Gujarat model is exclusive, not the best

[SarthakGanguly]

Reply with quotes, sources.

If that is the case the entire thread is troll....for the fake Modi claims...

 

[SRP]

@Asskicker Are we all blind? Why the hell you used that kind of big fonts.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

Exactly that precisely was a major point.

@Asskicker Are we all blind? Why the hell you used that kind of big fonts.

 

[Asskicker]

Reply with quotes, sources.

The guy who is prime responsible for gujarat riots in 2002, is going a next PM Candidate.Cool.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

Proved by Supreme Court of Saudi Arabia?

The guy who is prime responsible for gujarat riots in 2002, is going a next PM Candidate.Cool.

"Cool" - Sure

 

[Indianpatriot1]

The guy who is prime responsible for gujarat riots in 2002, is going a next PM Candidate.Cool.

Tell that to the Supreme Court. They are not so sure.

 

[Asskicker]

Proved by Supreme Court of Saudi Arabia?

"Cool" - Sure

Dude let me give you a simple eg:Every one in the world knows all politicians are corrupted ,still they prove to be innocent and Mahatmas how...?

 

[he-man]

The guy who is prime responsible for gujarat riots in 2002, is going a next PM Candidate.Cool.

and where were u when rajiv gandhi became prime minister after sikh riots??

And who started 2002 riots??

muslims burned sabarmati express burning 59 hindus alive!!! and then they expect no retaliation!!

 

[Asskicker]

Tell that to the Supreme Court. They are not so sure.

You mean supreme court ,its a joke .Why it took supreme court so long to hang ajmal kasab.Even after so many proofs.

 

[AnnoyingOrange]

The BJP launched its Modi campaign for the elections with a meeting in Hyderabad on August 11. The party perceives Narendra Modi’s greatness to lie in the developmental model he has adopted in his home state of Gujarat, which is said to have outperformed all other states during his rule.

Though there is opposition to him within the BJP, the party is likely to support Modi as its prime ministerial candidate for this reason. A section of the big industrial lobby of India is actively supporting him.

In his Hyderabad speech, Modi ridiculed the development of Andhra Pradesh and promised the people that if they adopt the Gujarat model, their situation will change.

Andhra Pradesh has some standing in development and inclusive welfarism. But Modi did not give it any credit for its existing economic status. Though Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Kiran Kumar Reddy countered his attack, Modi carried the media with him. We, therefore, must see how Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat compare in terms of development.

According to the 2011 Census, Andhra Pradesh has a population of 84,655,533 and Gujarat’s population is 60,383,628. AP’s 2013-14 budget outlay is Rs1,61,348 crore. The outlay of Gu*jarat in the same year is Rs 1,14,450 crore. The per capita share in AP’s outlay is Rs 1.91 lakh, whereas in Gujarat it is Rs 1.9 lakh.

If the AP and Gujarat governments simply decide to distribute this budget money per head, every man/woman/child in AP gets Rs 1,000 more than a Gujarati man/woman/child does.

This indicator shows that Gujarat is behind AP, a state ruled by the Congress, which has faced turbulent times from 2009 onwards with frequent agitations on the regional issue. Gujarat has been ruled by Modi for the last 12 years. During that period AP has been ruled by four chief ministers, yet, its resource mobilisation capacity is better than that of Gujarat.

If Gujarat was better industrialised than AP, it would have been visible in its resource mobilisation. Or, if Gujarat is better developed in agriculture, including its dairy economy, it would have shown in its resource mobilisation as well. When the Gujarat government does not have a better income than the AP government, the question of its better investment in public welfare schemes does not arise.

A well developed state must take its people, particularly the poor — and in India’s case, especially the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes — into account for better and focused spending on human development. Any balanced government would also have to focus on religious minorities, particularly Muslims, whose condition was shown to be equally bad in the Sachar Committee report.

A state government that is developing better than any other state must be able to show that its developmental proposals are better than others, particularly in improving the life of disadvantageous social groups. Let us compare the plan proposals of Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat for this year.

AP’s plan budget for 2013-14 is Rs 59,422 crore, whereas the Gujarat plan budget is Rs 58,500 crore. In AP’s plan budget, under the new, legalised Scheduled Caste special component, Rs 8,585 crore is allocated. The Gujarat government allocated Rs 1,838 core for development of the Scheduled Caste.

According to the 2011 Census, AP’s Scheduled Caste population is 12,339,496, while Gujarat’s SC population is 3,592,715. Andhra Pradesh has planned to invest Rs 69,573 in every SC person under this plan. Gujarat has planned to invest Rs 51,159 in every SC person under its welfare schemes.

For tribal development, the Andhra Pradesh government has allocated Rs 3,666 core for a population of 5,024,104 Scheduled Tribes. Gujarat has allocated Rs 1,832 crore for a population of 7,481,160 STs. The AP government has decided to invest Rs 51,159 per ST person; the Gujarat government, on the other hand, has decided to invest just Rs 24,488 per person.

For minorities, the AP government has allocated Rs 1,027 crore, whereas the Gujarat government has allocated just Rs 131 crore. Andhra Pradesh has a minority population of 8,273,654 and Gujarat has a minority population of 5,494,365.

Surprisingly, the AP government allocates Rs 12,413 per each minority person, whereas the Gujarat government allocates just Rs 2,384. In the AP government’s plan proposals, the category “minority” appears in several places. In Gujarat’s proposals, the word “minority” appears only twi*ce. The Modi government’s aversion to the word “minority” and its reluctance to allocate money for their development match.

AP’s allocations for this year proved to be much more robust and far more people-centric than Gujarat’s. This was not be*cause of the largesse of the rulers, but because of the assertion of the people of AP.

Such assertion seems to be absolutely absent in Gujarat. The Gujarat government’s apathy towards tribals, leave alone minorities, speaks volumes. In fact, there is no evidence that Modi allowed capable leadership to grow which would allow them to assert themselves.

For example, the tribal and dalit intelligentsia in Andhra Pradesh emerged from quality residential schools and colleges that the state government initiated way back in the 1980s and ’90s. Modi’s government did not initiate such educational projects for the Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes.

With this reality, how can Modi go round the country claiming that the Gujarat model is the best and that it should be adopted by the whole nation?


Source: Gujarat model is exclusive, not the best | Deccan Chronicle

Who needs the best.. we just need a model that works for India.. and right now Gujrat model is our best option.

 

[he-man]

You mean supreme court ,its a joke .Why it took supreme court so long to hang ajmal kasab.Even after so many proofs.

sure.....but answer my post 23 first

 

[SRP]

and where were u when rajiv gandhi became prime minister after sikh riots??

And who started 2002 riots??

muslims burned sabarmati express burning 59 hindus alive!!! and then they expect no retaliation!!

Nah in this secoolar country muslims have right to kill hindu's and if hindu's responds them we are communal. Prime example is latest violence in UP.

You mean supreme court ,its a joke .Why it took supreme court so long to hang ajmal kasab.Even after so many proofs.

If supreme court is joke then you are the biggest joke of your kind.

 

[Asskicker]

and where were u when rajiv gandhi became prime minister after sikh riots??

And who started 2002 riots??

muslims burned sabarmati express burning 59 hindus alive!!! and then they expect no retaliation!!

So what is the resposibility of a CM,watch the muslim buchtered by hindus in turn,then he is a Super cool PM Candidate

 

[AnnoyingOrange]

So what is the resposibility of a CM,watch the muslim buchtered by hindus in turn,then he is a Super cool PM Candidate

No.. his responsibility is to make sure that similar situation never happens under his watch again... and now you tell me ...how many Communal riots have taken place in Gujrast since 2002.?

Educate yourself: Not just Modi: Guide to riots before 2002 and after - Firstpost

 

[he-man]

Nah in this secoolar country muslims have right to kill hindu's and if hindu's responds them we are communal. Prime example is latest violence in UP.



If supreme court is joke then you are the biggest joke of your kind.

No one is gonna justify gujrat riots but in those more than 254 hindus died against 790 odd muslims(official figures) with 223 missing.

And this in a majority hindu population and still u call riots one sided??

shame on u ppl