JammuWarrior
BANNED
- Joined
- May 18, 2014
- Messages
- 110
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
Ummm Brahmins were not rulers, Rajputs were rulers. Brahmins were a priestly class, just because they were higher on the caste pedestal doesn't mean they held any real power.Use the GHQ section. The Brahman rulers(when the caste system truly existed in full force) are recorded within Indian history itself to have abused their quasi-religious cultural powers. This is the same as the priest class within South America(Ironically, also called Indians by westerners)..many places in Africa.. and was also persistent with many rulers within Mongol and Muslim lands. While glorified there are recorded instances of the Ottoman rulers capturing slave women for their harem's and forcefully converting them(even though some later rose to the rank of wives).
However, this thread talks of the effect of Hindu extremism(which cannot really be reflected by the news posted).. but it is a very real phenomenon and this forum is ample proof that a vermin is rising within India that parallels that of the ISIS... and this vermin will breed more vermin within Indian Muslims(in retaliation) and Indian society will be the ultimate sufferer of this.
Completely wrong, Hindutvadis show little to no parallels with ISIS, please explain how they do?However, this thread talks of the effect of Hindu extremism(which cannot really be reflected by the news posted).. but it is a very real phenomenon and this forum is ample proof that a vermin is rising within India that parallels that of the ISIS... and this vermin will breed more vermin within Indian Muslims(in retaliation) and Indian society will be the ultimate sufferer of this.