What's new

Govt's university fee changes mean humanities students will pay the entire cost of their degree

Soumitra

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jan 11, 2011
Messages
8,415
Reaction score
-17
Country
India
Location
India
Government's university fee changes mean humanities students will pay the entire cost of their degrees

Key points:
  • Education Minister Dan Tehan says the Government want to steer people away from humanities into "job-ready" STEM fields
  • For someone studying humanities, the cost of their contribution to the degree is now almost exactly equal to the cost of teaching the degree
  • Experts says the system should not penalise students who wish to study arts and leave them with a disproportionate debt level

If you want to study arts and humanities, you will simply have to pay for it yourself.

Experts say this is essentially the effect of the Federal Government's proposed overhaul of tertiary education.

The plan more than doubles the cost of studying most humanities subjects at university, but slashes the cost to students of what the Government deems to be "job-relevant" courses.

It means someone studying humanities or communications will be in the same fee bracket as law students.

An arts student's contribution to the cost of their degree is now higher than someone doing medicine.

For someone doing humanities, the cost of their contribution to their degree is now almost exactly equal to the cost of teaching the degree.

'Some students will pay more than their degree costs'
The national president of the National Tertiary Education Union (NTEU), Alison Barnes, said the measures could well steer students away from humanities because of the higher cost.

She noted that at $14,500, it would cost the student as much to obtain their humanities degree as it does to teach it.

"It appears that the Government has set the student contribution to equal the exact average cost of teaching these programs," Dr Barnes said.

12374886-4x3-large.jpg

Alison Barnes said the measures could well steer students away from humanities because of the higher cost.
"The Government will likely make a nominal contribution to the universities for each student studying in this band, however, the actual costs will likely be covered by these new fees, and will vary by institution.

So some students will pay more than their degree costs.


In some cases, this means that the Government will no longer be contributing any money directly towards these programs for a public student enrolled in a public university."

The Federal Government last year commissioned a report by Deloitte that looked into the actual costs of teaching programs.

The Grattan Institute's higher education program director Andrew Norton has done analysis of the fee changes based on that report.

His analysis found that the current government contribution for a humanities degree was $6,226, while the student contribution in humanities was $6,804.

Under the Government's proposed change, the public contribution for humanities falls by $5,126, while the student contribution increases by $7,696.

Minister says straight arts degree 'nearly cost me a job'
Education Minister Dan Tehan told the National Press Club on Friday that the Government was unashamedly trying to steer students away from humanities.

This is despite himself having obtained an arts degree.


Asked by a journalist during the press club event whether the Government was "trying to send a price signal" so students think twice about what they study, Mr Tehan answered, "There already was a price signal there, but, yes."

"What we're trying to do is encourage … students to go in those areas where we know the skills will be," Mr Tehan said.

"We know we need more teachers; we know we will need more nurses; we will need more people in allied health; we know we need more engineers; we know we need more psychologists."

Mr Tehan said up until now, engineers and scientists had been subsidising arts graduates.

Now arts graduates would need to start "thinking about the employment outcomes that they are going to get from their degree", he said.

"When I did my arts degree, looking back, I wish that I had done a language," Mr Tehan said.

"It nearly cost me the opportunity of getting a job."

Fee system 'should be neutral'
Mr Norton said, while the Government's aim was to move young Australians towards "job-ready" degrees, it could not control market demand in the post-COVID-19 environment.

"My view is if you want to steer student behaviour, let them know where the jobs are going to be, backed up by marketing," he said.

Students should have the choice to study whatever they wish, and not be penalised down the track when they have to repay the debt, he said.

"It [the system] should be neutral in terms of what students choose to study," Mr Norton said.

"The system should be designed so students take a similar number of years to repay their HELP debt regardless of which course they've chosen to do.

"Under this [new] system, humanities students may spend their entire careers repaying debt, whereas for a nursing student it may take just a few years — there are very big discrepancies."

The NTEU's Dr Barnes said humanities, commerce and law teach critical and analytical thinking.

"Being able to assess and solve thorny problems will be even more important in the coming decades than it is today," she said.

"But the real point here is that Dan Tehan is asking a small group of students to bail out higher education more broadly.

"That is unfair and unconscionable."

Ai Group chief executive Innes Willox said he was pleased there were now incentives to undertake courses in STEM subjects, but called for "a further increase in funding so that the reduced fees are not at the expense of increased fees in the humanities disciplines".

"A large financial burden is being shifted to these future workers who will fill important professional roles required by industry," Mr Willox said.

He noted Thursday's labour force figures showed the unemployment rate for those aged 15-24 was 16.1 per cent — the highest since 1997.

"Young people have been disproportionately impacted by the social, economic and health consequences arising from the global [COVD-19] pandemic," Mr Willox said.

"And experience from previous economic downturns tells us that it takes at least twice as long for youth employment levels to recover."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-06...s-government-fees-tertiary-education/12374124
 
. .
@Shantanu_Left @jamahir This is what I want the Indian Goverment to also do.Make humanities degrees expensive and this will steer more students towards STEM while at the same time reducing the JNU Jamia type nonsense. This is killing 2 birds with one stone.

This is unfortunate; I think the whole world should move towards free education based on merit rather than incentivising and commodifying knowledge like so.
I am sorry. Humanities degrees have no job prospects and no large benefits to the society. How many History, Geography teachers you want? What about rest of the students? They get jobs like being servers at McDonalds.

Mind you, I am not saying that the job is not important. I am just saying that do you need a 3 or 4 year degree subsidized by tax payers to be able to ask "Do you want fries with your burger?"

Even the education minister- an arts graduate is saying

Mr Tehan said up until now, engineers and scientists had been subsidising arts graduates.

Now arts graduates would need to start "thinking about the employment outcomes that they are going to get from their degree", he said.

"When I did my arts degree, looking back, I wish that I had done a language," Mr Tehan said.

"It nearly cost me the opportunity of getting a job."
 
.
Alarm Over Huge Cuts to Humanities and Social Sciences at Japanese Universities
gettyimages-558230123.jpg

A view of the University of Tokyo

JTB Photo—UIG/Getty Images
BY NASH JENKINS

SEPTEMBER 16, 2015 1:53 AM EDT
More than two dozen Japanese universities have announced that they will reduce or altogether eliminate their academic programs in the humanities and social sciences, following a dictum from Tokyo to focus on disciplines that “better meet society’s needs.”

Times Higher Education reports that of the 60 Japanese universities that offer courses in these subjects, 26 will comply to some extent with the government’s proposal, which came in a June 8 letter from Education Minister Hakubun Shimomura. In it, he encouraged Japan’s institutes of higher education to take “active steps to abolish [these programs]” or convert them to scholastic opportunities in the natural sciences.

Law and economics fall within the purview of the condemned disciplines. Seventeen universities will no longer recruit students to study them; the rest will eliminate elective courses within them. The Universities of Tokyo and Kyoto — Japan’s only two universities to clear the top hundred in world university rankings — said they would not heed the government’s call.

The vision is utilitarian, in line with Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s results-oriented drive to reassert Japan’s economic and political stature. Officials have expressed concern that Japanese research in the natural sciences is faltering, and so “rather than deepening academic research that is highly theoretical, we will conduct more practical vocational education that better anticipates the needs of society,” Abe said last year.

Last month, Takamitsu Sawa, president of Shiga University, wrote an op-ed in the Japan Times denouncing the ministry’s philosophy, calling its proposals “outrageous” and its leaders “anti-intellectuals.” She cited one member of an Education Ministry panel who purportedly claimed that humanities students at most Japanese universities should study “software programming for bookkeeping and accounting in place of Paul Samuelson’s ‘Economics,’ and the skills of orally translating between Japanese and English rather than reading Shakespeare’s works.”

Others in Japanese higher education have joined in the criticism. On July 23, the executive board of the Science Council of Japan — a multidisciplinary organization of Japanese scientists — released a statement expressing “profound concern” over the edict against the humanities and social sciences.

“Academics contribute to the creation of an intellectually and culturally enriched society … We see it as our duty to produce, enhance, and transfer in-depth and balanced accounts of knowledge about nature, the human beings, and society,” the statement read. “Thus, the [humanities and social sciences] make an essential contribution to academic knowledge as a whole.”
 
.
@Shantanu_Left @jamahir This is what I want the Indian Goverment to also do.Make humanities degrees expensive and this will steer more students towards STEM while at the same time reducing the JNU Jamia type nonsense. This is killing 2 birds with one stone.

I again ask you. What is the scientific contribution of these STEM institutes like Lovely Professional University and BITS Pilani ?

And as usual you go around in circles. It should be free and high-quality education for all where STEM and the humanities go hand in hand.

And obviously, the Australian humanities course is not humanitarian enough. I haven't seen any highly-visible statement by their Education Minister ( an arts graduate ) that the Australian presence in NATO's "democracy" bringing imperialist wars are wrong.

This is unfortunate; I think the whole world should move towards free education based on merit rather than incentivising and commodifying knowledge like so.

Indeed, free and a reformed education for all which will turn people into citizen scientists and socially responsible people as well.
 
.
I again ask you. What is the scientific contribution of these STEM institutes like Lovely Professional University and BITS Pilani ?

And as usual you go around in circles. It should be free and high-quality education for all where STEM and the humanities go hand in hand.

And obviously, the Australian humanities course is not humanitarian enough. I haven't seen any highly-visible statement by their Education Minister ( an arts graduate ) that the Australian presence in NATO's "democracy" bringing imperialist wars are wrong.



Indeed, free and a reformed education for all which will turn people into citizen scientists and socially responsible people as well.
Humanities has no contribution to society.

LPU and BITS graduates work in top tech companies to develop cutting edge technology

http://happenings.lpu.in/lpu-students-are-working-at-a-whopping-package-of-1-cr-or-above/

Even if you consider this as worthless what is the contribution of humanities students?

BTW LPU students pay from their own pockets not like the jholachhap JNU uncles and aunties

That is what Australia and Japan are doing. You want to study stupid subjects pay from your own pockets.

I will rather have 10 LPU then one JNU
 
.
LPU and BITS graduates work in top tech companies to develop cutting edge technology

http://happenings.lpu.in/lpu-students-are-working-at-a-whopping-package-of-1-cr-or-above/

Then get these Utkarshs, Nehas and Navtejs to come back to India and set up Indian Intels, QNXs, Microsofts, Samsungs and SpaceXs.

Let's give them two years to achieve at least an initial setup.

BTW LPU students pay from their own pockets

And how does that cancel out their non-contribution ?

I will rather have 10 LPU then one JNU

Yeah, surround yourself with drones ( which most of them are ).
 
Last edited:
.
Then get these Utkarshs, Nehas and Navtejs to come back to India and set up Indian Intels, QSSLs, Microsofts, Samsungs and SpaceXs.

Let's give them two years to achieve at least an initial setup.

Why? Working in a company is also productive. Just because you got kicked out for doing union baazi others should stop working in companies?

And how does that cancel out their non-contribution ?

Who says they are not contributing? The great freeloader @jamahir ?

And what they do they are doing with own money not mooching off taxpayers.

Yeah, surround yourself with drones ( which most of them are ).

Better than the azaadi gang of anti national urban naxals.
 
.
Why? Working in a company is also productive.

More productive would be to get ambitious and start an Indian QNX. The DRDO has been saying for years that with 150 engineers from across India they will design an operating system. Maybe ex-LPU Neha and Navtej can quit their jobs in the West, come to India and take a contract from DRDO and develop a fantastic OS for India. Would that be not more productive ? But are ex-LPU Neha and Navtej that capable of doing it by themselves ? Maybe they need someone like me to guide them.

Just because you got kicked out for doing union baazi others should stop working in companies?

1. I resigned and didn't get kicked out. Maybe I should just post a scan of my experience / relieving letter to get you to understand this once and for all.

2. I have experience of trying to start just one union. I had met the State Secretary for my state of one of India's public communist parties who has more experience in this sort of thing. He is an elderly man who has been to the USSR and Cuba. What would you say to him ? There are unions in India's public sector companies too and a union for banks.

3. Remember I had told you that in earlier times you would have made a good exploitative feudal lord or at least a munim of that feudal ?

Who says they are not contributing? The great freeloader @jamahir ?

Freeloaders are the IIMs and IIITs ( Indian Institutes of Information Technology ). What is their contribution ?

Freeloaders are the right-wingers. What is their contribution other than create chaos and strife ?
 
Last edited:
.
2. I have experience of trying to start just one union. I had met the State Secretary for my state of one of India's public communist parties who has more experience in this sort of thing. He is an elderly man who has been to the USSR and Cuba. What would you say to him ? There are unions in India's public sector companies too and a union for banks.

Unions are bad for a company as well as the country. A few years ago union workers lynched to death a manager at Maruti plant in Gurgaon. A good man lost his life, illiterate workers who were brainwashed by Lal Salaam comrades are in jail the company suffered because the production was shut for weeks, showrooms suffered because they did not sell cars, the buyers suffered because they could not get their dream car on time, petrol pump owners and mechanics suffered, the MSME who supplied to the plant suffered, the people working in those MSME suffered, the government suffered because they didn't get tax. Just about everyone suffered except the Union leaders who were not on the scene so didn't get the punishment.

Still think unions are good?

If I meet that leader I will tell him he is a big fool and an enemy of the economy.

Freeloaders are the IIMs and IIITs ( Indian Institutes of Information Technology ). What is their contribution ?

1000 time better than anything JNU has done.
 
.
A few years ago union workers lynched to death a manager at Maruti plant in Gurgaon. A good man lost his life, illiterate workers who were brainwashed by Lal Salaam comrades are in jail

I know about that incident. Firstly, it happened in Haryana where violent attitude is not unusual just like in UP. Secondly, how do you know if those workers were not incited by the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh which is the laborer branch of the RSS ?

Lastly on this, if the HR departments of companies weren't agents of exploitative managements the socialist groups wouldn't need to have union groups.

the company suffered because the production was shut for weeks, showrooms suffered because they did not sell cars, the buyers suffered because they could not get their dream car on time, petrol pump owners and mechanics suffered, the MSME who supplied to the plant suffered, the people working in those MSME suffered, the government suffered because they didn't get tax.

You are over-complicating the matter.

In any case you know my position on the automobile industry : ban of private vehicle ownership for personal usage.

1000 time better than anything JNU has done.

You are again going around in circles. I asked what is their contribution, other than be field agents for microfinance companies and be producers of useless, complicated graphs via PowerPoint presentation ?
 
.
Government should not interfere in schooling and scientific research. If you go back in history you will notice that most of the big brains weren’t government agents rather than free minds researching for their own.

Humanities are interesting and needed but they have no strong demand on the free market, the STEM subjects do. But the government shouldn’t subsidies one subject over the over. Let people decide what they want to study and what not without interference.

There is no such thing as „free Education“ if something is free for you it only means that somebody else’s money was used to provide for that service. And btw. just throwing money at a problem will not necessarily solve it! Have a look at the big social welfare facilities in the west. There are People here in Germany who haven’t worked for 30 years whilst being able to do so. This cannot be the solution!
 
.
There is no such thing as „free Education“ if something is free for you it only means that somebody else’s money was used to provide for that service. And btw. just throwing money at a problem will not necessarily solve it! Have a look at the big social welfare facilities in the west. There are People here in Germany who haven’t worked for 30 years whilst being able to do so. This cannot be the solution!

How will you explain the case of the USSR where education was free and USSR was a space power and also produced talented artistic people ?
 
.
How will you explain the case of the USSR where education was free and USSR was a space power and also produced talented artistic people ?
Where is the USSR now? And what lead to its downfall?
 
.
Where is the USSR now?

Are you denying its 69 year existence during which it was a powerhouse in all fields, something that Pakistan ( and India ) has not been able to achieve from 1947 until now - 29 years after the demise of the USSR ?

And what lead to its downfall?

I suppose mostly the foolishness of Gorbachev who did things like privatization of agricultural land instead of developing methods like collectivized Vertical Farming.
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom