Areesh
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2010
- Messages
- 45,157
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
You are taking it to a new high....
Believe me,India wasn't in the picture
Even this article proves that....
The Muslim generals of the Maharaja didn't wanted that the Maharaja should accede J&K to India but they failed to notice that Maharaja had other intentions .....maybe to rule the place for a longer period......
It is also mentioned that Maharaja acceded to India under pressure which indicates there was never a plan to accede to India....
and where did you get the idea that he would have massacred his own people....
India sure wouldn't have wanted Pakistan to get an hold on Kashmir but an independent Kashmir was very much in the table
Independent Kashmir was never a possibility since each and every state had to join Pakistan or Kashmir as per partition plan. As for India. It was always in the picture. If India wouldn't be in the picture, it wouldn't have sent it forces to Srinagar even before signing of the accession by the Hindu Raja. This shows desperation and real intent of Indian state. India always wanted to occupy whole of Kashmir and doing nothing would have been the biggest blunder by Pakistan. Fortunately Pakistan despite opposition by that idiot General Gracie acted quickly and secured areas of GB and AJK or else it would have been no GB And Ajk for Pakistan and no border with China. We saved GB and AJK from hands of Hindu raja.
As for from where we get the idea that he would massacre his own people. We got the idea since he was already massacring his own people and changed the demographics of Jammu region even before any tribal set his foot in the Kashmir region. So our doubts and apprehensions towards both Hindu raja and Hindu India were 101% justified.