of a foreign country can be put into the Cabinet! It does speak volumes of the character of such a country and its populace.

It is good to know that the person was the neighbour and good of you to drop names so that we are in the know that you are ‘well connected’.

Jeez, by the way, means Jesus, and that is how it is said since you cannot take the Lord’s name in vain in Christianity.

Nice to know that you are a Christian too!

 

[Zabaniyah]

When the PM says she wants the country to be Islamic that means she is going to do something un-Islamic or is already doing it.

She did talk about the new property reform laws in which women get equal share of the property, thereby eliminating Sharia law. They were never truly implemented, and I don't think they'll ever be.

Dipu Moni is not even Muslim. Actually I don't know what her and her family's religion is, lol. But definitely, she is not Muslim!

Bangladesh's mainstream imams have tremendous support among Bangladeshis. And yes, she is frightened of them. Some radicals even tried to kill her.

I think that the Muhammad Yunus drama is sure taking up a lot of her and her party's time. My guess is that Hasina could not yet comprehend the future ramifications of her reckless actions against Yunus and Grameen Bank.

---------- Post added at 02:09 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:08 PM ----------

Jeez, by the way, means Jesus, and that is how it is said since you cannot take the Lord’s name in vain in Christianity.

Nice to know that you are a Christian too!

Us Muslim love Jesus! Jesus for king!!!

 

[Tiki Tam Tam]

Not necessarily. You can not prove that if we want to see Moderate Muslim Bangladesh then we have feeble mind and less faith on our religious faith. We will want to see (simply as a Muslim) a Moderate Muslim Bangladesh is one thing, and we have our individual faith (more/less) on ourselves about religion is another thing.


7. Now Indian media is spreading that extremisms are growing in BD
8. Today BD is a threat for India in future (spread by Indian media)

My contention is Identity.

If one is confident of one’s identity then one does not require flaunting one’s religion as a shield. For instance, do I have to prove that I am an Indian? If I am good enough and confident, those who require knowing who am I will find out on their own. I don’t have to flaunt it as my visiting card. However, if I am not up to the mark, I will have to continuously have to make it known so that I am heard. What is important? Recognition by the stint of your work or by wearing religion on your sleeve?

Take China. It was an international pariah. But they have, with their galloping economy and hard work, has made it certain that they cannot be ignored anymore.

So, the actual bottomline is what you achieve which leads to respect and recognition and not by being related to high ups or what one’s religion is!!

As I have said earlier in the last post neither India, nor the Indian media is unduly perturbed about BD.

Bangladesh is no economic powerhouse and it is no geoplotical or geostrategic gamechanger.

So, who cares about Bangladesh being a threat?

Don’t assume things just to surface from the feeling that Bangladesh is being ignored, just because it is merely another speck in the horizon and nothing serious to be troubled about!

Yes religion is a very powerful emotion, and it has given Bangladeshi Muslims a reason to be united more strongly somehow, where the common thing is we all are Bangladeshis and have respect to each other. And about troubles caused by religions: what troubles BD has faced in its life? We known about the incidences of religious riot in India. Has BD ever seen any such thing?





-Well, if India is not Hindu state then why there is sill religious turmoil in some places, also has history of several big turmoils like Gujrat riot? And being Moderate Muslim Country we have no such records.
- WHy are you implying that we are remained in stone age. We know where cow pee is drunk! And where the record of marry between ............................and record of many more things.



I did not say anything on favor of Hujis. I just said the common people opposing AL's secularism are not fundamentalist.



You need to retake a course on India steadies, especially the Indian/"orange media propaganda chapter". Not written by Indians, lol.



You are definitely paranoid from India perspective.


Now stop laughing.

If religion has to be a binder of any country, then it indicates that it is intrinsically hollow from the temporal standpoint.

Let me give you an example.

While I am no fanboy of China, yet I will appreciate issues that require appreciation. Religion is an anathema to China and yet there is immense nationalism, more than any other country of the world, in China. Why so? Because they are recognised by the world through their own effort towards progress wherein they have landmarks to show to feel justifiably proud. It maybe noted that China is no longer a pushover, even for the mightiest nation of the world, the US!!

Likewise the US. They are secular. And yet they just cannot be ignored!

The Arabs chug along even though they flaunt their religion on their sleeve. Why so? Because they control Oil = the product that engines industry and wars!!

