Doesn't change the fact that France was the front runner for Libyan ops and as per NATO agreement US helped out, secondly Pakistanis leaders take money and the drones use to fly out of Pakistani airbases so saying that they do not agree is foolish and African countries never protest so they must agree as well or someone would take up the matter with the UN by now.
Actually UN set up commission to investigate US drone killings, but what you miss - even if countries are too weak to stand up to US, it doesnt make such extrajudicial murders right.
Or you think: "Hey, we bought that government (or they are too weak), lets kill
anyone we
think might be connected to terrorists. No trial, no evidence, just kill them all!" How legal do you think it is?
and as for Syria Bashar is equal to blame for the carnage as he refuses to step down or at least have some kind of elections.
As I said, you in US dont get even half of the picture of whats going on.
1. Why sovereign country should listen to the orders of other countries about their government system? Would you agree US
should listen to the orders of Iran and change their system to other countries liking? Or should Obama step down, because other countries demand that?
As long as majority of that country citizens are supporting their government, they should run the country as they see fit. Like in Syria, or Iran, or US, or whatever.
2. Syria already has new constitution, new free Parliamentary elections, and Assad suggested free presidential elections with UN supervision, and even said he wouldnt participate in them, although he didnt had to - he has the support of majority of Syrians. Guess what -
US with alies rejected, and demanded to hand over the power to their assigned people. Let this sink in, US couldnt care less what Syrians want, US wants to install puppet regime in Syria, thats it.
3. How can Assad be "equally blamed for the carnage." Since then to defend the country is a crime, and equal to terrorists crimes? Thats just strange thinking.