maqsad
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2007
- Messages
- 648
- Reaction score
- 0
So which generals are said to have killed him, what are their names? Are they retired now or are they still in uniform, if the accusation is being made then why aren't the names being mentioned and their possible roles discussed?
Also, this unsigned letter in the hands of one and only one British journalist paints a picture in the reader's eye that Gen. Alvi was a fanatic hardliner when it came to getting tough on "taliban militants" but that article makes no mention of the fact that General Alvi refused to participate in the pak army's very controversial attack on Lal Masjid. Not only was Gen. Alvi not jumping at the thought of attacking civilians in Lal Masjid but he walked away from the opportunity and got fired for it. That is quite an odd contradiction. What conclusive evidence do we have that the only reason Gen Alvi was a target was because he was complaining about backroom deals with Baitullah Mehsud? Perhaps Gen Alvi was feared because he may have been planning to expose something quite different than backroom deals with tribal militants.
Also, this unsigned letter in the hands of one and only one British journalist paints a picture in the reader's eye that Gen. Alvi was a fanatic hardliner when it came to getting tough on "taliban militants" but that article makes no mention of the fact that General Alvi refused to participate in the pak army's very controversial attack on Lal Masjid. Not only was Gen. Alvi not jumping at the thought of attacking civilians in Lal Masjid but he walked away from the opportunity and got fired for it. That is quite an odd contradiction. What conclusive evidence do we have that the only reason Gen Alvi was a target was because he was complaining about backroom deals with Baitullah Mehsud? Perhaps Gen Alvi was feared because he may have been planning to expose something quite different than backroom deals with tribal militants.