What's new

Government and TLP reach agreement to end countrywide protests

its a democracy and majority will support TLP...so it will be a political suicide

Majority is misguided by this fake mullahs. Take out fake mullahs or install a better one(state friendly) which can control the majority.

This majority doesn’t even know what they are doing they are just following the stupid call of stupid mullahs.

If TLP had a majority then they would have taken more then 2 lac votes in elections.
 
.
Paid di siri wins it once again.

I am so much disappointed. Government surrendered to these goons once again.

So it’s a game for them. Create a reason, sabotage the state. Threat the institutions. Spread the hatred.
Create chaos and destruct the cities.

Say a “Mazraat” and get away with EVERYTHING like a boss.
If Govt agreed on some of their demands what demands Govt put to them?
Who pay 160 billion rupees we lost in three days? Who covered the lost of the vehicles they torched or destroyed the properties?
Why we ( the state )so ...... weak against them? AH was better to create a religious cult rather than a political party so state always bentdown to accept their demands?
This religious blackmailing is a good business in Pakistan.
Sad state of affairs.
 
.
The government in Pakistan is surely having no control. Mullahs, having no electrol mandate, are running the show....sad that a group of fanatics have managed to quiten a larger group.
 
.
Majority is misguided by this fake mullahs. Take out fake mullahs or install a better one(state friendly) which can control the majority.

This majority doesn’t even know what they are doing they are just following the stupid call of stupid mullahs.

If TLP had a majority then they would have taken more then 2 lac votes in elections.
Show me one alim/mullah just one who doesn't support him

The government in Pakistan is surely having no control. Mullahs, having no electrol mandate, are running the show....sad that a group of fanatics have managed to quiten a larger group.
Should we do what happened in golden Temple

Unlike india where elite control anything and everything from media to extremist behavior Pakistan has mixed bag situation ..media is mixed and will critize govt in case it used power..thats not an issue in business tycoon controllwd india media where killing or blindidng 100s of kashmir bring.absolute no question on indian govt but simply illogically blames Pakistan for it

Or babri masjod govt simply sits and looks upon how its doomed and suoreme court simply sits and gives in to hindu extremism
 
.
Ok
@That Guy if you get the Pm can u send it to me?
Don't have a pm.

No one support pan di sirri but the cause even metooo...period...

Ghazi Mumtaz Qadri Shaheed got punishment for what he did, Salman Taseer got what he deserved and why third proven accused Asia malouna set free?


Simply army don't want civil war...period....

@That Guy
P.M me if you want more details, why army hesitant to launch operation against pan di sirri.
I refuse to consider mumtaz qadri as shaheed.

But sure, pm me. As far as I can tell, the army just wants to stay away from domestic bickering.
 
. . .
What you would say about Ghazi Ilm Din?
Ask this, who defended him ?

quaid i azam

Would he condoned killing a governor who thought injustice was done to her (apprently he was right) ..obviously not...

This is nt the first time..many judges, ministers and freed acussed have been killed so far..

Any sane judge would either recuse himself or send the women to hang if he qants to save himself or family..last time a judge released a couple led to his assination while the current judges have already gotten money on there head
 
.
Ask this, who defended him ?

quaid i azam

Would he condoned killing a governor who thought injustice was done to her (apprently he was right) ..obviously not...

This is nt the first time..many judges, ministers and freed acussed have been killed so far..

Any sane judge would either recuse himself or send the women to hang if he qants to save himself or family..last time a judge released a couple led to his assination while the current judges have already gotten money on there head
there is no question of nature of the law. The blasphemy law is spot on and will remain. It needs to be stricter where the accuser will suffer the same fate if it is proven that they were lying. and it should also be extended to muslims as much as to nonmuslims.

the issue at hand is the nature of the verdict that casts serious doubts on the accusation.
 
.
What you would say about Ghazi Ilm Din?
I will not go in debate about who is Shaheed and who is not but No comparison between Ghazi i Uddin and Qadri
Qadri took law in his own hand to kill fellow Pakistani in Muslim country where you have court to put people on trial and punish them..
 
.
there is no question of nature of the law. The blasphemy law is spot on and will remain. It needs to be stricter where the accuser will suffer the same fate if it is proven that they were lying. and it should also be extended to muslims as much as to nonmuslims.

the issue at hand is the nature of the verdict that casts serious doubts on the accusation.
In fact there is nothing wrong..

except extremism and extra judiciary commentry..
they have to punish people who do extra judiciary commentry very hard..

problem is that once someone is accused he is considered guilty , even if released both the judge and the accused are killed as happened several times before..so judges than either refuse to hear the case as happened this time or simply pass a biased judgement
 
Last edited:
.
In fact there is nothing wrong..

except extremism and extra judiciary commentry..
they have to punish people who do extra judiciary commentry very hard..

problem is that once someone is accused he is considered guilty , even if released both the judge and the accused are killed as happened several times before..so judges than either refuse to here the case as happened this time or simply pass a biased judgement
agreed. this crap needs to stop. that's why it is just as important that if it is proved that the accuser was falsely accusing (not to be confused with unable to prove the accusation), then the accuser MUST suffer the SAME exact fate. And it is 100% Islamic, in accordance with the Islamic law that if the accuser of adultery isn't able to present 4 verifiable witnesses then the accuser shall get 80 lashes!
 
.
I will not go in debate about who is Shaheed and who is not but No comparison between Ghazi i Uddin and Qadri
Qadri took law in his own hand to kill fellow Pakistani in Muslim country where you have court to put people on trial and punish them..
How many people sent to gallows under this law? since the law enforced 15 or 18 convicted but no one hanged 6 to 8 still in jails without hanging.
 
.
What you would say about Ghazi Ilm Din?
Mumtaz Qadri killed a governor of Pakistan, without showing any evidence that the man had committed the crime he was accused of.

Also, what @ziaulislam said is the correct answer.

Don't try and entrap me with your misleading comparison.

How many people sent to gallows under this law? since the law enforced 15 or 18 convicted but no one hanged 6 to 8 still in jails without hanging.
Than take that up with the government, and question them. Don't take the law into your own hands. And people complain that Pakistan is becoming a lawless country; well, if people are becoming vigilantes, of course lawlessness is going to increase.
 
.
Mumtaz Qadri killed a governor of Pakistan, without showing any evidence that the man had committed the crime he was accused of.
Did you read FIR?
When Mumtaz Qadri humbly requested / ask Governor why he call blaspheme law kala qanoon the Governor replied and compare blaspheme law (nauzobilla) with his feces and in fit of rage Ghazi pumped his smg into Governor.

Than take that up with the government, and question them. Don't take the law into your own hands. And people complain that Pakistan is becoming a lawless country; well, if people are becoming vigilantes, of course lawlessness is going to increase
First of all I am not in favor of taking law in hand, neither in blocking roads and making common man's life hard but a peaceful protest is a right of any Pakistani.
Elected parliament should devise ways to enforce this law for all not just for Muslim majority.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom