SarthakGanguly
BANNED
- Joined
- May 10, 2013
- Messages
- 18,416
- Reaction score
- 7
- Country
- Location
Not for that. Gordon said that?What's so funny,he is better than modi
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not for that. Gordon said that?What's so funny,he is better than modi
New Recruit
Brilliant!! What does their ethnicity has to do with Anti nationalism? I feel some of the political leaders in Northern and Western part of this country far more threat to national integrity. Do you think that terming Muslims as invaders and rapists of Hindu women in 21st Century for cheap vote bank policy is not a threat to Indian Unity? For 67 years, politics in North India has been based on religious bigotry and caste politics;be it coming from Samajwadi party, congress or BJP. This has done considerable damage to the inherent fabric of the society, far worse than what Arundhuti Roy or Mamata Bannerjee tries to do.
And I find it ridiculous to argue with someone who questions Amartya Sen's idea of nationalism. Understanding Sen without knowing his family background, without reading his works is beyond the capacity of juvenile members here.So let keep aside him for the moment.
Sir, this was not my point. Distinguishing Banglaeshis among West Bengalis is not that easy as you think. How can you expect Bannerjee to work more when stopping Bangladeshis at border is the duty of the Central Government? How do you expect her to do better when politicians could not separate them from other Indians often deliberately?
This is fundamentally wrong assumption that it is Mamata Bannerjee's alleged association with Jamaat which causes the unstoppable influx of illegal immigrants to this state.As for your comment on stopping illegal Bangladeshis, maybe Mamta Banerjee can start with :
1. stopping association with muslim BDeshi terrorist organizations like Jamaat
I apparently cant post links to support my claims, but once I hit 30 posts I will.
2. stop criticizing BSF when they actually do their jobs of stopping the illegal BDeshis from coming over
the point is simple,there should be a law banning frontier districts bordering pakistan & bangladesh from having any muslims population
Ok. But now Bengal is having around 35 - 40% Muslims. And Assam around 45%. What to do with them?the point is simple,there should be a law banning frontier districts bordering pakistan & bangladesh from having any muslims population.
New Recruit
the point is simple,there should be a law banning frontier districts bordering pakistan & bangladesh from having any muslims population.
Mamata is associated with Jamaat???!!!This is fundamentally wrong assumption that it is Mamata Bannerjee's alleged association with Jamaat which causes the unstoppable influx of illegal immigrants to this state.
So you think BSF has abrogated their duty because somebody else's personal opinion? BSF has its own constitution and certainly they are not bound to tolerate any state interference. So please suggest something better.
And you think this is a logical solution.
New Recruit
This is fundamentally wrong assumption that it is Mamata Bannerjee's alleged association with Jamaat which causes the unstoppable influx of illegal immigrants to this state.
So you think BSF has abrogated their duty because somebody else's personal opinion? BSF has its own constitution and certainly they are not bound to tolerate any state interference. So please suggest something better.
And you think this is a logical solution.
Good idea, that way if any Muslims suddenly pop up, we know that they are illegals and they can immediately be arrested and deported back.
Ok. But now Bengal is having around 35 - 40% Muslims. And Assam around 45%. What to do with them?
This is fundamentally wrong assumption that it is Mamata Bannerjee's alleged association with Jamaat which causes the unstoppable influx of illegal immigrants to this state.
So you think BSF has abrogated their duty because somebody else's personal opinion? BSF has its own constitution and certainly they are not bound to tolerate any state interference. So please suggest something better.
And you think this is a logical solution.
Does not matter even if she was prime minister of India. Her remarks are not Bible.For example she was compelled to eat her own words when she defied EC's instructions that means she can not go against constitution neither BSF has to obey her orders if she had given such.Personal opinion? She is the chief Minister of the state we are trying to stop illegal immigration to.
Mamata is associated with Jamaat???!!!
1.Be specific. what does Bengali educated class has to do with it? What is your proposition?
2. Indian army fighting where?
3.What kind of Puppi jhuppi you saw in Bengal exclusively?
4.One more question.How could a group of Bangladeshis can reach India's North West frontier when their looks,culture and language is quite different and distinguishable from North Indians.How could they pass through Central India if the rest of India is so brilliant in keeping them at bay? (apart from the large scale immigration in Mumbai under your favorite SS party)
Answer with logic.Don't give silly one liners.
Rahul ke to khilaf bohot zyada log Bol rahe hain,ALLAH usko Aur taraqi de
Naheru Family with blood in there hand is fit for All constitutional position but Modi is not fit.
New Recruit
No it is.gujarat is a resource starved region and they lost bombay to maharashtra.
It is modi who has put it in the top league.