Global anti-China sentiment on the rise: poll

[vish]

haha we are not win but USA want to negotiate at first maybe u history is not
good. Meanwhile China do not want to any country fear us because we like peace.

Rather than doubting my knowledge of history; please check yours first.

Your country's expansionism is well known.

 

[gpit]

How did China win the Korean War?

The objective of the PLA was to dsestroy the US forces in the peninsula, which by the way did not happen.

The PLA lost half of its gains later in the war.

The Korean War was a stalemate.

Nobody fears the rise of China; what we fear is your country's communist "expansionism," which is getting new wings due to your new found prosperity.

About Korea War, you obviously only believe Western propaganda.

Chinese slogan at that time was: "protection of our family and country." and "fight US and support (N) Korea." because US dropped bomb within China.

That protection goal has been achieve, and the whole situation nearly back where it was started.

 

[gpit]

Rather than doubting my knowledge of history; please check yours first.

Your country's expansionism is well known.

In 1949, PRC had land disputes with nearly every neighbor country. Now it resolves them all but the one with India.

In a stark contrast, India still has land dispute with Pakistan, China, BD, just as it was in 1947.

If PRC had expansionism, how could majority of the problems solved?

If India had not have expansionism, how come none of its land disputes solved?

 

[vish]

About Korea War, you obviously only believe Western propaganda.

Chinese slogan at that time was: "protection of our family and country." and "fight US and support (N) Korea." because US dropped bomb within China.

That protection goal has been achieve, and the whole situation nearly back where it was started.

Everything against your opinion or against any of China's policies is Western propaganda, isn't it?

The PLA wanted a communist regime on the entire Korean Peninsula; it's objective was to destroy the UN forces in the region. It lost most of its gains and the conflict ended in a stalemate. The PLA was unable to destroy the UN forces.

This is the reason why we have two Koreas (one free and the other not-free), and not one totalitarian state.

 

[vish]

In 1949, PRC had land disputes with nearly every neighbor country. Now it resolves them all but the one with India.

In a stark contrast, India still has land dispute with Pakistan, China, BD, just as it was in 1947.

If PRC had expansionism, how could majority of the problems solved?

If India had not have expansionism, how come none of its land disputes solved?

The majority of the PRC's problems have been solved by the use of force; interesting to note that this use of force is restricted to "weaker" oponents.

India is expansionist? Is that the reason why most of our war-gains are nihilated on the bargaining table?

The only reason why the PRC is still having land disputes with India is because the PLA isn't powerful enough to "teach us a lesson," without engaging in a suicidal total war.

 

[nitesh]

In 1949, PRC had land disputes with nearly every neighbor country. Now it resolves them all but the one with India.

In a stark contrast, India still has land dispute with Pakistan, China, BD, just as it was in 1947.

If PRC had expansionism, how could majority of the problems solved?

If India had not have expansionism, how come none of its land disputes solved?

India has attacked which country with whom it has land disputes? There are two methods of solving a problem wither through dialog or through force. PRC has used force to get there claims against the WEAKER neighbors. They tried it with India also in 1962, but alas not worked to there satisfaction. Whereas India has always taken the route of Dialogue. Dont make such useless statements.

 

[gpit]

The majority of the PRC's problems have been solved by the use of force; interesting to note that this use of force is restricted to "weaker" oponents.
...

Hopefully trying to figure out the following by yourself, you’ll be brought back from your delusive mentality:

1) Which war resolves Sino-Pakistan border problem?
2) Which war resolves Sino-Burma border problem?
3) Which war resolves Sino-Korea border problem?
4) Which war resolves Sino-Kirgizstan border problem?
5) …

The rest of your statements are worthy no action but brushed away like trash, as you’ve successfully demonstrated your laughable paucity of knowledge.

 

[gpit]

India has attacked which country with whom it has land disputes? ...

Your selective amnesia is truly remarkable!

Here is your recipe:

Indo-Pakistan Wars.
Annexation of Hyderabad (1948).
Annexation of Goa (1961).
Sino-Indian War (1962).
Indian-Bangladesh Border Conflict (2001).

And you call all these dialogue?

 

[vish]

Which war resolves Sino-Pakistan border problem?

Pakistan went head over heals to placate PRC; PRC went head over heals to prep up Pakistan. The reason: containment of India.

Which war resolves Sino-Burma border problem?

Surely buying some generals isn't that difficult, is it?

Which war resolves Sino-Korea border problem?

Which Korea? The one with "Dear Leader." No further comments.

Which war resolves Sino-Kirgizstan border problem?

You mean, for a long time the Sino-KyrgyzstanSSR border? Man, I wonder why wasn't that resolved...

The recent agreement by both sides ensured no further mischief on either side: more a necessity given PRC's resource crunch and Krygyzstan's capital crunch. But I do concede, PRC conducted negotiations.

The rest of your statements are worthy no action but brushed away like trash, as you’ve successfully demonstrated your laughable paucity of knowledge.

I shall shrug off the personal attack on the premise that since you're unable to counter my argument and you consequently assume that my arguments reflect my "laughable paucity of knowledge."

A case of sour grapes I must say.

 

[vish]

Indo-Pakistan Wars.

Read further and you'll know the truth.

Annexation of Hyderabad (1948).

Again, read further.

Annexation of Goa (1961).

Again, read further.

Sino-Indian War (1962).

The war where the PLA attacked an unprepared and barely-equipped Indian Army?

The one where the PLA withdrew when the IA mobilized?

You launched the war, we didn't.

Indian-Bangladesh Border Conflict (2001).

Point taken.

Let me make one thing clear on this topic; itchy fingers and inflated egos.

Have a look at the diplomatic efforts after this incident.

Also, there are a lot of things that go on in the Indo-Bangladesh border.

 

[ddrbdgzy]

China's popularity around the world is on the decline amid concerns over unsafe products, military prowess and economic power ahead of the summer Olympics, a survey suggested on Thursday.

"Positive views fell significantly in nine of 21 countries in which polls were taken in 2007, as well as the current survey," said the Pew Global attitudes project, which surveyed 24,000 people in 24 countries.

"Opinions of China tumbled the most in France (47 per cent to 28 per cent) and in Japan (20 per cent to 14 per cent)."

Among the key areas of concern were China's growing economy and military abilities.

"Negative views of China's military prowess are common in the US and Europe -- more than seven in 10 in the US, France, Britain, Germany, Spain, Russia and Poland consider it a bad thing for their own countries," the report said.

Japan showed the highest rate of concern (90 per cent) and South Korea, where 87 per cent see China's rising military strength as a bad thing for their country.

Eight-two per cent of Americans said China's military power was a bad thing, while views of the economy showed more of a divide -- 35 per cent saying it was a good thing for America and 53 per cent viewing it as a bad thing.

"Generally, publics around the world find China's growing economic power less troubling than its increasing military strength," it said.

Majorities of those polled in Pakistan, Lebanon, Indonesia, Jordan, Australia and Brazil as well as Tanzania, South Africa and Nigeria said China's economy had a positive effect on their countries.

One the other hand, majorities in France, Germany, South Korea and the United States saw China's economic power as a bad thing.

The survey also found "considerable skepticism about the quality of Chinese products," particularly in the United States where nearly three in four people view Chinese products as less safe than products made elsewhere.

"In 19 of 24 countries, at least half of those surveyed say Chinese products are generally less safe than those produced elsewhere," it said. The notable exception was in China itself, where 65 per cent said Chinese products were just as safe.

The poll was taken March 17-April 21 -- after China's March crackdown on dissidents in Tibet, and before the devastating earthquake on May 12 in Sichuan province.

When it came to the Olympic Games, hosted by Beijing this summer, "international opinion largely approves," Pew said, noting that 14 of 23 countries showed majorities saying the move was a good thing.

Link:India News Online

the writter of this article is only a clown, and i have no interst to remark on it, but i despise him and his article

 

[vish]

the writter of this article is only a clown, and i have no interst to remark on it, but i despise him and his article

Hey, good to see you. Been a long time...

The writer merely referenced a research by a think tank or a study group...

 

[ddrbdgzy]

Hey, good to see you. Been a long time...

The writer merely referenced a research by a think tank or a study group...

hi, long time no see, nice to meet you again at forum.

 

[Tiki Tam Tam]

G piuts

Educate yourself and not give the usual mealy mouthed Communist platitudes.

Enumerate each point and you shall have a reply.

 

[Sino-PakFriendship]

China's popularity around the world is on the decline amid concerns over unsafe products, military prowess and economic power ahead of the summer Olympics, a survey suggested on Thursday.

"Positive views fell significantly in nine of 21 countries in which polls were taken in 2007, as well as the current survey," said the Pew Global attitudes project, which surveyed 24,000 people in 24 countries.

"Opinions of China tumbled the most in France (47 per cent to 28 per cent) and in Japan (20 per cent to 14 per cent)."

Among the key areas of concern were China's growing economy and military abilities.

"Negative views of China's military prowess are common in the US and Europe -- more than seven in 10 in the US, France, Britain, Germany, Spain, Russia and Poland consider it a bad thing for their own countries," the report said.

Japan showed the highest rate of concern (90 per cent) and South Korea, where 87 per cent see China's rising military strength as a bad thing for their country.

Eight-two per cent of Americans said China's military power was a bad thing, while views of the economy showed more of a divide -- 35 per cent saying it was a good thing for America and 53 per cent viewing it as a bad thing.

"Generally, publics around the world find China's growing economic power less troubling than its increasing military strength," it said.

Majorities of those polled in Pakistan, Lebanon, Indonesia, Jordan, Australia and Brazil as well as Tanzania, South Africa and Nigeria said China's economy had a positive effect on their countries.

One the other hand, majorities in France, Germany, South Korea and the United States saw China's economic power as a bad thing.

The survey also found "considerable skepticism about the quality of Chinese products," particularly in the United States where nearly three in four people view Chinese products as less safe than products made elsewhere.

"In 19 of 24 countries, at least half of those surveyed say Chinese products are generally less safe than those produced elsewhere," it said. The notable exception was in China itself, where 65 per cent said Chinese products were just as safe.

The poll was taken March 17-April 21 -- after China's March crackdown on dissidents in Tibet, and before the devastating earthquake on May 12 in Sichuan province.

When it came to the Olympic Games, hosted by Beijing this summer, "international opinion largely approves," Pew said, noting that 14 of 23 countries showed majorities saying the move was a good thing.

Link:India News Online

Who fuckin' care


Chinese anti-Western sentiment on the rise


West =/= The World / International