Jackdaws
BANNED
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2010
- Messages
- 13,114
- Reaction score
- -49
- Country
- Location
Hmmm?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hmmm?
Hindus do similar things in Indian masjids too. False flag operations are very common.
I am not surprised. One thing I have noticed is that Muslims also do crimes - but they have a conscience. Hindus mostly don't. They don't even feel bad doing evil stuff to Muslims.This guy was all over the place in Pakistan. Too bad his Indian call got intercepted and he got nailed.
Today India has abandoned its spy. He is rotting in our jails. Answering for his crimes each minute of the day.
I am not surprised. One thing I have noticed is that Muslims also do crimes - but they have a conscience. Hindus mostly don't. They don't even feel bad doing evil stuff to Muslims.
Stop evading my question.
What to do with Yadhav? You cry about Hafiz Saeed yet he walks freely. You cry foul about your terrorist who is in our captivity. The contrast is mindboggling.
Jadhav - if he is a terrorist, by all means hang him. It is your right as a sovereign nation. But as a sovereign nation which exists in the comity of nations, it is also your duty to give him consular access and the right to a fair trial. We don't even know the name of his defense attorney. Why the cloak and dagger game? Just make all information public. It would embarrass India even more, no?
You first have to be convicted on a terrorism charge. You get consular access before you are pronounced guilty. That's how the law works. Innocent until proven guilty - ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negatTerrorists aren't given consular access. Consular access is for normal human beings. Not for a murderer who has killed countless innocent people.
You first have to be convicted on a terrorism charge. You get consular access before you are pronounced guilty. That's how the law works. Innocent until proven guilty - ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat
As I said, do whatever you want to do with him.What more proof do you need? We caught an Indian spy red-handed. Why was he in Pakistan preaching in a mosque and pretending he was a Pakistani?
The contrast speaks volume. One country screams terror, yet its own spy is caught in the act.
How can we take your word seriously? You got no arguments because you are part of the problem.
OK. Do you know the legal aspects - "due process of law" and "burden of proof"?It has been proved. The Indian spy was caught on Pakistani soil whilst carrying out illegal activities disguised as a fake Imam.
How else did we capture him? Did you hand him over to us? There is zero legal ground here. Just face it. The guy was busted because you did a terrible job.
Consular access is not for terrorists.
Wonderful! How come killing innocent like Kasab did can attribute to having a conscience?I am not surprised. One thing I have noticed is that Muslims also do crimes - but they have a conscience. Hindus mostly don't. They don't even feel bad doing evil stuff to Muslims.
Kasab was most likely a Hindu man. Perhaps RSS?Wonderful! How come killing innocent like Kasab did can attribute to having a conscience?
Wonderful! How come killing innocent like Kasab did can attribute to having a conscience?
How do you know that? What makes you think that?Kasab was most likely a Hindu man. Perhaps RSS?