Govt supports prosecution of Subramanian Swamy for promoting hatred between Hindus, Muslims

[raktaka]

It is possible to identify hate speech. If Sadhvi Pagya says we should kick SRK to Pakistan, that is hate speech. If she said, SRK should go to Pakistan if he wants, then it is not hate speech. Someone says lets kill all Hindus, that is hate speech obviously. Someone says let us call Prophet Mohammed names, not a hate speech, because it does not cause any material or bodily harm to any muslim.

Ohh I think you are taking 'hate speech'(as a literal phrase) to mean any speech with words of hatred in it. 'Hate speech' is a legal term, very well understood. Blasphemy does not qualify as hate speech. All countries ban hate speech and different countries might have different exact definitions. But India's is the loosest, if someone is hurt a ban can be expected.

RUBBISH !!!

Sadhvi Pagya saying SRK should be kicked into pakistan IS NOT HATE SPEECH. That is her OPINION and She is ENTITLED to her Opinion.

Asking others to kill SRK is hate speech.


Hate speech is provoking other to BREAK THE LAW. Not provoking others to hate others.

 

[Roybot]

The practice is blasphemy according to Hinduism period. Whose Hinduism, don't ask me. Ask those who kill such couples. Just like according to some people's Islam, every muslim is supposed to kill apostates.Just like according to some member here, every Hindu is supposed to kill cow eaters, even if it means killing people.

Nobody can enforce a ban on such marriages in Andhra because there is a legal loophole in same Hindu personal law which allows exceptions for almost every thing in the law.

It is a taboo, not blasphemous.

Take Muslim personal laws for example, it expects you to adhere to Shariah, not following Shariah doesn't make you a blasphemer.

 

[raktaka]

And oh that loose cannon has to go...

WHY ?

It is a taboo, not blasphemous.

Take Muslim personal laws for example, it expects you to adhere to Shariah, not following Shariah doesn't make you a blasphemer.

Its not Taboo either.

Taboo is defined as "A taboo is a vehement prohibition of an action based on the belief that such behavior is either too sacred or too accursed for ordinary individuals to undertake, under threat of supernatural punishment."


Abusing god do not bring about any supernatural punishment. It is just an unwise thing to do for a host of reasons.

 

[illuminatidinesh]

WHY ?

He has done enough damage to BJP govt, and acts as if a saint. He will do more if he is not kicked out. I personally feel BJP would be better off with these people.

 

[Roybot]

WHY ?



Its not Taboo either.

Taboo is defined as "A taboo is a vehement prohibition of an action based on the belief that such behavior is either too sacred or too accursed for ordinary individuals to undertake, under threat of supernatural punishment."


Abusing god do not bring about any supernatural punishment. It is just an unwise thing to do for a host of reasons.

I meant cousin marriage is a taboo in North India.

 

[raktaka]

He has done enough damage to BJP govt, and acts as if a saint. He will do more if he is not kicked out. I personally feel BJP would be better off with these people.

1. What damage has he done to the BJP govt. ?

2. How has he acted like a "saint" ? He has never claimed to be one or acted like one. Explain your point.

3. Your personal opinions are irrelevant to me. He was invited to join the BJP.

 

[vsdoc]

What are you talking about. There are couples who got murdered for marrying within gotra.

Any of you guys on Twitter?

Is there a guy called Susu Swami there.

Apparently a pretty famous parody ID that takes on Subramaniam Swami.

 

[illuminatidinesh]

1. What damage has he done to the BJP govt. ?

2. How has he acted like a "saint" ? He has never claimed to be one or acted like one. Explain your point.

3. Your personal opinions are irrelevant to me. He was invited to join the BJP.

Dont quote me when my opinion is irrelevant to u. As simple as that.

 

[raktaka]

Dont quote me when my opinion is irrelevant to u. As simple as that.

You have posted your personal opinion on a public forum so its incumbent on you to explain your position.

 

[illuminatidinesh]

You have posted your personal opinion on a public forum so its incumbent on you to explain your position.

Exactly Mr Smart $$$$ In a public forum everyone s opinion is relevant, If u dont like ignore it.

 

[raktaka]

Exactly Mr Smart $$$$ In a public forum everyone s opinion is relevant, If u dont like ignore it.

I don't care for your personal opinion that " BJP is better off without him", dumb@ss. BJP obviously does not agree with you, nor does the vast majority of BJP supporters.

Now how about your justification to your other statements ? Still waiting for your reply.

 

[Roybot]

Any of you guys on Twitter?

Is there a guy called Susu Swami there.

Apparently a pretty famous parody ID that takes on Subramaniam Swami.

Are you on twitter doc?

 

[vsdoc]

Are you on twitter doc?

No a friend is very active and I keep hearing this subramaniam swami and susu swami saga from him.

I don't get this whole FB and twitter deal to be honest.

Even Whatsapp is a pain on groups.

 

[TopCat]

I like Swami Ji...
He is a true representation of India.
Hindu at the core of his career, married a non hindu parsi, married his daughter off to a Muslim. Hate monger yet sleep with his subjects... Truly an Indian.. a shrewd banya who makes money out of nothing.

 

[raktaka]

I like Swami Ji...
He is a true representation of India.
Hindu at the core of his career, married a non hindu parsi, married his daughter off to a Muslim. Hate monger yet sleep with his subjects... Truly an Indian.. a shrewd banya who makes money out of nothing.

He is a brahmin, not a baniya