What's new

Govt unlikely to probe 2014 sit-in to save civil-military relations

Devil Soul

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
22,931
Reaction score
45
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Govt unlikely to probe 2014 sit-in to save civil-military relations
Home / Today's Paper / Top Story / Govt unlikely to probe 2014 sit-in to save civil-military relations
By Ansar Abbasi
January 05, 2017
Print : Top Story
  • 0
  • 0
l_176942_095657_print.jpg



ISLAMABAD: All those who matter in the PML-N government know how some “disgruntled elements” from the military establishment had tried to oust Nawaz Sharif from power using the PTI-PAT sit-ins in 2014. However, the regime still has been reluctant to get the matter probed to save the civil-military relations.

It is believed that an inquiry into the 2014 sit-in “conspiracy”, if ordered by Prime Nawaz Sharif will lead to possible friction between the civil and military. Experiences relating to General ® Pervez Musharraf’s trial, have also contributed greatly to convince the decision makers in the PML-N government to ignore the matter for the sake of securing the system from destabilization.

Sources said that no one knows more than Prime Minister Nawaz about who did what during 2014 sit-in. However, he avoided not only discussing anything on the issue in public but also stayed away from probing the matter to avoid possible friction between civil and military.

The sources said that Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has shown extraordinary patience and kept many secrets close to his chest despite some convincing evidence.

During late 2015, defence minister Khawaja Asif in a television show named former DG ISI General Zaheerul Islam for his alleged role in destabilising the Nawaz Sharif government during 2014 PAT-PTI sit-ins. Khawaja Asif had said that General Zaheer was behind the “London Plan” conspiracy against the government.

What was being discussed earlier in the closed door meetings of the rulers, was made public by the defence minister, who said that the 2014 London Plan against the Nawaz Sharif government was the collective work of two successive ISI Chiefs- Lt General ® Shuja Pasha and Lt Gen ® Zaheerul Islam.

The defence minister’s statement was not appreciated by some military quarters during those days owing to which he was asked not to talk on the issue anymore. Later another cabinet member Mushahid Ullah Khan had to resign when he told a foreign new agency that the intelligence bureau had the telephone recordings of General Zaheerul Islam proving his involvement in the conspiracy.

A retired Brigadier Samson Simon Sharaf in one of his writings for a national English daily endorsed, “In a discussion packed with tension, Prime Minister confronted General Raheel with supposedly hard evidence (collected by state of art snooping equipment) of his complicity. On immediate verification, it turned out to be a fabrication and intrigue of rouge elements with no connection to GHQ. The ultimate objective was to replace General Raheel with a chum to put an end to counter terrorism operations.”

Despite government’s conviction that the 2014 sit-in was a conspiracy against the prime minister and in spite of available “evidence” suggesting that certain elements crossed their limits in violation of law and constitution, none of those suspected have been questioned either by the civilian government or the military leadership.

Khawaja Asif in his TV interview had said that Gen Zaheer had a grudge against the government for its stance on Geo issue after the April 2014 attack on Hamid Mir. To settle his personal grudge, Khawaja added, Gen Zaheer hurt the national interest. Khawaja was of the view that the situation was handled well by the prime minister, who remained patient.

Following of late controversy generated by Javed Hashmi’s statement, there is growing demand for holding an inquiry into the 2014 sit-in. However, it is highly unlikely that the government would still opt for a probe despite recent change of military command.

According to sources although initiation of any inquiry into the matter was then avoided, cold shoulder was given to one of the major alleged player of 2014 because he had become controversial. The said “player”, these sources said, was anxious to get any of the key post-retirement jobs, which fall under the military domain. However, he was not offered any job.
 
. . . . .
A retired Brigadier Samson Simon Sharaf in one of his writings for a national English daily endorsed

This retired Brigadier was himself part of the dharna team. He even posted here during that time and disappeared later, quite predictably.
 
.
That crooks don't keep corruption money or property in their own name Mayfair flats worth billions in kids names
 
.
Lol, these youthian thinks that they're contributing to the GDP growth rate by sit-ins, dharnas & long march. Totally pathetic.

Yes, you are correct. dharnas and long marches are only halal when mian saab does it. like the dharnas he did the dharna in the 90s against beinazir government after the Surrey palace scandal. or when he did islamabad long march to the red zone in 2012 against ppp govt. HAHAHAHAHA, phatwari

Money is already wasted on daily basis by panama gate drama.

daddy sharif doesn't have money trail to prove his millionaire daughters finances. phatwaris can't give a single reply back to all the documents presented and cry now because supreme court has clearly said that sharif family now has the burden of proof.

http://tribune.com.pk/story/1286243/onus-proof-london-flats-money-trail-lies-sharif-family-sc/
 
.
Lol, these youthian thinks that they're contributing to the GDP growth rate by sit-ins, dharnas & long march. Totally pathetic.


You must be joking?

The biggest obstacle to growth is PMLN.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/pakistan-pm-made-millions-in-uk-1179392.html
As long as corruption and unaccountability is rampant, Pakistan will never achieve high economic growth. At least PTI is doing something unlike PPP, and PMLN, whose corruption lies at the root of all of Pakistan problems.
 
.
Yes, you are correct. dharnas and long marches are only halal when mian saab does it. like the dharnas he did the dharna in the 90s against beinazir government after the Surrey palace scandal. or when he did islamabad long march to the red zone in 2012 against ppp govt. HAHAHAHAHA, phatwari
I was going to reply you until i saw the last word. Post reported.
 
.
I was going to reply you until i saw the last word. Post reported.

its been 8 hours and the admins have done nothing regarding my post. it's safe to assume that they dont give a shit about it or about you reporting it. looks like you have nowhere to hide now. so please, do answer with what ever "logic" you were going to present to justify the king of u-turns, nihari sharif's dharnas and long marches. you shud call yourself mr munafiqat.
 
. .
its been 8 hours and the admins have done nothing regarding my post. it's safe to assume that they dont give a shit about it or about you reporting it. looks like you have nowhere to hide now. so please, do answer with what ever "logic" you were going to present to justify the king of u-turns, nihari sharif's dharnas and long marches. you shud call yourself mr munafiqat.
Meh. Reported again.
 
.
No probe it. I do hope they probe it since these mofo's have already done dawn fiasco to malign the army so what else is left for this experienced team of liars and looters?
 
.
Meh. Reported again.

HAHAHAHAHA. phatwari run away like rats when confronted by facts. just like u are HAHAHAHAHA. be a man and do answer your "reply". because the truth is you never had a reply to give. why was nawaz sharif dharna against Benazir govt in the 90s halal???? why was nawaz sharif's long march to Islamabad red zone halal???? I dare you to answer these 2 questions
 
.
Back
Top Bottom