What's new

Groups: World War III

it's possible. india is a finance partner basically. it is of no important strategic value unlike central asia and pakistan.

the cementing of ties between the us and india leads to more business done between the us and india to the cost of russia. things change quickly.
 
.
Group A:
■Russia
■China
■North Korea
■Middle East (except for Israel)
■North Africa (except for Libya)
■Southeast Asia
■Eurasia
■Sri Lanka
■Mongolia
■Cuba
■Venezeula
■Pakistan

Group B:
■United States
■India
■Vietnaam
■Taiwan
■Tibet
■Japan
■European Union
■South Korea
■Canada
■Australia & New Zealand
■Central & South America
■South Africa
■Israel

funny thing is... all developed nations except India are put in one category and all other nations trying to struggle one way or another is put in second category...

nice nice - it also sends a different message i guess you already know what i mean
 
.
How dare you omit Mighty Nation of Turkey , and over looking the fact that South America and specially Mexico does not agree with USA
 
.
Indians dreaming of war again? :lol:

It will turn out like last time, nobody will come to save you.

'India cannot match China's military force': Indian Naval Chief - IBNLive

New Delhi: Chief of Naval Staff Admiral Sureesh Mehta has set off a storm by saying India cannot match China military force. Is it a warning from India's military that the government needs to hear?

"In military terms, both conventional and non-conventional, we neither have the capability nor the intention to match China force for force," said Admiral Sureesh Mehta.

For a nuclear-armed military representing the interests of a billion-plus people, the lack of confidence is quite striking. India's military leadership has made a stunning confession that New Delhi doesn't have the stomach for a fight, if push came to shove on the disputed Sino-Indian boundary.

"Whether in terms of GDP, defence spend or any other parameter, the gap between the two is too wide to bridge and is getting wider by the day," he said.

The difference of course being that in 1962, China and India had similar sized economies. Today, China's economy is FOUR times bigger, with commensurate military spending. Like your Naval Chief said, the gap has become too big to ever catch up, and it is widening every day.
 
.
funny thing is... all developed nations except India are put in one category and all other nations trying to struggle one way or another is put in second category...

nice nice - it also sends a different message i guess you already know what i mean

So you think Vietnam, south and central america and south africa are developed nations, but not India ??
 
.
My take
China, N Korea, Venuzuela, Pakistan vs US, India, Vietnam, Japan.

Rest of them may remain nuetral
 
.
My take
China, N Korea, Venuzuela, Pakistan vs US, India, Vietnam, Japan.

Rest of them may remain nuetral

Oops. :lol:

US envoy to Pak justified funds as ‘defence’ against ‘threat from India’ - Indian Express

The USA is still the largest source of external funding to the Pakistani Army, giving billions every year, and military hardware like F-16's. Obviously, jet fighters aren't used for fighting terrorists.

As the US Envoy said, they are for defending against the threat from India. :azn:

China and the US also have the largest bilateral economic relationship in the world, to the point where people have begun describing it as a "G-2". And of course, we both have a mutual interest in arming Pakistan, despite Indian whining about it for decades.
 
.
Oops. :lol:

US envoy to Pak justified funds as ‘defence’ against ‘threat from India’ - Indian Express

The USA is still the largest source of external funding to the Pakistani Army, giving billions every year, and military hardware like F-16's. Obviously, jet fighters aren't used for fighting terrorists.

As the US Envoy said, they are for defending against the threat from India. :azn:

China and the US also have the largest bilateral economic relationship in the world, to the point where people have begun describing it as a "G-2". And of course, we both have a mutual interest in arming Pakistan, despite Indian whining about it for decades.

You have no idea what is going on between Pakistan and US right now. Havent you heard of Haqani network and how US almost
came to the brink of attacking Pakistan ? It helps to update your GK once in a while
 
.
You have no idea what is going on between Pakistan and US right now. Havent you heard of Haqani network and how US almost
came to the brink of attacking Pakistan ? It helps to update your GK once in a while

According to you Indians, the USA has been "on the brink" of attacking Pakistan for years now. :lol:

The world doesn't work according to your wet dreams. Check out the official statements made by Hilary Clinton in the past week.

Hillary Clinton: U.S. cannot abandon Pakistan relationship - Reuters

Oops again. :laugh:
 
.
No more world wars. Even 2 nations will not engage themselves in a conventional war. They simply cant. Economy issued are there. Plus the type of weapons even small armies posses like MRLVs etc will not allow any buildup of infantry.

All over the world we see Proxy wars. Small groups against state army are sometime backed by other countries since this is the most effective way of destabilizing other countries.
 
.
According to you Indians, the USA has been "on the brink" of attacking Pakistan for years now. :lol:

The world doesn't work according to your wet dreams. Check out the official statements made by Hilary Clinton in the past week.

Hillary Clinton: U.S. cannot abandon Pakistan relationship - Reuters

Oops again. :laugh:

And your 'dry dream' is that US will arm Pakistan to attack India, Right ? They continue to bombard Pakistan because they 'like' Pakistan ! And they even side with Pakistan in the event of India Pakistan Conflict !! LOL !!

The same hillary clinton here

US to hold Pakistan accountable on 'range of issues': Clinton

http://www.newstrackindia.com/newsdetails/245531
 
.
And your 'dry dream' is that US will arm Pakistan to attack India, Right ? They continue to bombard Pakistan because they 'like' Pakistan ! And they even side with Pakistan in the event of India Pakistan Conflict !! LOL !!

That is what the US envoy said: US envoy to Pak justified funds as ‘defence’ against ‘threat from India’ - Indian Express

(Unlike you, I actually use "sources" instead of dreams. :azn:)

The US has been funding and arming Pakistan for a long time now, where do you think those F-16's came from? :lol:

Newsflash, the US and Pakistan are currently allies in the War on Terror. Pakistan is considered a major non-NATO ally of the US.
 
.
The same hillary clinton here

US to hold Pakistan accountable on 'range of issues': Clinton

http://www.newstrackindia.com/newsdetails/245531

OK, this "newstrackindia" article, how does it show that the US is "on the brink of attacking Pakistan", as you ridiculously claimed before?

Did you even read the title of the article you posted? :lol: It has nothing to do with the US attacking Pakistan at all.
 
.
I thought, India is a peaceful incredible singing country with non-aligned policy ?

Pointless thread.
 
.
Newsflash, the US and Pakistan are currently allies in the War on Terror. Pakistan is considered a major non-NATO ally of the US.[/QUOTE]

It is not a news flash any more. The world knew it when WOT began long time ago !

What you dont understand is that there is a strong anti US sentiments among Pakistanis and vice versa

Pakistan: America's High-Stakes Frenemy - The Washington Note
 
.
Back
Top Bottom