So, wearing religion on the sleeve is not material. What is material is what you achieve that cannot be ignored by the world!!

To the next point. Indeed there have been religious riots in India. It is a multireligious country and with a secular constitution and with no Laws that puts one religion over the other and where the majority religion is applicable to minorities too! Further the so called minorities in India are not miniscule in percentages as in Bangladesh, where the minorities can be silenced at the village level itself!!

I hope that also clarifies the point you raised that if India is not a Hindu country, where is there riots.

One the issue of drinking urine, it does show you are not only unaware of your religious scriptures, but also unaware of the various recognised medical practices.

Do educate yourself first, before punching thoughts on the computer.

Google and check Uropathy as to what it is and where all it is practised.

And it is not that in India it is universal or sanctified by religion. Ayurveda is not a religious scripture.

In Sanskrit, the word ayurveda consists of the words āyus, meaning "longevity", and veda, meaning "related to knowledge" or "science".

You claim to be a pious Muslim. It is obvious that when you wrote of urine drinking in India you proved that you are not aware of your own scriptures.

Do peruse Sahih Bukhari, Ablutions (Wudu'), Volume 1, Book 4, Number 234.

May I also help you along for a quick dekko since you obviously are a busy man as it appears that you had no time to read the scriptures. Here, it is from an Islamic site:
Islam Question and Answer - The benefits of drinking camel urine

Hope, I have been of some use to you to update you in the Islamic instructions.

I am not too sure what you meant by ‘You need to retake a course on India steadies’.

Whatever makes you feel that India is not steady or that I am not steady?

Let me answer some of the points that you have raised in yoour post.

1) You are right about BD being a moderate Muslim country. It should stay that way.

2) Bangladesh's 1st Constitution was made secular. You have to understand which foreign country influenced this newly born and very weak country to incorporate this Clause. Certainly it was not China, Russia or USA. Your then Ambassador to BD may know why and how it happened.

This secularism was not acceptable to the population. It backfired on the face of Sk. Mujib and his mentor across the border. Unpopular Mujib was killed. But, even today many people do not try to really understand why there was such a violent reaction. Population and military establishment both saw him enemy of Islam and BD.

3) In case of BD, it was just opposite. Refer to 3) above.

4) Law enforcers cannot just enter the houses of Hujis and kill all of them. This could have been done during the secular time of Mujib. He formed a Rakkhi Bahini that killed anyone who was perceived as against the ruling party and its secularism.

No wonder, Mujib became so unpopular that very few Bangladeshis uttered at hearing his death, 'inna lillahe wa inna alihe rajeun.'

5) I have read many newspaper articles that want to keep the relationship between BD and Pakistan. They do not want an improved relationship by crying 1971. BD people do not have to hate Pakistan to love India. India must show a positive attitude instead of bullying and imposing an unbearable trade imbalance with BD. 6) People in BD are not paranoid, but they are disturbed by the attitude of India who tries to control Bd affairs through their paid proxies.

7) No, Bangladesh is not a major player in the international politics. But, if you consider our country's total area, you will see we are playing a much robust role in that field. An economically strong BD can certainly play a stronger role in the future.

8) BD people do not pretend to be super rich. This is how Indians project themselves. However, the entire world knows about the reality of the countries that exist in the entire south asia.

I must say, Indians should get rid of their false grandoise as if their life style is at par with the Bombay films.

I daresay Bangladesh was weak when it was formed. That is a figment of imagination if one takes it that they could shrug off the yoke of a well established and military powerful country to which they belonged. Another weak and pitiable thought to forcibly manoeuvre out of a trick knot.

Mujib was not killed because he was secular. He was killed because he attempted to make Bangladesh as an Awami League fiefdom. So, please do not ride the gossamer wings of fantasy. You can befool the babes born well after, but not those who have seen the events unfold.

I have not understood your ‘ 3) In case of BD, it was just opposite. Refer to 3) above.. The ‘3’ is not above but in the same line. So what is to be referred?

It is true that law enforcers cannot barge into the house of Hujis. But surely, the law can ensure their arrest in a legal manner.

Bangladesh does not have to hate Pakistan to love India. And if the newspapers want a union with Pakistan and you all feel so, then go ahead? Who can stop you? Just do it. Nike it fast. Why whine and want your cake and eat it too?!

