What's new

Gripen E : Beyond Hype , “Reality is much stormier, much murkier, much scarier”

PARIKRAMA

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 5, 2014
Messages
4,871
Reaction score
185
Country
India
Location
India
Gripen E : Beyond Hype , “Reality is much stormier, much murkier, much scarier”
Published July 15, 2016

SOURCE: Vinayak Shetti / FOR MY TAKE / Editor of Indiandefencenews.in

573c9a9735708ea2d59debe1.jpg


On May this year Saab rolled out first pre-production Gripen E aircraft at its facility in Linkoping Sweden which was attended by many high profile Swedish VVIPs along with Airforce Chief of Brazilian Air Force . In attendance was the presence of a high number of Aviation/Defence Journalist from around the world who were flown in specially to cover the event, which also saw sizable Indian media contingent specially flown in by SAAB.

Development of Gripen E is no doubt a major enhancement in capabilities and a thorough overhaul of every element of the basic Gripen design but Hype which SAAB has unleashed in India by unprecedented Sponsored media coverage of it latest Gripen E offering to India as part of the ‘Make in India’ initiative is much stormier, much murkier, much scarier which needs to be exposed to carry out fine assessment of latest SAAB’s offer to India .

Saab Gripen NG Forever in making !

Gripen E begin has a low-cost internal SAAB program nearly decade ago when SAAB rolled out modified Gripen D dubbed has Gripen NG ( Next Generation ) which incorporated many of the proposed Gripen E changes from a new engine, redesigned landing gear and new cockpit layout, which first flew in 2008 and logged some 300 flights .

MMRCA Failure

SAAB offered India initially it’s older sibling Gripen C/D but withdraw its offer after competition saw new entries and offered Technology Demonstrator aircraft dubbed Gripen NG .

Gripen NG was demonstrated in India during MMRCA trials performed well and proved in its highly claimed Net-Centric warfare capabilities and successfully demonstrated advanced data communications,dual data links , satellite communication and video links but failed to impress with other parameters and exposed its operational deficiency in technical evaluation round which was noted and not even contested by SAAB.

Backdoor Entry attempts

After Rejection of Gripen from MMRCA Tender , SAAB tried to make a backdoor entry where it again offered its Gripen fighter jets to India independently and parallel to MMRCA deal to replace India’s ageing Mig21 fleet but acceptance of that proposal could have obviously meant killing our indigenous LCA-Tejas program hence rejected again.

SAAB offered to establish a Joint venture company with DRDO, where Swedish company could have been holding the majority of share in the new company to help India develop LCA-Tejas Mark-2 in lieu of orders for its Gripen Fighter jets , which too was rejected .

Reading Fine Timeline of Gripen E Development

First, Gripen E Prototype rolled out in May this year will see its first flight only by the end of this year. while Swedish government has agreed to finance development of 3 Gripen E Prototypes, Second Prototype will be rolled out by next year with many key system pieces of equipment and third and final Prototype with all planned bells and whistles will take to air only in 2019 .

According to SAAB’s own assessment, Gripen E will require nearly 1200 sorties to conclude its development and Initial operational clearance (IOC) for Gripen E will come only in 2021 that’s when program will actually gain speed when the final and third Prototype Gripen E takes to air in 2019 with all planned upgraded equipment and Final operational clearance will be achieved only in 2023 which is nearly 7 years after its first rollout of Gripen E Prototype.


3-5 years Timeline for Indian orders

Jan Widerström who is SAAB India head and chairman confirmed in an Interview that from the date of the contract, SAAB will be able to deliver the first aircraft from the Indian soil only in 3 to 5 years , even if we assume that we have a contract by year end and the first aircraft is delivered by early 2020 which is 3 years from now then India will be clearly getting Pre-IOC certified aircraft since IOC is only planned for Gripen E only in 2021 and Swedish and Brazilian air force will be taking deliveries of IOC-certified Gripen E only by end of 2021 , so India will have to wait for nearly 5 years to get its hands only on IOC-certified aircraft .

Conclusion

DRDO plans to rollout IOC-certified LCA-Tejas Mark-2 by 2021-22 and plans to achieve it FOC in next three to four years if you compare IOC and FOC of both aircraft, India will better off in concentrating in the development of its own indigenous LCA-Tejas .

if Indian Air force which repeatedly refused to accept and allow mass production of IOC-II certified LCA-Tejas MK-1 aircraft in past will have a difficult time explaining why it will be open to acquiring Gripen-E with limited capabilities when it has curtailed orders for Tejas MK-1 which will achieve its FOC by March 2017 and upgraded Tejas MK-1A could have already entered production by the time Swedes could have rolled out first Gripen-E for India.

http://idrw.org/gripen-e-beyond-hype-reality-much-stormier-much-murkier-much-scarier/


+++
Comments
Pls refer my earlier post here

upload_2016-7-15_15-15-54.png

https://defence.pk/threads/dassault...ussions-thread-2.351407/page-270#post-8447719
  • 5 years for IOC certified version
  • 7 years for FOC certified version
  • This article kind of supports what i had said before with the post
  • Its now clear how SAAB is running just a PR campaign and the deal structure as well as the aircraft itself will not be available 7 years from signing as well
  • Its good DM MP is clear he wants aircraft production by 4th year onwards and is looking at substantial technology to be shared and funded with codes.
  • This will help all folks understand how we require a much better deal and why DM MP is a tough negotiator
  • If Rafale deal is "costly" as per folks and if its offset involves everything right from radar, engine, spectra, stealth, MDBA missile help (seeker), LCA , AMCA help, SSN, AIP help, and much more.. then it makes sense that other competing MII partners for separate line also provide us with similar tech and at cheaper price.
  • At $85 Mn flyaway +weapons $25 Mn (non common to IAF pool) + similar package (support, training, maintainence, everything) price pushing everything to around $220 Mn +/-10% is a hefty price to pay for a pre FOC single engined jet who is competing to be LCA competitor.
  • I am expecting a similar article revealing the truth for F16 deal from LM soon..As well as all the carrots dangled to us

@Abingdonboy @anant_s @Taygibay @Picdelamirand-oil @Vergennes @randomradio @MilSpec @Koovie @Echo_419 @Dash @hellfire @ito @SR-91 @AMCA @DesiGuy1403 @ranjeet @hellfire @fsayed @SpArK @AUSTERLITZ @nair @proud_indian @Roybot @jbgt90 @Sergi @Water Car Engineer @dadeechi @kurup @Rain Man @kaykay @Joe Shearer @Tshering22 @Dandpatta @danger007 @Didact @Soumitra @SrNair
@TejasMk3@jbgt90 @ranjeet @4GTejasBVR @The_Showstopper @guest11 @egodoc222 @Nilgiri @SarthakGanguly @Omega007 @GURU DUTT @HariPrasad @JanjaWeed @litefire @AMCA @Perpendicular @Spectre@litefire @AMCA @Perpendicular@Ryuzaki @CorporateAffairs @GR!FF!N @migflug @Levina

@SvenSvensonov : Tagging you too.. The circus is pretty lively..but then i am sure you can enjoy the joker acts (either us or the jet makers)
 
Last edited:
.
The cynical side of me is convinced that the top brass of our armed forces are NOT that saintly.
Nothing else explains the way the indigenously developed equipment is deliberately sabotaged by various means so that chance is given to foreign vendors to sell their merchandise.

This is making me very very sad!!
 
.
Gripen E : Beyond Hype , “Reality is much stormier, much murkier, much scarier”
Published July 15, 2016

SOURCE: Vinayak Shetti / FOR MY TAKE / Editor of Indiandefencenews.in

573c9a9735708ea2d59debe1.jpg


On May this year Saab rolled out first pre-production Gripen E aircraft at its facility in Linkoping Sweden which was attended by many high profile Swedish VVIPs along with Airforce Chief of Brazilian Air Force . In attendance was the presence of a high number of Aviation/Defence Journalist from around the world who were flown in specially to cover the event, which also saw sizable Indian media contingent specially flown in by SAAB.

Development of Gripen E is no doubt a major enhancement in capabilities and a thorough overhaul of every element of the basic Gripen design but Hype which SAAB has unleashed in India by unprecedented Sponsored media coverage of it latest Gripen E offering to India as part of the ‘Make in India’ initiative is much stormier, much murkier, much scarier which needs to be exposed to carry out fine assessment of latest SAAB’s offer to India .

Saab Gripen NG Forever in making !

Gripen E begin has a low-cost internal SAAB program nearly decade ago when SAAB rolled out modified Gripen D dubbed has Gripen NG ( Next Generation ) which incorporated many of the proposed Gripen E changes from a new engine, redesigned landing gear and new cockpit layout, which first flew in 2008 and logged some 300 flights .

MMRCA Failure

SAAB offered India initially it’s older sibling Gripen C/D but withdraw its offer after competition saw new entries and offered Technology Demonstrator aircraft dubbed Gripen NG .

Gripen NG was demonstrated in India during MMRCA trials performed well and proved in its highly claimed Net-Centric warfare capabilities and successfully demonstrated advanced data communications,dual data links , satellite communication and video links but failed to impress with other parameters and exposed its operational deficiency in technical evaluation round which was noted and not even contested by SAAB.

Backdoor Entry attempts

After Rejection of Gripen from MMRCA Tender , SAAB tried to make a backdoor entry where it again offered its Gripen fighter jets to India independently and parallel to MMRCA deal to replace India’s ageing Mig21 fleet but acceptance of that proposal could have obviously meant killing our indigenous LCA-Tejas program hence rejected again.

SAAB offered to establish a Joint venture company with DRDO, where Swedish company could have been holding the majority of share in the new company to help India develop LCA-Tejas Mark-2 in lieu of orders for its Gripen Fighter jets , which too was rejected .

Reading Fine Timeline of Gripen E Development

First, Gripen E Prototype rolled out in May this year will see its first flight only by the end of this year. while Swedish government has agreed to finance development of 3 Gripen E Prototypes, Second Prototype will be rolled out by next year with many key system pieces of equipment and third and final Prototype with all planned bells and whistles will take to air only in 2019 .

According to SAAB’s own assessment, Gripen E will require nearly 1200 sorties to conclude its development and Initial operational clearance (IOC) for Gripen E will come only in 2021 that’s when program will actually gain speed when the final and third Prototype Gripen E takes to air in 2019 with all planned upgraded equipment and Final operational clearance will be achieved only in 2023 which is nearly 7 years after its first rollout of Gripen E Prototype.


3-5 years Timeline for Indian orders

Jan Widerström who is SAAB India head and chairman confirmed in an Interview that from the date of the contract, SAAB will be able to deliver the first aircraft from the Indian soil only in 3 to 5 years , even if we assume that we have a contract by year end and the first aircraft is delivered by early 2020 which is 3 years from now then India will be clearly getting Pre-IOC certified aircraft since IOC is only planned for Gripen E only in 2021 and Swedish and Brazilian air force will be taking deliveries of IOC-certified Gripen E only by end of 2021 , so India will have to wait for nearly 5 years to get its hands only on IOC-certified aircraft .

Conclusion

DRDO plans to rollout IOC-certified LCA-Tejas Mark-2 by 2021-22 and plans to achieve it FOC in next three to four years if you compare IOC and FOC of both aircraft, India will better off in concentrating in the development of its own indigenous LCA-Tejas .

if Indian Air force which repeatedly refused to accept and allow mass production of IOC-II certified LCA-Tejas MK-1 aircraft in past will have a difficult time explaining why it will be open to acquiring Gripen-E with limited capabilities when it has curtailed orders for Tejas MK-1 which will achieve its FOC by March 2017 and upgraded Tejas MK-1A could have already entered production by the time Swedes could have rolled out first Gripen-E for India.

http://idrw.org/gripen-e-beyond-hype-reality-much-stormier-much-murkier-much-scarier/


+++
Comments
Pls refer my earlier post here

View attachment 317956
https://defence.pk/threads/dassault...ussions-thread-2.351407/page-270#post-8447719
  • 5 years for IOC certified version
  • 7 years for FOC certified version
  • This article kind of supports what i had said before with the post
  • Its now clear how SAAB is running just a PR campaign and the deal structure as well as the aircraft itself will not be available 7 years from signing as well
  • Its good DM MP is clear he wants aircraft production by 4th year onwards and is looking at substantial technology to be shared and funded with codes.
  • This will help all folks understand how we require a much better deal and why DM MP is a tough negotiator
  • If Rafale deal is "costly" as per folks and if its offset involves everything right from radar, engine, spectra, stealth, MDBA missile help (seeker), LCA , AMCA help, SSN, AIP help, and much more.. then it makes sense that other competing MII partners for separate line also provide us with similar tech and at cheaper price.
  • At $85 Mn flyaway +weapons $25 Mn (non common to IAF pool) + similar package (support, training, maintainence, everything) price pushing everything to around $220 Mn +/-10% is a hefty price to pay for a pre FOC single engined jet who is competing to be LCA competitor.
  • I am expecting a similar article revealing the truth for F16 deal from LM soon..As well as all the carrots dangled to us

