What's new

Giant 3D Printer

cirr

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2012
Messages
17,049
Reaction score
18
Country
China
Location
China
Technicians are performing check-ups on a giant 3D printer in the laser additive manufacturing workshop of Beihang:

20140109rb01bRB1Cb002.jpg


飞机钛合金起落架可3D打印

An aircraft's key components such titanium alloy landing-gear and large main force-bearing frame can be printed as one piece。

Using the technology,the 3D-printing team at Beihang has recently been able to fabricate a multitude of complex titanium alloy structures,including those used in nuclear power plants and onboard satellites and rockets。

Next application:submarine。:lol:
 
Last edited:
.
The quality control of our turbofan engine will also be quickly solved and the mass production will increase by a huge margin.
 
. . . . .
The quality control of our turbofan engine will also be quickly solved and the mass production will increase by a huge margin.

Lol, 3D printers are cost prohibitive for mass production.

Industrial 3D printers are a revolution in technology.

Wrong. This is most likely a tech-demonstrator which will never be utilised industry wide.
 
.
Lol, 3D printers are cost prohibitive for mass production.



Wrong. This is most likely a tech-demonstrator which will never be utilised industry wide.

3D printing is already used by the PLA to manufacture key components of fighter jets.
 
. .
3D printing is already used by the PLA to manufacture key components of fighter jets.

Doubt that.

Most likely used for quick replacement of parts which would otherwise take a long time to arrive from a factory or maybe the production has been stopped. That and components that are required in small volumes which would otherwise require a large, expensively tooled setup to manufacture. Unlikely to be mission critical.

That sounds very counter-intuitive. Care to explain?

Counter intuitive? How so? It's very, very intuitive.

To replace a factory, i.e mass produced items, one would need to install large numbers of industrial scale 3D printers. That would in itself require a huge amount of capex, which in turn would make the whole venture economically nonviable.

3D printers also have a problem with dimensional precision. Which makes quality control for large numbers of products an unenviable task. Then we have problems with finish and the actual material qualities of the product. Both of which are just terrible.

The bottom line is: Additive manufacturing (3d printers) is useful for rapid prototyping (i.e let's present a 3d version of our product design to the customer), or when you need to produce small quantities of a product.

We need to remember that in manufacturing, minimisation of production cost is the mantra, 3D printers does not answer that call.
 
. .
Doubt that.

Most likely used for quick replacement of parts which would otherwise take a long time to arrive from a factory or maybe the production has been stopped. That and components that are required in small volumes which would otherwise require a large, expensively tooled setup to manufacture. Unlikely to be mission critical.

You might doubt it, your just an Indian but we are Chinese. Don't ever compare your mediocrity to us. EVER.
There are already pictures that showed posted by Chinese members here proving it.
 
.
Doubt that.

Most likely used for quick replacement of parts which would otherwise take a long time to arrive from a factory or maybe the production has been stopped. That and components that are required in small volumes which would otherwise require a large, expensively tooled setup to manufacture. Unlikely to be mission critical.

3D printing offer production method that is impossible to be used by traditional method like welding. Becos the whole piece come without welding so it can be make with similar strength compare to a welded one but with weight reduction up to 40%.

So how can it be just a quick replacement? 3D printing already is in widespread used in PLAAF military aircraft production. Plus they save material unlike traditional method which you needs to cut out a single part from a big chunk of titanium before welding. Which is a reason why PLAAF J-11B airframe is able to achieve weight reduction and lifespan increase compare to Russian made Su-27 airframe without large extensive of using composite.
 
.
3D printing offer production method that is impossible to be used by traditional method like welding. Becos the whole piece come without welding so it can be make with similar strength compare to a welded one but with weight reduction up to 40%.

So how can it be just a quick replacement? 3D printing already is in widespread used in PLAAF military aircraft production. Plus they save material unlike traditional method which you needs to cut out a single part from a big chunk of titanium before welding. Which is a reason why PLAAF J-11B airframe is able to achieve weight reduction and lifespan increase compare to Russian made Su-27 airframe without large extensive of using composite.

He is Indian, they probably never ever seen it since they import everything :lol:
Backward people.

3D printing is massive in China. And its well known many parts for fighters jets have been produced using 3D printing in China and confirmed by the PLA.
 
.
3D printing offer production method that is impossible to be used by traditional method like welding. Becos the whole piece come without welding so it can be make with similar strength compare to a welded one but with weight reduction up to 40%.

So how can it be just a quick replacement? 3D printing already is in widespread used in PLAAF military aircraft production. Plus they save material unlike traditional method which you needs to cut out a single part from a big chunk of titanium before welding. Which is a reason why PLAAF J-11B airframe is able to achieve weight reduction and lifespan increase compare to Russian made Su-27 airframe without large extensive of using composite.

I understand what you're saying. 3D printing does have it's benefits.But the simple fact that additive manufacturing works with layers of material and therefore it is not known for the material properties it imparts on the products.

What I'm trying to say is, the parts you mention are likely highly specialized and relatively small. I.O.W not suitable for large scale manufacturing.

You might doubt it, your just an Indian but we are Chinese. Don't ever compare your mediocrity to us. EVER.
There are already pictures that showed posted by Chinese members here proving it.

Okay :)
 
.
Back
Top Bottom