What's new

Hasina felt indebted to India for support: Wiki

IFB

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Aug 9, 2010
Messages
1,333
Reaction score
1
Country
India
Location
India
Dhaka: Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina felt "indebted" to India for supporting her during her imprisonment under the previous military-backed interim regime, and had authorised her adviser to open an exclusive channel of negotiation with New Delhi, unknown even to the Foreign Ministry.

The premier's foreign affairs adviser Gawher Rizvi told US Ambassador James Moriarty over the course of a meeting on October 24, 2009, how Hasina felt "indebted" to New Delhi, particularly to the Congress party, for supporting her during the difficult time, according to a US diplomatic document revealed by WikiLeaks.

The leaked US embassy cable said the adviser also told the envoy "in the strictest confidence" of how he had spent the previous week in India, having been empowered by the prime minister to open a separate negotiating channel with New Delhi making use of the wide range of contacts he maintained in the Indian capital.

Rizvi, a former Ford Foundation Representative in Delhi, also told Moriarty that he would again be leaving for India the very next day and that his activities took place through a "Prime Ministerial Channel".

He also said the channel unknown to anyone in Bangladesh outside the prime minister's office, and even the Foreign Ministry and the Indian High Commission in Dhaka were unaware of his activities.

While in India, the adviser had apparently met a dozen ministers and senior officials, including the then National Security Adviser M K Narayanan.

He also held meetings with the then Foreign Secretary Nirupama Rao, and remained "convinced" that the Indian government was committed to resolving a number of long- standing issues.

Rizvi did however, flag water sharing as the most difficult issue to be resolved between the two governments - a judgement that seems to have proven right with the much publicised failure to reach an agreement over sharing the waters of the Teesta recently.

Rizvi also informed the US ambassador that Indians were "pleased" with the level of cooperation on security issues, but viewed Bangladesh's lack of counterterrorism capacity as a major impediment.

The Foreign Ministry comes in for some severe criticism from Rizvi, who blames it for obstructing progress in several key areas, including Indian access to Ashuganj port and resolving the maritime boundary dispute.

The Indian government was apparently "annoyed" about Bangladesh seeking international arbitration without prior consultation.

http://zeenews.**********/news/nation/hasina-felt-indebted-to-india-for-support-wiki_734125.html
 
. . . .
How is this different to the strategic depth Indians accuse Pakistan of having in Afghanistan?
 
.
How is this different to the strategic depth Indians accuse Pakistan of having in Afghanistan?

Bangladesh - India helping a political party prez jailed by military dictators
Afghanistan - Pakistan sending armed Taliban and ensuring they overthrow the govt thru violent means..

You tell me the difference...
 
.
Bangladesh - India helping a political party prez jailed by military dictators
Afghanistan - Pakistan sending armed Taliban and ensuring they overthrow the govt thru violent means..

You tell me the difference...

Strategic depth is strategic depth. The Taliban were the legitimate Afghan government brought in by the Afghan people in the 90s. The US is currently negotiating with the Taliban, & asked the UN to remove its senior leaders from its 'blacklist'.
 
.
Strategic depth is strategic depth. The Taliban were the legitimate Afghan government brought in by the Afghan people in the 90s. The US is currently negotiating with the Taliban, & asked the UN to remove its senior leaders from its 'blacklist'.

since when is US a barometer of what's right and wrong for a Pakistani??

Strategic depth indicates mostly a state acting as a vassal state of the other.. While Pakistan tried to do that with Afghanistan though it lasted only a small duration, India and Bangladesh have never been in that kind of tango
 
.
Strategic depth is strategic depth. The Taliban were the legitimate Afghan government brought in by the Afghan people in the 90s. The US is currently negotiating with the Taliban, & asked the UN to remove its senior leaders from its 'blacklist'.

Bhai saab! Pehle aap zara FATA wapas le kar regular depth pe aa jayeen. Phir strategic depth mein dive karein :)

---------- Post added at 11:14 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:12 AM ----------

Why is the concept of democracy so difficult to grasp for muslim majority countries? Don't like your PM simple vote them out as oppose to assassinate or hang them?
 
. . .
arey bharat i toh shadhin korlo re toder.......noito toh pakistani army r guto khetis.......din rat ma boneder dharsan hoto....tokhon khub valo lagto na????.......ki khamata achhe toder.........jei thalai khas abar sei thalatei hagis!!!!!!!.........sala jatiyo songit tao toh ekjon bharotiyor theke tukli kore niechis.......proti din ato bangladeshi bharote dhoke j kolkatai amader pran osthagoto.......sob jana ache, din er por din border cross kore lok dhukchhe, bolchhe bangladesh khabar jote na tai peter daye asa.......tao abar boro boro kotha........

Seems you got lost in the middle of nowhere.
 
.
ahh..her image is ruined...Just dump her and buy khaleeda ...i think she is opposition leader...
 
. . .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom