What's new

Hang me if I am guilty, Narendra Modi tells Urdu weekly

Communal violence is a self termed thing

For some 1969 was a secular riot , kashmir pundits ethnic cleansing was also secular but 2002 post godhara riots were communal as they could not get an upper hand:rolleyes:


BTW there is also a secular riot going on in ASSAM soon bodos will be lost tribes.HAIL Indian politics.


AWAKE else you will be minority in your OWN state like kerala , WB ,ASSAM ,kashmir and NE states.

Adding to your statement ,Still Chief minister Tarun gogoi saying that Assam is not burning. Why should this tarun gogoi be not hanged?
 
.
I did note that you have underlined a few things, I get your views in a broader sense,

No it is not a few coalition parties if you are referring to the DMK - the 70,000 crore CWG was done by the Congress, the Adarsh scaam by the Congress, the 'Coal'gate by Congress, the 2G scam in which Raja was made a scapegoat was actually by Chidamabaram..again congress.

I live in Karnataka, and I know the scams which are attributed to the BJP government. No action has been taken against then, the corrupt former CM even got his man to the present CM, so he's the one who controls the present government.

As I said, you want to support Congress because as a minority you cant think of voting for BJP out of idealogical compulsions..but again since you dont want to say that openly, you bring in the 'minority' card to justify it. No need bro, everyone is free to vote for whichever party he/she feels looks after his/her interests. Never mind about the country.

Yes I will vote for any party that works best for my interest, and I don't think there is any law from stopping me from doing so. And also you said Never mind about the country, I know what the BJP has done in my state.
 
.
so he knows about Ajmal kasab :agree:

on serious note anyone know when was the last time a capital punishment carried out before the President putting his/ her nose :undecided:
 
.
I did note that you have underlined a few things, I get your views in a broader sense,



I live in Karnataka, and I know the scams which are attributed to the BJP government. No action has been taken against then, the corrupt former CM even got his man to the present CM, so he's the one who controls the present government.



Yes I will vote for any party that works best for my interest, and I don't think there is any law from stopping me from doing so. And also you said Never mind about the country, I know what the BJP has done in my state.

Yes there is a concept of lesser of two evils. and BJP has not done that bad as compared to the Congress.

Also I agree and defend you right to vote for whatever party which looks after your interests...lets just not hide behind technicalities/propaganda like "Modi is bad for minorities", " I would vote for BJP but Modi scares me" etc to say that. You think Congress will look after the interests of Christians better than BJP, fine vote for them. If I think BJP looks after the interests of Hindus better than Congress, I will vote for it. Let the best man (or the man with most votes) win.
 
.
Yes there is a concept of lesser of two evils. and BJP has not done that bad as compared to the Congress.

Debatable. But lets leave it for now :)

Also I agree and defend you right to vote for whatever party which looks after your interests...lets just not hide behind technicalities/propaganda like "Modi is bad for minorities", " I would vote for BJP but Modi scares me" etc to say that. You think Congress will look after the interests of Christians better than BJP, fine vote for them. If I think BJP looks after the interests of Hindus better than Congress, I will vote for it. Let the best man (or the man with most votes) win.

For me its not any propaganda, I am just telling about how the minorities feel about Modi. And yeah let the best man win :)
 
.
Adding to your statement ,Still Chief minister Tarun gogoi saying that Assam is not burning. Why should this tarun gogoi be not hanged?

because tarun gogoi is "peace"ful and "sick"ular

do any crime unless and until you have power of these two povar-full forces you will enjoy tea with PM as shree dharmnirpeksha jagdeesh tytler ji did.
 
. .
I am just telling about how the minorities feel about Modi. And yeah let the best man win :)

First let us make one thing clear about the term minorities - I hope you are referring only to Christians and Muslims. Because other than that I dont think any others have any 'problem' with him.

Secondly I'm saying that 'feeling' is a result of a decade old vilification campaign against him without any proof. I mean , comon, if he is indeed guilty as anyone claims, how come he is not even named in the chargesheet of any major riot cases, let alone proof of his involvement be established ? Come to think of it, the vilification campaign against Modi - which is unprecedented in Indian political history - is more of a political nature than of a judicial or legal nature. The Congress, hand-in-glove with the english media houses just wants to keep the minorities in a perpetual state of fear regarding their survival under Modi. Some people who are versed in the knowledge of googling figure that out, sadly many dont and buy that propaganda hook,line and sinker.
 
.
Debatable. But lets leave it for now :)



For me its not any propaganda, I am just telling about how the minorities feel about Modi. And yeah let the best man win :)

But I do not understand without analyzing ground realities how can someone feel like that about any person in world leave modi aside? I believe your feeling is result of false propaganda spread by so called sponsored machineries which is common now these days.
 
.
Security in the religious sense is not what the minorities want, we live in a secular country we have the rights to demand it(and we get it as well). And economically I think the government is doing its best, its just a few corrupt parties in the coalition which are screwing things up and moreover its not just our country a lot of countries which are fairing badly at this point.
you are talking as if the coalition parties are alone to be blamed, the Congress has more corrupt than any other party in the political stage of the planet. From that point I can sure say that you are a Congree. and let me remind you that you and your party are not getting elected back to the center in 2014.
and regarding the global economy, its a blatent excuse for COngresees to put the blame on some one else.
 
.
For me there is little difference between Narendra Modi and Osama bin Laden.

Both are terrorists and dono hi masoomiyat claim karte hain/thay...

Dialogue maar raha hai as he knows nobody is going to trap him
 
.
First let us make one thing clear about the term minorities - I hope you are referring only to Christians and Muslims. Because other than that I dont think any others have any 'problem' with him.

Secondly I'm saying that 'feeling' is a result of a decade old vilification campaign against him without any proof. I mean , comon, if he is indeed guilty as anyone claims, how come he is not even named in the chargesheet of any major riot cases, let alone proof of his involvement be established ? Come to think of it, the vilification campaign against Modi - which is unprecedented in Indian political history - is more of a political nature than of a judicial or legal nature. The Congress, hand-in-glove with the english media houses just wants to keep the minorities in a perpetual state of fear regarding their survival under Modi. Some people who are versed in the knowledge of googling figure that out, sadly many dont and buy that propaganda hook,line and sinker.
you are talking to a Christian who will worship the Italian Catholic woman, just forget it.

For me there is little difference between Narendra Modi and Osama bin Laden.

Both are terrorists and dono hi masoomiyat claim karte hain/thay...

Dialogue maar raha hai as he knows nobody is going to trap him
prove it in the house of law about MODI,
you being a moderator should know that personal opinions can not result in making a man as guilty with out proof.
 
. .
For me there is little difference between Narendra Modi and Osama bin Laden.

Both are terrorists and dono hi masoomiyat claim karte hain/thay...

Dialogue maar raha hai as he knows nobody is going to trap him


osama ne kab mossomiat claim ki:lol:woto khuleam chillata tha video me

usne to bush tak ko sath ane ki daawat di thi:rofl:
 
.
Shahid Siddiqui, editor of the Urdu-language weekly newspaper Nai Duniya , recently spoke to Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi in a rare interview. During the hour long conversation, Mr. Modi defended his actions during the 2002 riots in his state that left hundreds dead, discussed the long court battles that followed and asked why Gujarat is being “targeted” by critics.
Mr. Modi is considered one of the Bharatiya Janata Party’s strongest candidates for prime minister in the upcoming 2014 elections, but the legacy of the Gujarat riots has also made him one of India’s mostcontroversial and divisive politicians. Mr. Siddiqui, a former member of Parliament from Uttar Pradesh, supplied an audio file of the interview to India Ink. The interview was translated from Urdu and excerpted by Raksha Kumar .
Q.
There are a lot of questions on the riots forthe past 20 years. Those who were burnt inthe train in Godhra, their bodies were brought back to Ahmedabad. Why did you decide to do this? Did you not understand the repercussions of this? A.
I have answered this question in detail to the SIT [Special Investigation Team] and the Supreme Court. No matter whose body it is, it needs to be returned to the families,right? It was not right for everyone to go toGodhra where there was tension. The second thing is that this train was going to Ahmedabad, and the passengers were all going to Ahmebadad. So how do you get the bodies to reach their families? Q.
You could have silently brought it to the hospitals and handed them over. A.
That is exactly how it happened. (laughs) Q.
Didn’t you take them out on a procession? A.
No. Listen to the truth. There is no place in Godhra to keep so many bodies, it is an administrative decision as to how to manage these? Now, all the bodies had to go to north [Ahmedabad], so the question was do we shift it individually or as a huge lot? Do we shift it in the morning or at night? The administration felt that we should shift it at night to reduce tension. The civil hospital in Ahmedabad is congested. And in 2001, it was in the outskirts. So, 16 bodies were brought into the civil hospital. There was no procession. Q.
When the riots broke out, you would have gotten the information that people are dying? What did you do to stop it? A.
We announced a curfew, appealed to people to be peaceful. My first appeal was to Godhra, to let the police do their duty. The entire police force was asked to get on this job. There had never been a riot this big in India before, and the first riot in the age of 24X7 media. Earlier the governmenthad the time to organize its machinery as the news broke out only in the following day’s newspapers. There will surely be a difference in the speed of the television and police movement! Forces had to compete with the speed of TV news.
Let me tell you what happened in the first 72 hours:
There hasn’t been even one police gun shot, no lathi charge. There was lathi charge where Indira Gandhi’s dead body was kept. They did it there to control the crowds. But, here people were arrested in advance. Q.
But your officials, police and some in the media reported you having told the people to vent out their anger in the first 48 hours? Even Haren Pandya [the late home minister of the state] had said that. A.
The Supreme Court asked for an investigation to be conducted. We should trust that. Q.
Did you tell the police to stop the rioting at any cost? A.
Of course! There are shoot at sight orders I gave the police. That is public. Q.
Even at that time I had heard that people were identified and burnt, as though the whole thing was pre-planned. A.
It is all a lie. Instead, think about how manyMuslims were protected then! If they were to be killed systematically, who would havebeen spared today? Q.
But they say you were in the control room. A.
The SC [Supreme Court] team has investigated this. Wait until their report is submitted. Q.
Did you go to the refugee camps yourself? A.
I went everywhere and investigated. There used to be PILs [public interest litigation] in the Gujarat High Court very often those days. And some judgements say that the best facilities were provided to the refugees. Q.
What did the PM say to you at that point? A.
There is a video on that. Atalji [Atal Bihari Vajpayee] said that he has trust in me. Q.
Senior Congress leaders including Rajiv Gandhi apologized after 1984 [communal riots]. And [Jagdish] Tytler was made to quit politics. You haven’t regretted your actions or apologized until now. It has been10 years. You should have done it as a headof state. A.
You should see the statements I made at that point. From that you will understand what Modi thinks and believes. There was a2005 interview of mine with Prabhu Chawla. He asked me the same question and I told him, why should I apologize? If a government is responsible for this, then it should be hanged in the middle of the road.And they should be hanged as a deterrent –so that no administrator dares to do this again. They should not be forgiven, because that is encouraging the crime. If Modi has sinned, then Modi should be hanged. But, even after trying sincerely to save many lives, some people want to badmouth me due to political reasons, then I cant answer them. Q.
Is there some sorrow in your heart about what happened? That you couldn’t stop it? A.
First, I think I managed to stop the rioting. Iwill not admit that I couldn’t. Q.
If a correspondent of mine gives me wronginformation and I print it, then I, as an editor, will apologize. There will be a case against me, not him. A.
I will give you all the documents with my statements. And if you are convinced that I was not involved in it, then you should also publish that you were harsh on me. Then you should say that for the past 10 years we have defamed Modi and you should apologize to me. Q.
Even after the riots, your administration was not willing to deliver justice until the Supreme Court intervened. There was no SIT, the accused were all acquitted. A.
You are mistaken. The SIT deals with only 8-9 cases, here there have been thousands of FIRs [First Information Report] and arrests. Not one person was punished in 1984 riots. Justice has been delivered in more than 50 cases in my state. Only Best Bakery and Bilkis Bano cases have been moved to other states. Q.
Why were there so many fake encounters in your admin? A.
Let me tell you what is happening in the state where you are an MP [Member of Parliament] from – Uttar Pradesh.
Mayawati had said she made 396 encounters to maintain normalcy. In my state there were just 12 encounters.
The national human rights commission has said that in the last 10 years (in this country) 400 have been fake. There is an appeal in the supreme court that these should be re-investigated. So, it is a national issue, why is Gujarat being targeted. If you want to talk about Gujarat, talk about UP , talk about the rest of the country.

Shahid Siddiqui, editor of the Urdu-language weekly newspaper Nai Duniya , recently spoke to Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi in a rare interview. During the hour long conversation, Mr. Modi defended his actions during the 2002 riots in his state that left hundreds dead, discussed the long court battles that followed and asked why Gujarat is being ¡°targeted¡± by critics.
Mr. Modi is considered one of the Bharatiya Janata Party¡¯s strongest candidates for prime minister in the upcoming 2014 elections, but the legacy of the Gujarat riots has also made him one of India¡¯s mostcontroversial and divisive politicians. Mr. Siddiqui, a former member of Parliament from Uttar Pradesh, supplied an audio file of the interview to India Ink. The interview was translated from Urdu and excerpted by Raksha Kumar .
Q.
There are a lot of questions on the riots forthe past 20 years. Those who were burnt inthe train in Godhra, their bodies were brought back to Ahmedabad. Why did you decide to do this? Did you not understand the repercussions of this? A.
I have answered this question in detail to the SIT [Special Investigation Team] and the Supreme Court. No matter whose body it is, it needs to be returned to the families,right? It was not right for everyone to go toGodhra where there was tension. The second thing is that this train was going to Ahmedabad, and the passengers were all going to Ahmebadad. So how do you get the bodies to reach their families? Q.
You could have silently brought it to the hospitals and handed them over. A.
That is exactly how it happened. (laughs) Q.
Didn¡¯t you take them out on a procession? A.
No. Listen to the truth. There is no place in Godhra to keep so many bodies, it is an administrative decision as to how to manage these? Now, all the bodies had to go to north [Ahmedabad], so the question was do we shift it individually or as a huge lot? Do we shift it in the morning or at night? The administration felt that we should shift it at night to reduce tension. The civil hospital in Ahmedabad is congested. And in 2001, it was in the outskirts. So, 16 bodies were brought into the civil hospital. There was no procession. Q.
When the riots broke out, you would have gotten the information that people are dying? What did you do to stop it? A.
We announced a curfew, appealed to people to be peaceful. My first appeal was to Godhra, to let the police do their duty. The entire police force was asked to get on this job. There had never been a riot this big in India before, and the first riot in the age of 24X7 media. Earlier the governmenthad the time to organize its machinery as the news broke out only in the following day¡¯s newspapers. There will surely be a difference in the speed of the television and police movement! Forces had to compete with the speed of TV news.
Let me tell you what happened in the first 72 hours:
There hasn¡¯t been even one police gun shot, no lathi charge. There was lathi charge where Indira Gandhi¡¯s dead body was kept. They did it there to control the crowds. But, here people were arrested in advance. Q.
But your officials, police and some in the media reported you having told the people to vent out their anger in the first 48 hours? Even Haren Pandya [the late home minister of the state] had said that. A.
The Supreme Court asked for an investigation to be conducted. We should trust that. Q.
Did you tell the police to stop the rioting at any cost? A.
Of course! There are shoot at sight orders I gave the police. That is public. Q.
Even at that time I had heard that people were identified and burnt, as though the whole thing was pre-planned. A.
It is all a lie. Instead, think about how manyMuslims were protected then! If they were to be killed systematically, who would havebeen spared today? Q.
But they say you were in the control room. A.
The SC [Supreme Court] team has investigated this. Wait until their report is submitted. Q.
Did you go to the refugee camps yourself? A.
I went everywhere and investigated. There used to be PILs [public interest litigation] in the Gujarat High Court very often those days. And some judgements say that the best facilities were provided to the refugees. Q.
What did the PM say to you at that point? A.
There is a video on that. Atalji [Atal Bihari Vajpayee] said that he has trust in me. Q.
Senior Congress leaders including Rajiv Gandhi apologized after 1984 [communal riots]. And [Jagdish] Tytler was made to quit politics. You haven¡¯t regretted your actions or apologized until now. It has been10 years. You should have done it as a headof state. A.
You should see the statements I made at that point. From that you will understand what Modi thinks and believes. There was a2005 interview of mine with Prabhu Chawla. He asked me the same question and I told him, why should I apologize? If a government is responsible for this, then it should be hanged in the middle of the road.And they should be hanged as a deterrent ¨Cso that no administrator dares to do this again. They should not be forgiven, because that is encouraging the crime. If Modi has sinned, then Modi should be hanged. But, even after trying sincerely to save many lives, some people want to badmouth me due to political reasons, then I cant answer them. Q.
Is there some sorrow in your heart about what happened? That you couldn¡¯t stop it? A.
First, I think I managed to stop the rioting. Iwill not admit that I couldn¡¯t. Q.
If a correspondent of mine gives me wronginformation and I print it, then I, as an editor, will apologize. There will be a case against me, not him. A.
I will give you all the documents with my statements. And if you are convinced that I was not involved in it, then you should also publish that you were harsh on me. Then you should say that for the past 10 years we have defamed Modi and you should apologize to me. Q.
Even after the riots, your administration was not willing to deliver justice until the Supreme Court intervened. There was no SIT, the accused were all acquitted. A.
You are mistaken. The SIT deals with only 8-9 cases, here there have been thousands of FIRs [First Information Report] and arrests. Not one person was punished in 1984 riots. Justice has been delivered in more than 50 cases in my state. Only Best Bakery and Bilkis Bano cases have been moved to other states. Q.
Why were there so many fake encounters in your admin? A.
Let me tell you what is happening in the state where you are an MP [Member of Parliament] from ¨C Uttar Pradesh.
Mayawati had said she made 396 encounters to maintain normalcy. In my state there were just 12 encounters.
The national human rights commission has said that in the last 10 years (in this country) 400 have been fake. There is an appeal in the supreme court that these should be re-investigated. So, it is a national issue, why is Gujarat being targeted. If you want to talk about Gujarat, talk about UP , talk about the rest of the country.

Narendra Modi Defends His Actions in 2002 Riots - NYTimes.com
 
.
Back
Top Bottom