What's new

Global competitiveness: Pakistan stands last in South Asia, India jump 16 spots

ni8mare

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Apr 19, 2013
Messages
2,607
Reaction score
-5
Country
India
Location
India
KARACHI: Pakistan has been ranked at 122, last amongst its South Asian neighbours, in the Global Competitiveness Index (GCI) by the World Economic Forum (WEF).
The forum has ranked India at 39th spot, followed by Sri Lanka 71, Bhutan 97, Nepal 98 and Bangladesh at 106 at the GCI, reports the Business Reporter, a financial daily of Pakistan.
The Global Competitiveness Report 2016-17 competitiveness ranking is based on the Global Competitiveness Index (GCI), which was introduced by the WEF in 2005.
Defining competitiveness as the set of institutions, policies and factors which determine the level of productivity of a country, the calculations of the GCI scores are made by drawing together country-level data covering 12 categories — the pillars of competitiveness — that collectively make up a comprehensive picture of a country's competitiveness.
The 12 categories, or the pillars of competitiveness are-institutions, infrastructure, macroeconomic environment, health and primary education, higher education and training, goods market efficiency, labour market efficiency, financial market development, technological readiness, market size, business sophistication, and innovation.
Among 114 global competitiveness indicators, Pakistan this year showed improvements on 54 key indices, whereas on 50 indices the country lost its previous position, while 10 indices remained same as last year.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...book.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=TOI
 
.
Global Competitiveness Index: Pakistan improves, but remains among bottom 20 economies
SHARE TWEET
Global Competitiveness Index: Pakistan improves, but remains among bottom 20 economies
By Shahbaz Rana
Published: September 28, 2016
66SHARES
SHARE TWEET EMAIL
1189598-lhr_mltn_flag_app-1475009543-776-640x480.jpg

On indicators like reliance on professional management, production process sophistication, willingness to delegate authority and university and industry collaboration in research and development, Pakistan also showed better progress this year. PHOTO: APP

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan remained among the bottom 20 in the list of 138 countries ranked on the influential Global Competitiveness Index of the World Economic Forum and is at the bottom among South Asian economies, trailing behind even Nepal and Bangladesh.

The 2016-17 Global Competitiveness Report, which this time compared governance in 138 countries, ranked Pakistan 122nd – 16 from the bottom compared to 14th from the bottom last year. Last year, the WEF had conducted survey in 140 nations and Pakistan was placed at 126th.

Pakistan rated among top emerging economies

Although Pakistan improved its ranking by two notches, its score is still below the 2007 level, suggesting that the country has not sustained the competitiveness gains made during General retired Pervez Musharraf’s era.

This year, among 114 global competitiveness indicators, Pakistan showed improvements on 54 key indices, whereas on 50 indices the country lost its previous position. In 10 indices, the position remained the same as last year.

One of the positive aspects of the report for Pakistan is that public trust in politicians significantly increased and Pakistan was ranked at 85 this year – a leap of 14 points.

Pakistan has been making gradual progress, although still there is a lot of room to improve, said Dr Miftah Ismail, Board of Investment (BoI) chairman. His said the government was working towards the target of getting in the top 100 economies ranked by the WEF.

Pakistan’s flaws

The Global Competitiveness Report 2016-2017 also identified corruption as the most problematic factor for doing business in Pakistan – for the consecutive second year – followed by crime and theft, tax rates, access to finance and government instability.

Judicial independence was further compromised last year, which is constantly on the decline since the PML-N government has come into power, showed the findings of the report.

Pakistan lagging behind other South Asian states

Pakistan, at 122, ranks last amongst its South Asian neighbours, where India leads at 39th followed by Sri Lanka 71st, Bhutan 97th, Nepal 98th and Bangladesh at 106th, according to the report.

Since 2007, the gap between the best and worst performing economies in the South Asian region has increased in some of the drivers of competitiveness, mostly because of the deteriorating situation in Pakistan, noted the authors of the report. The quality of infrastructure has improved significantly in India, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka, while it stalled in Nepal and deteriorated in Pakistan, it added.

The WEF finds that Pakistan’s state institutions such as the judiciary appear to have weakened, efficiency of the legal framework in settling dispute has been compromised and efficacy of the corporate board is not up to the mark. On the index of judicial independence, Pakistan had been ranked 57th in 2012-13 and now it has slipped to the 88th position.

The quality of port infrastructure and air transport has further deteriorated, life expectancy has declined, the quality of primary education has deteriorated, the prevalence of non-tariff barriers to trade has further increased and the effects of heavy taxation has affected investment climate. The survey finds that Pakistan is losing the capacity to retain talent, the Securities Exchanges regulations have weakened and the availability of scientists and engineers has decreased.

Out of 16 Pakistani departments, the performance of nine critical bodies has deteriorated when compared at the global level. The performance of State Bank of Pakistan, Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan, Customs, Accountant General of Pakistan Revenue, Trade Development Authority of Pakistan and Civil Aviation Authority has further deteriorated.

Some respite

Pakistan has shown improvements on some of the key indicators to improve its global competitiveness, said Amir Jahangir, Chief Executive Officer of Mishal Pakistan, the country partner institute of the WEF.

Police Services, Competition Commission of Pakistan, Intellectual Property Organization and National Electric Power Regulatory Authority performance improved this time.

China has so far poured $14b into CPEC projects

g1-13.jpg


Among the areas where Pakistan made progress, were reduction of burden of government regulations, business costs of crime and violence reduced, the cost of terrorism slightly lessened, reliability of police services improved, the quality of railroad infrastructure was better and the quality of electricity supply was superior relative to the last year.

People believed that the quality of education further improved in Pakistan where the country is now ranked 71st. On indicators like reliance on professional management, production process sophistication, willingness to delegate authority and university and industry collaboration in research and development, Pakistan also showed better progress this year.

Published in The Express Tribune, September 28th, 2016.

Like Business on Facebook, follow @TribuneBiz on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.
 
.
Lanka slips in global competitiveness ranking; India best performer




Sri Lanka has slipped three positions to languish at number 71 in the latest ranking of global competitiveness by the World Economic Forum whilst neighbouring giant India has emerged as the best performer.

Released yesterday, the WEF’s Global Competitiveness Report 2016/17 identified Sri Lanka as the most advanced economy in the South Asian region but noted the country has slipped three positions to 71st out of 138 countries assessed, but with a stable score.

“After years of conflict, the country needs to concentrate on triggering the efficiencies that will drive further growth—for example, by restructuring the labour market and investing in technological readiness, where it lags significantly behind economies at a similar stage of development,” the WEF’s GCR said.

Countries were assessed on 12 pillars and Sri Lanka’s performance was mixed under three sub-indexes Basic requirements ranked at 64, efficiency enhancers (83) and Innovation and sophistication factors (46). The pillars and Sri Lanka’s respective global ranking were Institutions (64), Infrastructure (57), Macroeconomic environment (73), Health and primary education (37), Higher Education and training (68), Goods market efficiency (66), Labour market efficiency (128), Financial market development (64), Technological readiness (101), Market size (60), Business sophistication (53) and Innovation (43).

In terms of most problematic factors for doing business, the WEF Executive Opinion Survey 2016 listed policy instability as the biggest concern followed by access to financing and inefficient government bureaucracy and tax rates.

As per the report, Switzerland, Singapore and the United States remain the world’s most competitive economies with India being the highest rising economy, climbing 16 places to be ranked at No 39.

It also finds declining openness is threatening growth and prosperity and noted monetary stimulus measures such as quantitative easing are not enough to sustain growth and must be accompanied by competitiveness reforms.

“Our data suggests that the degree to which economies are open to international trade in goods and service has been declining for ten years and that this could hurt prosperity in the future. We also consider the impact of competitiveness on monetary stimulus packages such as quantitative easing,” the WEF GCR said.

For emerging economies, the report said updated business practices and investment in innovation are now as important as infrastructure, skills and efficient markets.

Focusing on the region, the report said South Asia continues its upward trend and competitiveness improves in most economies in the region, which is experiencing positive economic momentum, and in 2016 is set to grow more quickly than China for the first time in more than 20 years. Over the past decade, the subcontinent has focused on improving overall health and primary education levels and upgrading infrastructure, areas of particular importance for future diversification and preparedness given the resource-driven nature of the regional economies.

In the health and primary education and the infrastructure pillars, South Asia’s average score has increased by 0.5 and 0.3 respectively since 2007, but infrastructure remains the region’s second weakest pillar, just after technological readiness. Investment in these areas will be vital to fully unlock economic growth. As they move up the development ladder, it will also be increasingly important for South Asian economies to establish competitiveness agendas to improve the functioning of their labour and financial markets, which have deteriorated over the last 10 years.

The region remains diverse, with a core of three heavyweight economies—India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh—surrounded by smaller ones such as Bhutan, Nepal, and Sri Lanka, each with its own peculiarities and unique development path. Since 2007, the gap between the best- and worst-performing economies in the region has increased in some of the drivers of competitiveness, mostly as a result of the deteriorating situation in Pakistan.

The quality of infrastructure has improved significantly (although from low levels) in India, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka, while it stalls in Nepal and deteriorates in Pakistan. Pakistan is also the only economy that fails to improve its macroeconomic environment and health and primary education levels, falling behind other South Asian economies. Financial market development remains poor across the entire region, as does technological readiness; this last area improves significantly only in Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, which overtook India to become the best performer in this pillar in the region.

India leads the group of South Asian economies. Following its 16-point rise in our Global Competitiveness Index in 2015, India climbs a further 16 points this year, reaching 39th. This is the highest rise of any economy this year. India is now the second most competitive BRICS economy, behind China (28).

India’s improvement has largely been across the board, although stellar areas of improvement include; public institutions (up 16 to 42), increasing transparency in the financial system (up 15 to 38). However the WEF report noted that India is still long way from having in place all the competitiveness elements to realize its potential as a major global economy. Its labour market is still bound by rigid regulations and centralized wage determination (112); it ranks only 110th in terms of technological readiness (although here it climbs 10 places). Infrastructure 68th also remains a bottleneck even though it climbs 13 places.

The two Himalayan economies, Bhutan (97th) and Nepal (98th), both improve their positions this year, by eight places and one place, respectively. Infrastructure and connectivity are bottlenecks for both economies but, thanks to heavy investments in hydroelectric power, Bhutan can rely on a high-quality electricity supply (41st). Nepal boasts the best macroeconomic environment in the region and, after significant recent improvement, the second highest level of health and primary education.

Pakistan trails the group of South Asian economies. Its upward trend of recent years continues with an advance of four places to 122nd, although its score is still below the 2007 level. The climate of instability during this period has surely weighed down the country’s economic development.


- See more at: http://www.ft.lk/article/570270/Lan...ng--India-best-performer#sthash.pUlGuXzo.dpuf
 
.
India still has a very very long way to go. Indian bureaucracy, permit raj with long waits, corruption at every level and the sheer immobility of labor and skills makes a India a laggard in a globalised world. This is not the time of congratulating each other but a time to drive through with laser like focus the immense backlog of reforms in tax, labor, company laws, corruption laws and enforcement, banking etc etc etc.
Most Indians view and know India in isolation, working and living in an open economy would show up the immense gulf that still needs to be traversed.
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom