Within two weeks of Blair's imperious announcement, it became obvious that I was not alone in thinking this matter had to be properly resolved once and for all. On 24 February 2004, newly appointed Libyan Prime Minister Shokri Ghanem stated very clearly that his country was not responsible for WPC Fletcher's murder, or for the bombing of Pan American Flight 103 in December 1988, but had paid compensation because it was the only way to 'buy peace'. Unlike his lackluster predecessors, Shokri Ghanem is a streetwise politician with detailed knowledge of Zionist blackmail techniques, and was making it very clear that Libya would not tolerate any more of them in the future.
"After the sanctions and after the problems we [Libya] have been facing because of the sanctions, the loss of money, we thought that it was easier for us to buy peace and this is why we agreed a compensation," Ghanem said in the interview, recorded in Libya. Asked whether the payment of compensation did not mean any acceptance of guilt by Libya, Ghanem replied: "I agree with that, and this is why I say we bought peace."
Before we look at exactly how Yvonne Fletcher was murdered, and examine the various investigations
that followed over the years, it is first necessary to establish my personal standing within the Hughes corporate pecking order. Experience over the years has proved that unless I do so now, the Zionist media will start a whispering vilification campaign against me, claiming I was merely an office boy with a grudge, and had no real knowledge of strategic matters or events at 8 St. James Square.
The two letters displayed below prove that I reported directly to the two most senior vice presidents of Hughes Corporation on a first-name basis, and was actively engaged in cost cutting measures at the corporate level. As any multinational expert will confirm independently, this verifies my senior management status within the organization. All junior staff are handled by middle managers way below vice presidential level. The dates on the two letters also prove that I was directly involved with Hughes Corporation at 8 St. James Square, during the critical period 2 April 1984 to 24 January 1985. To read either full-size letter, click on the appropriate image, then click "back" to return to this page.
Though I was not directly involved in the covert side of the business, it must be said that during 1984 there were some very spooky people working at 8 St. James, surrounded by iron-clad security that would have given Fort Knox a good run for its money. First there was Enserch Corporation with known links to the Israeli Mossad, headed by Vice President Frank Maier. Then there was Hughes Corporation with known links to the CIA, headed by Vice President Jim Bodhaine. Last but not least were two active-service CIA agents, whose presence was certainly known to the Home Office and Metropolitan Police Service, because both were licensed firear
ms holders
All covert operations involve deception and subtlety to a greater or lesser degree, and the operation planned for St. James was a masterful combination of both. The police present that day were briefed that a group of anti-Qadhafi demonstrators would be cordoned on the inner pavement of the Square, enabling them to demonstrate peacefully against Libyan staff situated in their embassy across the road at number five. As with all such briefings the police were told to keep both factions apart, with the dividing line being the road itself. Since there were only two groups opposing each other, it was 'obvious' that if a member of one of the two groups was injured, the other group would be responsible. So when Yvonne Fletcher was shot in the vicinity of the anti-Qadhafi demonstrators, the immediate assumption was that she must have been shot from the Libyan Embassy. Precise timing and confusing echoes reverberating around St. James Square, deliberately made it seem as though there was no other possibility.
Two professional television cameras hired by the Libyans were filming at the time, one located outside the Embassy at 5 St James, and the other outside 7 St James. In ballistics terms the footage from those two cameras provides most of the hard scientific proof needed to prove the shots could not have been fired by the Libyans, and confirms the firing platform was located in a building on the northern side of the square, well to the west of the Libyan Embassy. Forensic details from Yvonne Fletcher's post mortem provide the balance of irrefutable scientific evidence.
The Libyans knew in advance that several busloads of demonstrators were being imported from Manchester for a major demonstration, but they did not know why, hence the broadcast-quality television cameras hired from Worldwide News Services to provide a detailed record of events for the Libyan security service. In direct contrast, media crews from the BBC and ITN were ordered by their Zionist bosses to stay away. Though the BBC and ITN normally recorded all minor 'controversial' Muslim events, right down to a single worshipper praying to Mecca from his British place of work, the known forthcoming major demonstration in St. James Square on 17 April 1984 was placed strictly off limits.
Rather like the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas, the Zionist intent was to ensure their the covert operation would not be accidentally 'blown' later by any incriminating film or video footage which might reveal, for example, muzzle flashes in the wrong place, or injured people falling in impossible directions. It would also have been a major catastrophe if a western media crew had accidentally strayed into the line of fire from 8 St. James Square, thereby compromising the entire covert operation. The Zionists had two television crews on standby waiting to record emotionally supercharged images of the dead or dying WPC Yvonne Fletcher arriving at Westminster Hospital, but that was all.
Every frame of television footage you have ever seen about the murder of Yvonne Fletcher in St. James Square, is sourced back to those two Worldwide News cameras, and the Libyan Government holds copyright on every inch of the footage. The decision to hire Worldwide News was inspired, because unlike Dallas, the footage from these two cameras proves conclusively what really happened that day, and despite feeble Zionist protestations to the contrary, it always will.
Early on 17 April, crowd barriers were placed round the central garden pavements of St James Square, and also along the pavement to the east and west of the Libyan Embassy, providing a clear buffer zone occupied only by police officers. The anti-Qadhafi demonstrators were ushered behind the barriers in the inner square at 10.15 am and a gazetted police officer then personally positioned twenty police constables, including WPC Yvonne Fletcher, in an arc facing the inner square. Significantly, although there were more than fifty police personnel present in the Square, Yvonne Fletcher, the shortest and lightest constable in the entire Metropolitan Police Service, was the only female officer present.
As the constable with the lightest body weight facing multiple demonstrators of considerable bulk, every policing and riot control regulation says the gazetted officer should have positioned Yvonne well out on one of the flanks, but he did not do so. Yvonne Fletcher was deliberately positioned on the apex of the curve in front of the Libyan Embassy, directly in the chosen line of fire from 8 St James Square.
Superintendent "Alf" breached policing and riot control regulations by dismissing the Inspector and two Sergeants in charge of the serial of constables allocated to the demonstration, and then personally positioned Yvonne Fletcher in the direct line of fire from 8 St. James Square. As a reward for this appalling treachery, the Commissioner promoted Alf to Chief Superintendent and put him out to grass on a fat pension. Many years later when unexpectedly and aggressively interrogated by military personnel, Alf claimed lamely that he, "was promised she [Fletcher] would only get a bit of blood on her bare legs; that she would come to no serious harm." Think about it Alf, think about it. Those naughty Zionists at the Lodge lied to you, didn't they?
Just four minutes later at 10.19 am a 3-shot burst of automatic fire rang out. Yvonne Fletcher was hit by the first bullet in her upper right back. Bullet entry angle was 60 degrees from the horizontal, with an exit wound visible below the left rib cage. If the entry and exit wounds are lined up with her known height, and her televised position when the shots were fired, the line of fire backtracks precisely to the top floor of 8 St James Square. No other building in St James Square is high enough or at the correct azimuth to facilitate the sixty-degree downward shot. At the coronial inquest into her death, creative media deception 'proved' that Yvonne Fletcher was killed by a shot fired from the first floor of the Libyan Embassy, on her left-hand side at only 15 degrees from the horizontal!
Back in 1996 I wrote a paper on this, aimed primarily at forensic and ballistics experts, which has now been moved to the bottom of this new page as a technical appendix. Not everyone is interested in the sometimes confusing science of how bullets fly through the air, or what sort of damage they do when they eventually hit their targets. Suffice to say that when the deception was uncovered publicly back in 1996, the Zionists went into denial, claiming that my truth was a lie [Big Brother again], and that instead of being killed by a 150-grain bullet travelling at nearly 3,000 feet per second, Yvonne Fletcher was in fact killed by a puny little silenced 115-grain pistol bullet, traveling at only 900 feet per second.
Put simply, the assault bullet that killed Yvonne was so heavy and moving so fast, that it entered through her upper right back and then tore down through the center of her body, destroying all of the organs that got in its way, eventually exiting below her left rib cage with enough energy to damage Yvonne's left elbow. Now try to visualize this bullet as a runaway five-ton truck that roars in through the front wall of your house at 60 miles per hour, smashes its way through the corridor, and then knocks out your back door. Fine, of course it would, but the Zionists are now trying to make you believe that the five-ton truck was really only a Volkswagen Beetle sedan, crawling along at a pitiful 20 miles per hour. Are you really going to believe this pathetic Orwellian rubbish?
It is a fact that readers who have never visited St. James Square personally, will probably have significant difficulty visualizing any of the multiple events that happened in different places at slightly different times, but there is a way around this. Shown below are two small photomontages, overlaid on properly scaled maps drawn by the local council in Westminster. To view the giant photomontage that each represents, click on either small image and wait for its big brother to load in your browser. When you are finished, click "back" to return to this page.
The question has to asked whether the objective of the covert operation was simply to splatter a few demonstrators with shards of shrapnel, which would have been enough to swing public opinion against Libya. Perhaps the operation simply went wrong and Yvonne Fletcher was killed by mistake? No. The sound track analysis and film footage prove she was hit by the first shot in the 3-shot burst. The first shot in an automatic burst always hits its target, before the weapon "walks" slightly due to recoil effect. Therefore the assault rifle sights were lined-up directly on Yvonne Fletcher's back when the shooter squeezed the trigger.
There is plenty more proof of pre-meditation and the need for an exact field of fire, starting with the masked demonstrators themselves, who were deliberately brought in by bus from a city hundreds of miles to the north of London. Are we to believe that on 17 April 1984 there were no anti-Qadhafi demonstrators available locally in London?
Of course there were, but they were not told the covert demonstration was going to happen outside the Libyan Embassy, and were thus unable to attend. The last thing the Zionists wanted was a horde of unruly [but genuine] anti-Qadhafi demonstrators bursting through the police barriers, thereby blocking the view of Yvonne Fletcher's unprotected back from the shooter on the top floor of Enserch House, 8 St. James Square.
The tall thin man with a camera-briefcase, walking straight through the middle of the "secure" police cordon only seconds after Yvonne Fletcher was shot, is a Marrano solicitor who flew out of England the same evening for a pre-booked holiday overseas. When later brought back for the coronial inquest, he stated on oath that he had continued walking straight to work. Camera footage from Worldwide News proves the Marrano was lying under oath.. The right-hand photograph shows him later lurking by the side entrance of 8 St. James, apparently recording the police reaction to the covert operation. Though his name and address were given to the Metropolitan Police Service, he was never questioned or charged.
Hours after Yvonne's death, when the counter-terrorist squadron of the Special Air Service arrived by helicopter from Hereford, its members were advised by a gazetted police officer that the shots were fired from the Libyan Embassy at 5 St James Square. Good though the SAS normally is at countering terrorists in multiple environments, this wildly inaccurate police information made it impossible for the Squadron to successfully track down Yvonne Fletcher's ruthless killers.
There are few things more sacred to the British public than the safety of its proudly unarmed police force. The murder of a young unarmed policewoman on the streets of London immediately generated feelings of intense loathing in the British public towards the Libyans as the supposed killers. Unfortunately the public remained blissfully unaware of the real culprits, as the horrifying sight of Yvonne Fletcher dying was beamed across Britain into millions of homes.
Police Special Branch and MI5 had suspicions of course. The shots rang out for no obvious reason, and all seasoned officers understood only too well that for the Libyans to kill an unarmed policewoman in broad daylight on a London street was tantamount to committing diplomatic suicide. Making the task even harder for police was their exclusion from the first three days of COBRA intelligence meetings after the murder, chaired by the Deputy Prime Minister, while Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher was out of the country on an official visit to Portugal.
It was an entirely critical time when the police were in hot pursuit of the murderer of an unarmed British policewoman, and they had every right to storm the Libyan People's Bureau in order to search for evidence. Indeed the police wanted to storm the building, but permission was refused by the Chairman of COBRA. This is another man who must be thoroughly interrogated or punished, because storming the Libyan Embassy when the police wanted to, would have proved conclusively that no shots were fired from there at all. There was no logical reason nor legal impediment to stop them, so why did the Chairman of COBRA use his enormous power to deliberately block correct police procedure?
Members of the SIS [MI6] at the Foreign Office were demonstrably certain that Yvonne Fletcher was not killed by Libyans located in the Embassy, because after a creative media feeding frenzy and a bloodless siege that lasted until 22 April 1984, Britain broke off diplomatic relations with Libya and ordered the occupants of the Embassy to leave the country within seven days. They departed on 27 April, with no suspects being arrested or charged with her murder. Immediately after their departure the Libyan Embassy was entered and searched from top to bottom by military clearance experts looking for booby traps, weapons and ammo. Despite an exhaustive search of every nook and cranny in the building, nothing was found, a fact reported by the media the next day.
It was not until 2 May 1984, five days after the extensive military search, that the Metropolitan Police suddenly 'found' 4,367 rounds of 9-mm and .22 caliber ammunition, 7 pistols, two Sterling pistol grips and two Sterling magazines in the Libyan Embassy. On the face of it, 'Mr. Plod' had suddenly become much more skilled at finding concealed weapons and ammunition than the premier military explosive clearance team.
Who was fooling who? If the weapons and ammo were Libyan property they would certainly have been loaded into one of the 18 Libyan diplomatic bags which left the country unopened. Critically though, no Sterling sub-machine guns or 7.62-mm high velocity assault rounds were planted in the Libyan building to be later 'found' by the Metropolitan Police. There were sound reasons for this. Any complete Sterling sub-machine gun could be tested ballistically by forensic scientists, an event that had to be avoided at all costs because it would have exposed the deception; and 7.62-mm assault rounds had to be excluded because WPC Fletcher was notionally murdered with a low velocity 9-mm parabellum round: a fraudulent 'fact' officially recorded at the inquest into her death.
This is the weapon sighted personally by me inside 8 St. James a few days after Yvonne Fletcher's murder, though at the time I was unsure of its exact make and type, despite my extensive knowledge of military and sporting rifles. Many years later I was exhaustively questioned by independent military personnel, a process that led to positive photographic identification of the Heckler and Koch G3-A4, a specialized version of the 7.62 x 51-mm G3 high velocity military rifle, with a shortened barrel and 3-shot burst fire capability. Apparently, back in 1984 these highly specialized and shortened weapons were especially favored by certain diplomatic protection groups in Beirut, Lebanon.
The situation became more confusing in April 1985, when on the first anniversary of Yvonne Fletcher's pre-meditated murder, BBC2 Television ran a documentary in which an amateur video film of the demonstration was shown for the first time. The amateur camera allegedly recorded the sound of a 12-shot Sterling sub-machine gun burst, which concurred nicely with the coronial inquest findings of May 1984, and appeared to explain the inexplicable: eleven fired 9-mm bullets found by the Police during a search of St James conducted 10 days after the murder, in which time period the crime scene was not secured. Add to that the 9-mm bullet which allegedly killed Yvonne Fletcher but was not recovered from her body, and we have a neat figure of 12 rounds to match the forged video footage.
The amateur video footage provides an object lesson in how not to use forged evidence in an attempt to pervert the course of justice. The audio of a Sterling firing an 12-shot burst is real enough, but it was not recorded in St James Square, nor on the morning of the 17th April 1984 when Yvonne Fletcher was murdered. How is it possible to prove this? By relying on hard science and ignoring misleading Zionist media hype. Immediately before the murder, one of the professional cameramen filmed the front facade of the Libyan building, which was crossed diagonally by a clear shadow line cast by the sun. The exact time was accurately calculated using survey techniques and astronomical data from the Greenwich Observatory in London.
The forged amateur footage also shows a sun line diagonally crossing the front of the Libyan building, but unfortunately it is in the wrong place and at the wrong angle for 10.19 am on the morning of 17 April 1984. More convincing for the layman reader is the car parked in front of the Embassy. On the professional video the car is an unoccupied blue Peugeot sedan with its bonnet positioned between the two windows to the left of the Bureau entrance. On the blatantly forged amateur video, the unoccupied blue Peugeot sedan magically transforms itself into a white station wagon, starts its own engine, then drives itself five feet closer to the Libyan Embassy front door.
For forensic scientists there are a staggering number of other errors on the footage providing 100% proof of forgery, including the sun shadow line failing to shade the bonnet of the "new" white station wagon; the green Libyan flag vanishing from the pole above the Embassy front door, and a tall black street light to the right of the Bureau disappearing completely. There is no doubt the forged footage was prepared in order to forever cement the reversed Orwellian media "truth" in the minds of the British Parliament and people. Anyone daring to challenge this reverse media 'truth' would be patted indulgently on the head and given a copy of the BBC2 film, complete with the damning forged amateur video footage 'proving' the Libyans fired an entirely imaginary Sterling sub-machine gun burst that day.
Photos on the left and right are from the forged 'amateur' BBC video of 1985 that senior officers of the Metropolitan Police Service have steadfastly refused to investigate for 18 long years. Try looking on this as a challenge, and pretend you are a police investigator. You already have plenty of [real] images from the Worldwide News cameras. Now see how many of the twenty-one errors on the forged video frames you can personally detect.
Ultimately the ploy failed. Unwittingly perhaps, the filmmakers proved their own video footage was deliberately forged, and thus in turn proved they were accessories after the fact to the murder of an unarmed British policewoman on the streets of London. WPC Yvonne Joyce Fletcher, ruthlessly sacrificed on television at the age of twenty-five, was laid to rest at her local village church in the county of Wiltshire with full police honours. One of her more cynical mourners was the very same man who denied Yvonne's superiors the right to enter the Bureau at 5 St James Square, and prove no shots were fired by the Libyans that day: The Chairman of COBRA.