@Abingdonboy @anant_s @Taygibay @Picdelamirand-oil @Vergennes @randomradio @MilSpec @Koovie @Echo_419 @Dash @hellfire @ito @SR-91 @AMCA @DesiGuy1403 @ranjeet @hellfire @fsayed @SpArK @AUSTERLITZ @nair @proud_indian @Roybot @jbgt90 @Sergi @Water Car Engineer @dadeechi @kurup @Rain Man @kaykay @Joe Shearer @Tshering22 @Dandpatta @danger007 @Didact @Soumitra @SrNair
@TejasMk3@jbgt90 @ranjeet @4GTejasBVR @The_Showstopper @guest11 @egodoc222 @Nilgiri @SarthakGanguly @Omega007 @GURU DUTT @HariPrasad @JanjaWeed @litefire @AMCA @Perpendicular @Spectre@litefire @AMCA @Perpendicular@Ryuzaki @CorporateAffairs @GR!FF!N @migflug @Levina

@SvenSvensonov : Tagging you too.. The circus is pretty lively..but then i am sure you can enjoy the joker acts (either us or the jet makers)

IF we have to buy a Single engine plane from Abroad then
F 16 Block 70 is the Best option

Why Gripen
 
.
IF we have to buy a Single engine plane from Abroad then
F 16 Block 70 is the Best option

Why Gripen
No single engine importing is correct. Bcz of immediate jet numbers need, we are looking for a second MII line. The result is this circus...

Better we should invest and upgrade HAL facilities as well as develop the MIC ecosystem for a pvt player to be assembler for a second LCA line.

If we can get LCA line production from 16 to 24 to 40 per year kind of a number, i dont see any need of Gripen E or F16s

In fact if we can get Kaveri engine done in proper manner, that will raise indigenous % in LCA program also much higher.

BTW @Ankit Kumar was always talking and pointing the IOC /FOC issues of Gripen E and how IAF will select such a plane which is not certified thereby stating the timeline for Gripen E induction would be pretty late
 
.
Gripen E : Beyond Hype , “Reality is much stormier, much murkier, much scarier”
Published July 15, 2016

SOURCE: Vinayak Shetti / FOR MY TAKE / Editor of Indiandefencenews.in

573c9a9735708ea2d59debe1.jpg


On May this year Saab rolled out first pre-production Gripen E aircraft at its facility in Linkoping Sweden which was attended by many high profile Swedish VVIPs along with Airforce Chief of Brazilian Air Force . In attendance was the presence of a high number of Aviation/Defence Journalist from around the world who were flown in specially to cover the event, which also saw sizable Indian media contingent specially flown in by SAAB.

Development of Gripen E is no doubt a major enhancement in capabilities and a thorough overhaul of every element of the basic Gripen design but Hype which SAAB has unleashed in India by unprecedented Sponsored media coverage of it latest Gripen E offering to India as part of the ‘Make in India’ initiative is much stormier, much murkier, much scarier which needs to be exposed to carry out fine assessment of latest SAAB’s offer to India .

Saab Gripen NG Forever in making !

Gripen E begin has a low-cost internal SAAB program nearly decade ago when SAAB rolled out modified Gripen D dubbed has Gripen NG ( Next Generation ) which incorporated many of the proposed Gripen E changes from a new engine, redesigned landing gear and new cockpit layout, which first flew in 2008 and logged some 300 flights .

MMRCA Failure

SAAB offered India initially it’s older sibling Gripen C/D but withdraw its offer after competition saw new entries and offered Technology Demonstrator aircraft dubbed Gripen NG .

Gripen NG was demonstrated in India during MMRCA trials performed well and proved in its highly claimed Net-Centric warfare capabilities and successfully demonstrated advanced data communications,dual data links , satellite communication and video links but failed to impress with other parameters and exposed its operational deficiency in technical evaluation round which was noted and not even contested by SAAB.

Backdoor Entry attempts

After Rejection of Gripen from MMRCA Tender , SAAB tried to make a backdoor entry where it again offered its Gripen fighter jets to India independently and parallel to MMRCA deal to replace India’s ageing Mig21 fleet but acceptance of that proposal could have obviously meant killing our indigenous LCA-Tejas program hence rejected again.

SAAB offered to establish a Joint venture company with DRDO, where Swedish company could have been holding the majority of share in the new company to help India develop LCA-Tejas Mark-2 in lieu of orders for its Gripen Fighter jets , which too was rejected .

Reading Fine Timeline of Gripen E Development

First, Gripen E Prototype rolled out in May this year will see its first flight only by the end of this year. while Swedish government has agreed to finance development of 3 Gripen E Prototypes, Second Prototype will be rolled out by next year with many key system pieces of equipment and third and final Prototype with all planned bells and whistles will take to air only in 2019 .

According to SAAB’s own assessment, Gripen E will require nearly 1200 sorties to conclude its development and Initial operational clearance (IOC) for Gripen E will come only in 2021 that’s when program will actually gain speed when the final and third Prototype Gripen E takes to air in 2019 with all planned upgraded equipment and Final operational clearance will be achieved only in 2023 which is nearly 7 years after its first rollout of Gripen E Prototype.


3-5 years Timeline for Indian orders

Jan Widerström who is SAAB India head and chairman confirmed in an Interview that from the date of the contract, SAAB will be able to deliver the first aircraft from the Indian soil only in 3 to 5 years , even if we assume that we have a contract by year end and the first aircraft is delivered by early 2020 which is 3 years from now then India will be clearly getting Pre-IOC certified aircraft since IOC is only planned for Gripen E only in 2021 and Swedish and Brazilian air force will be taking deliveries of IOC-certified Gripen E only by end of 2021 , so India will have to wait for nearly 5 years to get its hands only on IOC-certified aircraft .

Conclusion

DRDO plans to rollout IOC-certified LCA-Tejas Mark-2 by 2021-22 and plans to achieve it FOC in next three to four years if you compare IOC and FOC of both aircraft, India will better off in concentrating in the development of its own indigenous LCA-Tejas .

if Indian Air force which repeatedly refused to accept and allow mass production of IOC-II certified LCA-Tejas MK-1 aircraft in past will have a difficult time explaining why it will be open to acquiring Gripen-E with limited capabilities when it has curtailed orders for Tejas MK-1 which will achieve its FOC by March 2017 and upgraded Tejas MK-1A could have already entered production by the time Swedes could have rolled out first Gripen-E for India.

http://idrw.org/gripen-e-beyond-hype-reality-much-stormier-much-murkier-much-scarier/


+++
Comments
Pls refer my earlier post here

View attachment 317956
https://defence.pk/threads/dassault...ussions-thread-2.351407/page-270#post-8447719
  • 5 years for IOC certified version
  • 7 years for FOC certified version
  • This article kind of supports what i had said before with the post
  • Its now clear how SAAB is running just a PR campaign and the deal structure as well as the aircraft itself will not be available 7 years from signing as well
  • Its good DM MP is clear he wants aircraft production by 4th year onwards and is looking at substantial technology to be shared and funded with codes.
  • This will help all folks understand how we require a much better deal and why DM MP is a tough negotiator
  • If Rafale deal is "costly" as per folks and if its offset involves everything right from radar, engine, spectra, stealth, MDBA missile help (seeker), LCA , AMCA help, SSN, AIP help, and much more.. then it makes sense that other competing MII partners for separate line also provide us with similar tech and at cheaper price.
  • At $85 Mn flyaway +weapons $25 Mn (non common to IAF pool) + similar package (support, training, maintainence, everything) price pushing everything to around $220 Mn +/-10% is a hefty price to pay for a pre FOC single engined jet who is competing to be LCA competitor.
  • I am expecting a similar article revealing the truth for F16 deal from LM soon..As well as all the carrots dangled to us

@Abingdonboy @anant_s @Taygibay @Picdelamirand-oil @Vergennes @randomradio @MilSpec @Koovie @Echo_419 @Dash @hellfire @ito @SR-91 @AMCA @DesiGuy1403 @ranjeet @hellfire @fsayed @SpArK @AUSTERLITZ @nair @proud_indian @Roybot @jbgt90 @Sergi @Water Car Engineer @dadeechi @kurup @Rain Man @kaykay @Joe Shearer @Tshering22 @Dandpatta @danger007 @Didact @Soumitra @SrNair
@TejasMk3@jbgt90 @ranjeet @4GTejasBVR @The_Showstopper @guest11 @egodoc222 @Nilgiri @SarthakGanguly @Omega007 @GURU DUTT @HariPrasad @JanjaWeed @litefire @AMCA @Perpendicular @Spectre@litefire @AMCA @Perpendicular@Ryuzaki @CorporateAffairs @GR!FF!N @migflug @Levina

@SvenSvensonov : Tagging you too.. The circus is pretty lively..but then i am sure you can enjoy the joker acts (either us or the jet makers)

Saab is desperate like a w*****e now. If this offer had come 15 20 yrs back then it would have made more sense
 
.
No single engine importing is correct. Bcz of immediate jet numbers need, we are looking for a second MII line. The result is this circus...

Better we should invest and upgrade HAL facilities as well as develop the MIC ecosystem for a pvt player to be assembler for a second LCA line.

If we can get LCA line production from 16 to 24 to 40 per year kind of a number, i dont see any need of Gripen E or F16s

In fact if we can get Kaveri engine done in proper manner, that will raise indigenous % in LCA program also much higher.

BTW is there any good news about Rafale

I really believe Americans will get something either F 16 or F 18

Now we are too far into this partnership

Obviously we will demand all source codes and a sanctions proof arrangement

That is a given ; it looks like rather than Rafale MII ; US driven MII will happen
 
. .
If we indeed are going for Foreign Single engine plane then F-16 (and F-35 later ) makes sense. At least its a mature plane,will be cheaper and our pilots are familiar with this plane.
 
.
F18 is the only option left with future MLU as per new programme
http://nationalinterest.org/blog/th...-18-super-hornets-some-serious-upgrades-16947

US Navy Wants More F/A-18 Super Hornets (And with Some Serious Upgrades)


Even USA NAVY wants more of them

@nair @proud_indian @Roybot @jbgt90 @Sergi @Water Car Engineer @dadeechi @kurup @Rain Man @kaykay @Abingdonboy @SR-91 @nang2 @anant_s @Joe Shearer @Tshering22 @Dandpatta @danger007 @Didact @Soumitra @SrNair
@TejasMk3
@jbgt90 @ranjeet @4GTejasBVR @The_Showstopper @guest11 @PARIKRAMA @egodoc222 @DesiGuy1403 @Nilgiri @SarthakGanguly @Omega007 @GURU DUTT @HariPrasad @JanjaWeed @litefire @AMCA @Perpendicular @MilSpec @Spectre @Windjammer @Horus
@Ryuzaki @CorporateAffairs
@GR!FF!N @migflug @Levina @randomradio @Guynextdoor2 @2800 @calmDown@all

Parikar must announce tender for another Tejas manufacturing line for Pvt industries from reliance,tata,mahindra so that these companies would start churning out Tejas by 2019 and total Tejas production rate combined HAL+ PVT PLAYER would 40 per year by 2020
 
.
@PARIKRAMA

a lot has been heard in last few months and if DM strategy was to squeeze maximum out of Dassault by portraying that India has options beyond Rafale, i think he succeeded.
But now it is time to put this proverbial circus to an end and concentrate on Rafale and see how it can be incorporated with MII. Killing LCA 2 (or even entertaining thoughts) will be stupid really considering the amount of work that has gone into LCA program.
now with MTCR signed and India having an access to a whole new gamut of technologies, it is improtant that we don't go on window shopping (like Saudi Arabia does) for armament and try to leverage this new scenario to develop our own domestic capabilities not just in manufacturing but also design.
Hope better sense prevails.

+++
@SvenSvensonov is right when he says that US is actually pulling strings to essentially serve its own foreign policy in IOR (however one interprets it). Someday when relations might not be as cordial as they seem today, things might take a bad turn and then what happens.
i do remember a very important lesson from past. In 60s India had to import huge quantities of grains from abroad (US included) and that meant dependance on benevolence of others. One day Dr. Swaminathan and his team decided to move differently and initiated what we know today as Green revolution. You know rest of story.
Point is, given a choice, baby steps on your own are any day better than piggybacking on someone else.
 
Last edited:
.
@PARIKRAMA

a lot has been heard in last few months and if DM strategy was to squeeze maximum out of Dassault by portraying that India has options beyond Rafale, i think he succeeded.
But now it is time to put this proverbial circus to an end and concentrate on Rafale and see how it can be incorporated with MII. Killing LCA 2 (or even entertaining thoughts) will be stupid really considering the amount of work that has gone into LCA program.
now with MTCR signed and India having an access to a whole new gamut of technologies, it is improtant that we don't go on window shopping (like Saudi Arabia does) for armament and try to leverage this new scenario to develop our own domestic capabilities not just in manufacturing but also design.
Hope better sense prevails.
Great words brother..
Thats what is now needed.. Its a bit high time we bring this circus to close..
  • Rafale deal and MII for twin engine
  • Use offsets and get technology + Kavery engine + Kaveri engine evolution
  • LCA pvt sector line and ramping up numbers
  • Indigenous LCA Mk2/LSA Ghost go ahead with a fixed timeline

With MTCR - gets armed drones and better technology but be selective.. We should stop window shopping.

In the words of @SvenSvensonov there is a considerable gap between what is being offerred by most and what we are expecting. So we need to be a bit more realistic and slowly try more of home grown technology.

I say why not introduce a separate R&D investment of mandatorily 2% in companies act+ income tax acts and allow that investment to be removed from PBIT (profit before income and tax) like say tax exemption or like depreciation kind of benefit. Club it with 1% corporate social responsibility and make every corporate small or big invest 3% of their income earned at PBIT level on CSR and R&D
 
.
3-5 years Timeline for Indian orders

Jan Widerström who is SAAB India head and chairman confirmed in an Interview that from the date of the contract, SAAB will be able to deliver the first aircraft from the Indian soil only in 3 to 5 years , even if we assume that we have a contract by year end and the first aircraft is delivered by early 2020 which is 3 years from now then India will be clearly getting Pre-IOC certified aircraft since IOC is only planned for Gripen E only in 2021 and Swedish and Brazilian air force will be taking deliveries of IOC-certified Gripen E only by end of 2021 , so India will have to wait for nearly 5 years to get its hands only on IOC-certified aircraft .


This is such a stupid assessment. Parrikar will take a year to choose the jet, so that's only in 2017. After that comes contract negotiations and that will take a year.

When Saab says 3-5 years, they mean after 2018, which is a reasonable time frame for the contract to be signed. 3 to 5 years from then is 2021-2023, which matches their IOC-FOC projections.


IF we have to buy a Single engine plane from Abroad then
F 16 Block 70 is the Best option

Why Gripen

Gripen is way way way better than even a Block 80. People always forget sensor fusion, pretty much the most important parameter now.

If a single engine jet is to be imported, it has to be the Gripen, no question about it. If it is homemade, then there are two options, LSA and LCA.

Parikar must announce tender for another Tejas manufacturing line for Pvt industries from reliance,tata,mahindra so that these companies would start churning out Tejas by 2019 and total Tejas production rate combined HAL+ PVT PLAYER would 40 per year by 2020

The private players are incapable of building a jet on their own. Even for something as simple as an IFV, they want foreign partners.
 
.
R&D investment of mandatorily 2% in companies act+ income tax acts and allow that investment to be removed from PBIT (profit before income and tax) like say tax exemption or like depreciation kind of benefit. Club it with 1% corporate social responsibility and make every corporate small or big invest 3% of their income earned at PBIT level on CSR and R&D
but wouldn't it increase the amt. of exceed tax levied on new business along with medium bussinesss multifold causing excess of tax burden indirectly on the middle income society and its will further more create gap b/w rich and middle income group............:cray::cray::cray:
 
.
Although Gripen is a good plane and in many aspects better than F 16 Bk 52s especially on net centric warfare, buying Gripen will yield very little strategic benefits. Moreover, it will kill Tejas, however, a joint venture between SAAB and HAL for improving Tejas is good idea. Unlike other companies, SAAB would hesitate little in ToT.
 
.
i do remember a very important lesson from past. In 60s India had to import huge quantities of grains from abroad (US included) and that meant dependance on benevolence of others. One day Dr. Swaminathan and his team decided to move differently and initiated what we know today as Green revolution

1) Green revolution itself was a reaction to the West holding up the grain shipments to India after the 1965 war.

2) India (Indira) tried to appease the West by devaluing the currency and liberalize the economy but it did not work

3) India (Indira) finally gave up the policy of liberalization and moved India towards socialism and transformed India from a grain importing country to self-sufficiency in grain production within a span of 8 years. This act single handedly gave India strength to withstand all types of sanctions & pressures with Food security firmly in its pocket. This act single handedly enabled India go nuclear in 1974

PVN being a confidant of Indira used the same policy to get a good foot hold on economy to enable India go nuclear for the second time in 1998.

Liberalization has always been is a temporary policy to achieve specific objectives in the short run while self-sufficiency was always the real goal.

The day India forgets this truth, that would be the start of its decline.
 
Last edited:
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom