What's new

Groping Children With Clothes On Is Not Sexual Assault - indian court rules.

. . . . . . . .
1. Judge who ruled that was a WOMAN JUDGE.

Justice Pushpa Ganediwala,

Pushpa-V-Ganediwala-1.jpg


2. Judgement has been overturned by the Supreme Court in 1 day.
 
. . .
The fact that a judge made these judgement speaks volumes

Nope, charge was of "sexual assault" which is LEGALLY defined as "penetration".

This was "sexual harassment" Which when the victim is a women is punishable by minimum of 1 year imprisonment.

If victim is minor, the case is under POSCO Act and the minimum punishment is 3 years in Jail.

The charge was wrongly framed.
 
.
Nope, charge was of "sexual assault" which is LEGALLY defined as "penetration".

This was "sexual harassment" Which when the victim is a women is punishable by minimum of 1 year imprisonment.

If victim is minor, the case is under POSCO Act and the minimum punishment is 3 years in Jail.

The charge was wrongly framed.

Too little too late. Headlines already made in international newspapers. This is typical Modi behavior. First test the waters and see how everyone reacts. When going gets tough reverse original decision. We have seen it before. Too little too late though.
 
.
Posts of No-value/off-topic
...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Nope, charge was of "sexual assault" which is LEGALLY defined as "penetration".

This was "sexual harassment" Which when the victim is a women is punishable by minimum of 1 year imprisonment.

If victim is minor, the case is under POSCO Act and the minimum punishment is 3 years in Jail.

The charge was wrongly framed.
I hope it happens to some in your family...like you child...then let's see if you will say nope there was no penetration but he touched everywhere so it ok. You indian..thew(spit)
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom