Has PAF Created It's Own 'Spice' Bomb

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

I have a theory.

I think IAF intentionally missed the targets thinking that since its a drama there will be no retaliation and they can claim at home that they have killed terrorists. But we turned the narrative and termed the strikes as a failure. IAF back home couldn't say that the intent was to show resolve but if they said that they deliberately missed it would mean that the building was not a terrorist camp. It would have created a backlash on global stage.

IMO, it’s some EW stuffs in action....

Lesson to learn: don’t buy “commercial” defense stuffs, having something to do with EM waves, if you can’t modify them

 

[Sinnerman108]

Spice uses satellite images to memorise the target and then guides itself to that target once dropped. Spice has been used by Israel several times in Syria & Iraq and hence Pakistan may already have got some bombs long time back. But to use it, Pakistan needs extensive network of accurate satellite cameras.

Even India does not make Spice bombs as India does not find meaning in making Spice as it is difficult to be used during major wars. Spice is only good for limited warfare due to its accuracy. But during major war, it is hard to take satellite images of every target and hence Spice becomes ineffiicient.

Our cruise missiles have been using that technology, even before the glide bombs.

 

[crankthatskunk]

There have been occasions when PDF admin was asked to remove certain items from the forum and there have been a time when certain information wasn't touched.... albeit authentic but not considered a threat to national interests.....so don't lose any sleep over it'

Well, you are confirming it that your information holds no value for the authorities to be, otherwise it would have been removed, if found sensitive.

So what exactly is your dilemma then?

Who said I have one!!! You should look in the mirror to find the answer to that question.

Exposed, Lol....neither do I get any medals for posting stuff, neither it costs you a dime....I don't think members here suffer from a memory loss that I expect them to forget what I posted here five weeks or five years earlier....
When a person makes a new statement or discloses fresh info on a subject, what is one expected to do, use the material available to be inquisitive or look to heavens for some new miracle'

I don't have time to worry about your little tittle tattle otherwise, it could be proven the pictures were not shared by you. But even if they were, taking your statement at face value, there is no doubt that you have now admitted that you are in fact steering a cold, old soup.

It seems in your enthusiasm you haven't been following some other insiders as well....as dummy bomb wasn't the only explanation given....

Did I say anywhere, I am here to follow insiders!!

Keep doing it if you are following them.

As for me if I need to know something, I can get it from horses's mouth, so to speak. I would just say, you have no idea and I am not one for boosting.

Read through the thread again slowly and as @airomerix said to try to understand the psyche of the subject....it's a learning process for all of us or else you can just stick to topics like Bangladesh buying JF-17s.

Precisely , learn, don't teach, do not pretend that you have inside information, because you don't. That too according to your own friend @airomerix.

Over and out.

 

[Smarana Mitra]

Our cruise missiles have been using that technology, even before the glide bombs.

Even Tomahawk does nt have such technology. The reason why cruise missiles don't carry such technology is that when one is having a long range attack, the target is very hard to be radar painted. Secondly, the satellite images are taken from above whereas cruise missiles fly low and hence the image won't match. It is almost impossible to take low flying image of enemy territory to be useful for satellite image

 

[Windjammer]

Well, you are confirming it that your information holds no value for the authorities to be, otherwise it would have been removed, if found sensitive.

You can read as what you would like to read....but
And where did I exactly say that it was my info that wasn't removed !!!

Who said I have one!!! You should look in the mirror to find the answer to that question.

You finding the subject hard to digest just proves that.

I don't have time to worry about your little tittle tattle otherwise, it could be proven the pictures were not shared by you. But even if they were, taking your statement at face value, there is no doubt that you have now admitted that you are in fact steering a cold, old soup.

Is that why you are behaving like a headless Chicken for the last few pages.....you are dense mate.

Did I say anywhere, I am here to follow insiders!!

Keep doing it if you are following them.

Now let's see...case of memory lapse perhaps.....

someone, who also claims to be the insider, said that it is a dummy bomb.

As for me if I need to know something, I can get it from horses's mouth, so to speak. I would just say, you have no idea and I am not one for boosting.

If that's not boasting than what is....wave high and whisper in the hallow wind.

Precisely , learn, don't teach, do not pretend that you have inside information, because you don't. That too according to your own friend @airomerix.

Over and out.

Learn what that Bangladesh is buying JF-17s.....was that from the so-called Horse's mouth....na that is your corner mate....I don't belong to that class....besides it's also obvious you have major comprehension issues.

 

[StormBreaker]

You can read as what you would like to read....but
And where did I exactly say that it was my info that wasn't removed !!!


You finding the subject hard to digest just proves that.


Is that why you are behaving like a headless Chicken for the last few pages.....you are dense mate.


Now let's see...case of memory lapse perhaps.....



If that's not boasting than what is....wave high and whisper in the hallow wind.



Learn what that Bangladesh is buying JF-17s.....was that from the so-called Horse's mouth....na that is your corner mate....I don't belong to that class....besides it's also obvious you have major comprehension issues.

Is Bangladesh buying Thunders ?

 

[aliyusuf]

Is Bangladesh buying Thunders ?

No brother. Perish the thought. It's not the Bengali military I'm wary of, but the Awami League govt of Sheikh Hasina.
Total sell out stooge of India.

 

[StormBreaker]

No brother. Perish the thought. It's not the Bengali I'm military wary of, but the Awami League govt of Sheikh Hasina. Total sell out stooge of India.

Yes that fact is what made me confused

 

[Windjammer]

Is Bangladesh buying Thunders ?

It was a claim by the above member who has no other contribution except to troll and ruins this thread.....maybe he's cheesed off that his thread was locked.....

 

[airomerix]

Thank you for making my point. "No one has either the capacity or the required knowledge" Case closed my friend.

If this was your entire point then i'm sorry you have serious issues with cognitive and critical thinking ability.

The purpose of this forum is not. to get inside information that can potentially sabotage the security apparatus of Pakistan. It is just to educate the masses pertaining to fairly complex and enclosed institutions and their assets - Military.

it's a good past time for many and comes out to be highly productive.

But as practice is, you still didn't resist to equate yourself with the competent agencies.
Are you a spokesperson for competent agencies!!!

Again you didn't hesitate to practice selection bias. I equated myself to PDF members aswell. And as someone who gets to have a fair amount of dialogues with these 'competent agencies', I can say this with 100% certitude that PDF is an asset for Pakistan even without sharing sensitive information.

Get your act together. You are embarrassing yourself and wasting our time.

Well, you are confirming it that your information holds no value for the authorities to be, otherwise it would have been removed, if found sensitive.

Who said the only valuable information is a piece of 'sensitive information'? Are you for real?

I don't have time to worry about your little tittle tattle otherwise, it could be proven the pictures were not shared by you. But even if they were, taking your statement at face value, there is no doubt that you have now admitted that you are in fact steering a cold, old soup.

Irrelevant.

Did I say anywhere, I am here to follow insiders!!

This is how you sound precisely.

Precisely , learn, don't teach, do not pretend that you have inside information, because you don't. That too according to your own friend @airomerix.

Over and out.

Do not misquote me please.