Look India does not require Bangladesh to survive. If you feel that Indian trade and agreements is bullying or whatever, please don’t trade with India and don’t sign agreements. QED!

If Bangladesh is doing well, then good for it. Hurrah is what I say. But what concern it is of India except that it has a viable country as its neighbour and sooner it becomes economically strong, lesser will be the ingress of the illegals? It is a win win for India if Bangladesh becomes economically viable.

I know Bangladesh is not super rich. The world knows it too. As far as India is concerned your claim that India is not way ahead of many, I think you are living in a Fool’s Paradise. Check the world estimates and you will realise where India is and where are the others.

What is the grandiose lifestyle that Mumbai films show? In India, today every household has a Colour TV, cooking gas, some sort of transportation, mobiles, so on and so forth. They all wear natty clothes and have fancy gizmos too. For the fancy clothes, I will confess that the cheap Bangaldeshi clothes sold on the footpath and the cheap Chinese gizmos have indeed played a yeoman’s role!

 

[Tiki Tam Tam]

---------- Post added at 02:09 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:08 PM ----------

Us Muslim love Jesus! Jesus for king!!!

Of course!

The whole world knows that!

Even the Grimms Brothers and Hans Christian Andersen too!

Jesus Saves!

Enjoy!!

 

[Tiki Tam Tam]

Dipu Moni is not even Muslim. Actually I don't know what her and her family's religion is, lol. But definitely, she is not Muslim!

I find it amusing that while you all so vociferously enunciate issues of your country and all that, yet you do not know some basic facts.


Moni is the daughter of the late M.A. Wadud.

Moni is married to Tawfique Nawaz, who is an advocate.

Didn't you say you were neighbours?

 

[Zabaniyah]

Mujib was not killed because he was secular. He was killed because he attempted to make Bangladesh as an Awami League fiefdom. So, please do not ride the gossamer wings of fantasy. You can befool the babes born well after, but not those who have seen the events unfold.

I have not understood your ‘ 3) In case of BD, it was just opposite. Refer to 3) above.. The ‘3’ is not above but in the same line. So what is to be referred?

It is true that law enforcers cannot barge into the house of Hujis. But surely, the law can ensure their arrest in a legal manner.

Bangladesh does not have to hate Pakistan to love India. And if the newspapers want a union with Pakistan and you all feel so, then go ahead? Who can stop you? Just do it. Nike it fast. Why whine and want your cake and eat it too?!

Look India does not require Bangladesh to survive. If you feel that Indian trade and agreements is bullying or whatever, please don’t trade with India and don’t sign agreements. QED!

If Bangladesh is doing well, then good for it. Hurrah is what I say. But what concern it is of India except that it has a viable country as its neighbour and sooner it becomes economically strong, lesser will be the ingress of the illegals? It is a win win for India if Bangladesh becomes economically viable.

I know Bangladesh is not super rich. The world knows it too. As far as India is concerned your claim that India is not way ahead of many, I think you are living in a Fool’s Paradise. Check the world estimates and you will realise where India is and where are the others.

What is the grandiose lifestyle that Mumbai films show? In India, today every household has a Colour TV, cooking gas, some sort of transportation, mobiles, so on and so forth. They all wear natty clothes and have fancy gizmos too. For the fancy clothes, I will confess that the cheap Bangaldeshi clothes sold on the footpath and the cheap Chinese gizmos have indeed played a yeoman’s role!

You are partly correct about Mujib. Mujib was killed because the concerned army officers were frustrated with his leadership. He was not a very bright administrator. His sons were very evil. They used to go to people's houses and kidnap their wives and daughters to forcefully marry them. One of them was the wife of one Major Dalim.

His sons used to take much of the aid money and whatever was left in the bank for themselves, I mean, Bangladesh after the war received a LOT of aid. And not just that, there were many factors behind his assassination, much of it due to disgruntled army officers. Zia was reluctant to protect him for that very reason. No such thing as law & order back then.

Some people go as far as saying that if Mujib wasn't assassinated, then Bangladesh would have already fallen into India's hands. And the people that were saying this did live through the horrors of the Liberation War and its aftermath.

Skies is right if you take it into the context of Bangladeshi opinion. Many Bangladeshis have come to believe that India does not want Bangladesh to do well in all areas. Maybe you would want to see Bangladesh do well, but does India's politicians? That is the question.

Bangladesh's political and business LEADERSHIP is the one thing that is hindering its progress, but that is a another matter in your argument.

 

[Tiki Tam Tam]

You are partly correct about Mujib. Mujib was killed because the concerned army officers were frustrated with his leadership. He was not a very bright administrator. His sons were very evil. They used to go to people's houses and kidnap their wives and daughters to forcefully marry them. One of them was the wife of one Major Dalim.

His sons used to take much of the aid money and whatever was left in the bank for themselves, I mean, Bangladesh after the war received a LOT of aid. And not just that, there were many factors behind his assassination, much of it due to disgruntled army officers. Zia was reluctant to protect him for that very reason. No such thing as law & order back then.

Some people go as far as saying that if Mujib wasn't assassinated, then Bangladesh would have already fallen into India's hands. And the people that were saying this did live through the horrors of the Liberation War and its aftermath.

Skies is right if you take it into the context of Bangladeshi opinion. Many Bangladeshis have come to believe that India does not want Bangladesh to do well in all areas. Maybe you would want to see Bangladesh do well, but does India's politicians? That is the question.

Bangladesh's political and business LEADERSHIP is the one thing that is hindering its progress, but that is a another matter in your argument.

While one has to admire the manner Mujib mobilised Bangladesh, yet we are well aware of what he was doing.

In India, one was not enamoured by his activities.

In fact, his activities were dangerous for the neighbourhood.

I am also intrigued to learn how easy it is to rape (the news report stating that one coot had the audacity to give a Cocktail party for his 100th rape) or take away someone else's wife.

Honestly, if these are true, then it is a dangerous country. 100 rapes and there is no uprising, at least within the neighbourhood? Crazy.

I, of course, want Bangladesh to be up and going. If Bangladesh, on its own, can become economically vibrant, much of this paranoia and schizophrenia will cease and the illegal immigrants will not longer come into India. It is a win win for India.

As far as Indian politicians are concerned, they are myopic.

Unless there is a crisis, they will not bother about anything.

For them all is well with Bangladesh India relationship. Yet, I believe some movement towards solving the enclaves is in hand.

Bangladesh has huge potential, if not in industrial output for the moment, it has immense potential for international tourism.

The Hill Tracts for trekking, Chittagong's coastline for water adventure and just lolling around, Syhlet for cuisine, steamer rides from Goalando to the Bay of Bengal along the majestic Padma, devouring freshly caught Hilsa, the Sunderbans for Wild Life and so on and so forth. Just see how Thailand and Malaysia are going gung ho over their tourism to earn foreign exchange. Having seen Malaysia, I have seen how tourism if well advertised and 'jazzed up' can make the mundane into something exciting.

The sky is the limit for Bangladesh!

Let me also assure you that it is in the interest of vested interest to project that India is doing nothing for Bangladesh or when India does anything, it is doing it so to project 'Akhand Bharat' and chomp away everyone.

Actually, I did not know that there is something called Akhand Bharat till I saw it on the forums and then why I checked I found it was a theory of some ridiculous Hindu elements. But then I was never a religion watcher!

I know quite a few Bangladeshis, but I have never experienced the hostility that I see here. Of course, I am aware that they have issues but they do not exhibit with such rabid venom as here!

That Akhand Bharat is bogus is so evident is the fact when the BJP was in power, it was never spoken about, let alone being implemented.

 

[eastwatch]

Not too long ago, if your memory does not fail you, you will recall that Bangladesh was an international breadbasket case. Don’t take my word for it, check what DAWN has to say:
Success and failure | | DAWN.COM

In case of India, it is not long ago that it was a dirt poor country. It still is, it still lives in poverty. India came to the front suddenly only because some of the IT engineers built small firms in Bangalore and some companies in the USA started to outsource them. Now, a suddenly little rich Indian like you come up with some back dated news reports to abuse Bangladesh. It is ok that you have abused my poor upbringing and all those, but, do not abuse my country, BD.

It seems Indians are becoming jealous of the total achievements of Bangladesh. This may be the reason why they were favouring secularism here so that the fanatics come out from hiding and destabilize the country. Your Aunty already knows about this and has avoided falling in your trap. By the way, many Indians call her aunty all the time, but suddenly why you are allergic to it? Why are you against her?

See another thread that repots a 6.'% GDP growth this fiscal, and projects a 8% growth in 2014. Do not you think it is a big progress? You see, we have challenged the basket case attribution through hard work. But, Indians are not here to see these positive aspects of BD. Read below to see where your country's real position is. It is below sub-Saharan Africa. India is a shame to Asia and our region.

Poverty: India worse than Africa: News24: World: News

Poverty: India worse than Africa
2010-07-13 21:31

Related LinksUN chief sends SOS on poverty
'Human rights can end poverty'
Extreme poverty is dropping

London - More people are mired in poverty in eight Indian states than in the 26 poorest African countries, according to a new UN-backed measure of poverty out on Tuesday.

The Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) looks beyond income at a wider range of household-level deprivation, including services, which could then be used to help target development resources.

Its findings throw up stark statistics compared to regular poverty measures.

The study found that half of the world's MPI poor people live in South Asia, and just over a quarter in Africa.

There are 421 million MPI poor people in eight Indian states alone - Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal - and 410 million in the 26 poorest African countries combined.

The researchers said that the extent of poverty in India had often been overlooked, by figures comparing percentages of poor people in countries as a whole rather than sheer numbers.

According to the index, 64.5% of people in sub-Saharan Africa are MPI poor. In South Asia, 55% of people are MPI poor.


Both figures are higher than the number considered extreme income poor - living on less than $1.25 per day.

"Multi-dimensional poverty"

The new index was created by the Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI) at Oxford University in southern England, and the Human Development Report Office of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).

"Our measure identifies the most vulnerable households and groups and enables us to understand exactly which deprivations afflict their lives," said OPHI director Sabina Alkire.

"The new measure can help governments and development agencies wishing to target aid more effectively to those specific communities."

The MPI will be used in the forthcoming 20th anniversary edition of the UNDP Human Development Report. It supplants the Human Poverty Index, which has been used since 1997.

The index takes into account that people living in MPI poverty may not necessarily be income poor: only two-thirds of Niger's people are income poor, whereas 93% are poor by the MPI, it found.

It also showed that "multi-dimensional poverty" varies a lot within countries. In Delhi, 15% of people are MPI poor, compared to 81% in the northeastern Indian state of Bihar.

 

[Tiki Tam Tam]

In case of India, it is not long ago that it was a dirt poor country. It still is, it still lives in poverty. India came to the front suddenly only because some of the IT engineers built small firms in Bangalore and some companies in the USA started to outsource them. Now, a little rich Indian like you come up with some back dated news reports to abuse Bangladesh.

It seems Indians are becoming jealous of the total achievements of Bangladesh. This may be the reason why they were favouring secularism here so that the fanatics come out from hiding and destabilize the country. Your Aunty already knows about this and has avoided falling in your trap. By the way, many Indians call her aunty all the time, but suddenly why you are allergic to it? Why are you against her?

If India was dirt poor, you would have been grovelling under the West Pakistani boot.

India has not come into the forefront suddenly. It always had the potential, but it was hamstrung with the socialistic pattern of life, where the womb to the tomb philosophy prevailed.

Liberalisation came into being and Indians found their place.

If the US is outsourcing to India, it is not because they love us, it is because we have the knowledge and expertise and they have no option!

Let us take a neutral place with equal opportunities for comparison i.e. the UK.

Here it proves that in every aspect Indians lead.

We ask for no favours. Let facts speak

Home | Mail Online

"Pakistani and Bangladeshi households are the most likely to be workless at 22.3 per cent, while Indian households are the least likely, at 6.8 per cent."

So, there you are!

No more whines please!

You should be in Jay Leno's show. You would bring the house down.

Jealous of Bangladesh?

A speck on the horizon of inconsequential effect on the world map.

What a circus!!

Tell me your achievement and give a comparative study with India and Pakistan.

Let it then be known who is Jealous!!

By the way, many Indians call her aunty all the time, but suddenly why you are allergic to it?

really?

have you been working in Indian household to know tht many Indian call her Aunty? Good to see you have read my post elsewhere and corrected your spelling.

Be gracious enough to thank me.


Do cease your whine. Show some pedigree and debate on facts.

No, we don't care if Bangladesh is secular or have landed on the Moon. It is not worth a tuppence to concern India. Why should one care about the inconsequential even if they howl and whine - please recognise us, we also exist and we have a thriving textile industry and you can go check it out on your Kolkata footpaths!!

 

[Tiki Tam Tam]

I will concede that Syhletis are good cooks and they run real good Indian restaurant in the UK.

You are mistaken that I am a rich Indian. My uncle, who is in UK, is. He employs a full time Syhleti cook and it is enjoyable a table he has when I visit my uncle!

 

[eastwatch]

If India was dirt poor, you would have been grovelling under the West Pakistani boot.

India has not come into the forefront suddenly. It always had the potential, but it was hamstrung with the socialistic pattern of life, where the womb to the tomb philosophy prevailed.

Liberalisation came into being and Indians found their place.

If the US is outsourcing to India, it is not because they love us, it is because we have the knowledge and expertise and they have no option!

Let us take a neutral place with equal opportunities for comparison i.e. the UK.

Here it proves that in every aspect Indians lead.



So, there you are!

No more whines please!

You should be in Jay Leno's show. You would bring the house down.

Jealous of Bangladesh?

A speck on the horizon of inconsequential effect on the world map.

What a circus!!

Tell me your achievement and give a comparative study with India and Pakistan.

Let it then be known who is Jealous!!



really?

have you been working in Indian household to know tht many Indian call her Aunty? Good to see you have read my post elsewhere and corrected your spelling.

Be gracious enough to thank me.

When your country is suffering from extreme poverty, you are clowning here to have come from a high family. Go out in the streets and report us what you have seen. Do not get out of your mind by reading the news article I have posted about the abject poverty of India and Indians like you. Even another 100 years of development will not cure your ills. Because your SECULAR country is infested with snobbery of a few while the entire country is dirt poor.

Our poverty rate has been downed to only 31.5%. Compare it with yours. Moreover, Indian poors number 5 times more than the entire population of Bangladesh. Here a camouflaged snob comes with a 50 year old backdated report to show BD is a 'bottomless basket case.' You must be a good joker.

 

[Tiki Tam Tam]

When your country is suffering from extreme poverty, you are clowning here to have come from a high family. Go out in the streets and report us what you have seen. Do not get out of your mind by reading the news article I have posted about the abject poverty of India and Indians like you. Even another 100 years of development will not cure your ills. Because your SECULAR country is infested with snobbery of a few while the entire country is dirt poor.

Our poverty rate has been downed to only 31.5%. Compare it with yours. Moreover, Indian poors number 5 times more than the entire population of Bangladesh. Here a camouflaged snob comes with a 50 year old backdated report to show BD is a 'bottomless basket case.' You must be a good joker.

Extreme poverty?

Your coloured vision speaks?

A person from a high family does not clown. He merely discourses to the underprivileged.

Yet, I do not understand what you mean by 'high family'. We manage with life. Is that 'high family'? Maybe by Bangladeshi poverty quotient, it is!!

Well, yes, being secular does give me a air of 'snobbery' as you put it. Why so? Because in my family, we have Hindus, Christians, Muslim, Buddhists, Indians and foreigners. It helps to understand humanity. And if one understands humanity, I presume, by your frog in the well vision, that would be clubbed as 'snobbery'!

Percentages go by the size of the population.

Got that in your little brain?

Check the GDP ,and more important, the PPP.

Expletives and crudeness is indicative of a peabrain, consumed by intense inferiority complex.

I don't grudge you your inferiority complex, since it is well deserved.

However, could I ask you to have a civil tongue in your head?

Or is that too much to ask of a Bangaldeshi given the facts of evolving history?

That Bangladesh was an international breadbasket case is well known. If I had given it from an Indian source, you would have raised the ear shattering howl. So, I quoted from an Islamic brother country i.e. Paksitan so that there was no doubt of the truth and the fact.

After all, as you said, your newspapers state that you should unite once again with Pakistan.

 

[Tiki Tam Tam]

How sad that whines, howls, expletives, crudeness and inferiority complex, oozing with schizophrenia, insecurity and paranoia is what one gets when they are overwhelmed by the fact that facts are conspicuous by their absence since they are just not there.

So sad.

But then DAWN is wrong.

In the 49th year from now in the past, Bangladesh became one of the leaders of Asia, nay, the world with money rolling all over and the granaries overflowing!!

It is hilarious how people can be so delusional.

What a pathetic state of mind.

It sure requires sympathy!