Give the dog a bad name

[RAHUL INDIAN]

maoists are taking money from the illegal mining and protecting them.... it is a force to guard the illegal mining activities..

they dont protect the poor, they dont want development in that area and govt rule otherwise the illegal mining will be at risk.....

that is the maoists and the business of illegal mining for whose protection they are created and alongwith taking money from China for destabalising India....

They are goons/terrorists/hired criminals...

if they want to do any good, what about

1)teaching the poor people.
2)atatcking the illegal mining activities.
3) Askign Govt/NGOs for support to create facilities in the villages.
4) Opposing any wrong policy of the state, if they dont like(they can be supported by Arundati Roy as she claims to be their well wisher then why not show it with deeds and figt gor their cases in courts if state does some illegal thing to them)...
5) Talk to govt and ask for where the funds for development are utilised.
6) Indulge people in self help groups so they start earning small amount of money on their own.
7)Celebrate every new school or hospital that is created and demand for more of them.


no nothing of the above points they want. What they only want is power--> money, and loot the state of India like they are right now by protecting the mining activities and getting crores from them.

for maoists ,to hell the ppl of those state, the maoists dont care, the moaists are preventing any kind of development activity in that area, how can they be the supporter of those ppl, they are the biggest hurdle in development of that area.

 

[Awesome]

Do I have to ban like 5 Indians each time Arundhati Roy writes an article. Please keep the discussion civil.

 

[Justin Joseph]

Do I have to ban like 5 Indians each time Arundhati Roy writes an article. Please keep the discussion civil.

sir,

I humbly want to know when LCA or other defence related thread get deleted

"Thread deleted by AgNoStIc MuSliM
Reason: there is a dedicated thread for LCA"

Then why not a single Moist thread get deleted as there is a dedicated sticky thread for Maoist. In spite of being non defense thread in a defense section.

Thanks

 

[Spring Onion]

She lives of such cheap publicity. Do you know there is a case against Arundhati Roy for illegally purchasing Tribal Land for some farmhouse? And its ironic she is the one who is fighting against goverment pointing fingers at Tatas and Jindals for building factories on tribal lands.
I hate this hippie yellow journalism. She even passed her rants in one of her article where she says Indians are trying ti simply equate 26/11 to 9 /11. That is sick. Arundhati Roy should be shot dead and buried upside down

And for 'cheap' publicity she dares to visit Maoists' camps which NO male counterpart of her in Media could dare to do. ???

NO i think she is a brave lady and she is speaking some truth. Listen to her, she is talking about all the faults which Indian govt had been committing in dealing with this issue.


As far as cases against her well have anyone of you noticed that an FIR/case was filled against her because she travelled to Maoists areas .

 

[Justin Joseph]

And for 'cheap' publicity she dares to visit Maoists' camps which NO male counterpart of her in Media could dare to do. ???

NO i think she is a brave lady and she is speaking some truth. Listen to her, she is talking about all the faults which Indian govt had been committing in dealing with this issue.


As far as cases against her well have anyone of you noticed that an FIR/case was filled against her because she travelled to Maoists areas .

She don't have any danger from Maoist as she is one of them and she is their propagandist and a foreign agent.

 

[Ras]

Roy is a no body.

But the issues with the tribals are real. Kicking people out of their land to mine for minerals is not the way to go.

 

[Spring Onion]

She don't have any danger from Maoist as she is one of them and she is their propagandist and a foreign agent.

Foreign Agent of whom??

 

[Iggy]

And for 'cheap' publicity she dares to visit Maoists' camps which NO male counterpart of her in Media could dare to do. ???

What are you talking about??She is not a media person ..she is just a writer ..and yes she is doing for media publicity only..its same as like Imran Khan saying peacefull talk with TTP..hope you agree with him saying that..

NO i think she is a brave lady and she is speaking some truth. Listen to her, she is talking about all the faults which Indian govt had been committing in dealing with this issue.

for the foreign audience she may be but not for us..she is not talking about the truth..she is talking about AK-47's and Insas..if the government wanted to destroy the tribals then why no tanks??no airfoce,why no helicopter gunships??only the stardard weapons which are using by the CRPF is used against the maoists..no heavy weaponry at all..While she talking about th government..why she is ignoring the facts of maoists raping their own caders,killing innocents and also protecting illegal mining's for money??

As far as cases against her well have anyone of you noticed that an FIR/case was filled against her because she travelled to Maoists areas .

Madam care to show me the link where was the FIR being lodged against her??or is it another imagination from you?and even if FIR is filed what wrong??she is associating with a banned organisation and she should be punishable by Indian law..

 

[Justin Joseph]

Foreign Agent of whom??

Rest assure I'm not pointing towards pak/ISI, pak don't have any hand in this issue.

 

[RobbieS]

Well for all our anger against Arundhati Roy, she does talk about things and issue that us privileged folks in cities don't want to. Although she's too hyperbolic and uses controversial statements to get her points across she raises issues that very few others are talking about. Now I am no leftist, but the truth is that the human angle to the Maoist problem is often overlooked. And by staying in the news she at least manages to remind the people that a military solution may not be the only solution and we have to consider the rights of the tribals. And we should at least thank her for that.

 

[Iggy]

Well for all our anger against Arundhati Roy, she does talk about things and issue that us privileged folks in cities don't want to. Although she's too hyperbolic and uses controversial statements to get her points across she raises issues that very few others are talking about. Now I am no leftist, but the truth is that the human angle to the Maoist problem is often overlooked. And by staying in the news she at least manages to remind the people that a military solution may not be the only solution and we have to consider the rights of the tribals. And we should at least thank her for that.

Come on Robbies..who is not looking about the tribals problem..the government offer unconditional talks to the Maoists..its them who rejected it..Do you really think they really care of the tribals..if they do they would have been accepted the talks..She only raises issues which will acceptable to the foreign audience,its nothing to do with her bleeding heart...you also know about her statement of 26/11..she is nothing other than an attention seeker...

 

[H2O3C4Nitrogen]

Unfortunately many people dont respect diverse POV which she has.. Ultimately shes backing for a non voilant soln. A war is disasterous for people and it impacts upon the society..!

 

[Iggy]

Unfortunately many people dont respect diverse POV which she has.. Ultimately shes backing for a non voilant soln. A war is disasterous for people and it impacts upon the society..!

Offcource non-violent solution is the best way..and government offered them that..but its them who rejected it and also what should you want to do??doing nothing while they are on a rampage killing innocent people and destroying public properties..If they want to change the situation they are most welcome to participate in general election..taking arms is not an answer..there are many struggles and protest in India which is sucessful in defeating MNC's and government with out taking arms..

 

[RobbieS]

Come on Robbies..who is not looking about the tribals problem..the government offer unconditional talks to the Maoists..its them who rejected it..Do you really think they really care of the tribals..if they do they would have been accepted the talks..She only raises issues which will acceptable to the foreign audience,its nothing to do with her bleeding heart...you also know about her statement of 26/11..she is nothing other than an attention seeker...

The govt. did indeed offer unconditional talks with the Maoists, but Maoists are only a part of the problem. The root of the problem is a lack of economic development and the abuse of tribal rights to land and livelihood. I dont want to talk like a Jholawalha but untill and unless the govt doesn't amend the forest acts and enforces stricter control and regulations over the mining companies, things wont get better. These people are poor, uneducated and without access to the forests they called home for hundreds of years. We have to restore their rights.

And the Maoists can be eliminated militarily. They would be no match for a coordinated armed offensive but the deeper malaise of the ill-treatment of the tribals would remain.

And again, I am not a big fan of Arundhati Roy. As I said she's too hyperbolic at times and seems to use controversial statements to garner attention. But sometimes such people are required to remind us of our problems and shortfalls.

 

[Iggy]

The govt. did indeed offer unconditional talks with the Maoists, but Maoists are only a part of the problem. The root of the problem is a lack of economic development and the abuse of tribal rights to land and livelihood. I dont want to talk like a Jholawalha but untill and unless the govt doesn't amend the forest acts and enforces stricter control and regulations over the mining companies, things wont get better. These people are poor, uneducated and without access to the forests they called home for hundreds of years. We have to restore their rights.

And the Maoists can be eliminated militarily. They would be no match for a coordinated armed offensive but the deeper malaise of the ill-treatment of the tribals would remain.

And again, I am not a big fan of Arundhati Roy. As I said she's too hyperbolic at times and seems to use controversial statements to garner attention. But sometimes such people are required to remind us of our problems and shortfalls.

Robbies i understand and government knows it too..thats why they pledged economic devalopment along with police action against maoists..but for now government cant do anything for the welfare of the people there,because maoists are abducting and killing welfare and RDO officers and other government officials posted in that place..many people afraid to go to that places now..Inshort maoists dont want anything good happen to this people..other wise their support will be gone..once the movement is crushed hope there should be some welfare works done for this people..