GHQ Puppet Justice Qazi Faez Isa Thinks Voting Is “Not A Fundamental Right”.

[White and Green with M/S]

PTI came to power with the help of the Pakistani military but then back stabbed our own military by being in bed with the Taliban, TTP & India.

The only reason IK is not dead like ZAB is because IK has strong jewish lobby behind him.

Lol show me the proofs that he was in the side with India lol

Your beloved ganja behkari aka Nawaz Sharif has business relationships with India and you forget modi was come to Pakistan (Lahore) in his term

 

[Neelo]

He’s on ignore now and trying to harass me through Private Messages LMFAO.

 

[Puffin]

He is remarkably intelligent.

 

[Dalit]

He is remarkably intelligent.

Teri maa ki phuddi Hindu madarchod.

 

[Paitoo]

A lot of educated elites in the subcontinent actually believe that democracy is BS. Take away an unbiased media, bring in a pliant law enforcement agency, and many such elites will happily welcome destruction of democracy.

 

[Cash GK]

In my book, PTI will always remain an anti-Pakistani terror organization that is in bed with Taliban and India.

I can stand inefficiency and corruption but never traitors and backstabbers like PTI.

Oky dale

 

[Neelo]

Well, he is speaking as a jurist. Anybody can read the Constitution and confirm what he said.

Oh BS….he’s speaking as a GHQ puppet and trying to undermine democracy because that what his handlers are paying him to do. Only a fool wouldn’t understand that.

Voting in a country where democracy is maturing (refused to allow to mature) is extremely important and saying things like this is incredibly irresponsible unless he has an agenda.

We all know what that agenda is.

 

[epebble]

A lot of educated elites in the subcontinent actually believe that democracy is BS. Take away an unbiased media, bring in a pliant law enforcement agency, and many such elites will happily welcome destruction of democracy.

Subcontinentals may be secretly salivating over China. At some point, basic necessities of life may look attractive compared to abstractions like democracy or liberty. Let's do a thought experiment: temporarily erase the border between China and the Subcontinent. No immigration control, nothing at all. Which way would be the flow of people? Towards democracy or away from democracy?

 

[muhammadhafeezmalik]

The tattay chuk campaign on full swing right now in the liberal and elitist circles of Pakistan is so funny to see, especially on Twitter.

He had his wife stand with him, woman registrar, bla bla bla, maverick..

The only thing that matters is how well he upholds he rule of law in his judiciary, and prevents the likes of ADSJ Dilawar making sham judgements, getting people (not only the PTI women, but everyone) justice, and making sure police doesn't have the ability to just pick up anyone even after 12 bails.

Jab Bajwa aya tha tab bhi yehi sab log tattay chuk rahay thay us kay, Bajwa doctrine and he was like the second coming of Alexander the Great.

We are such a pathetic group of short sighted, selfish people.

Sir,

Don't mock him, at least he is our President:

 

[epebble]

Oh BS….he’s speaking as a GHQ puppet and trying to undermine democracy because that what his handlers are paying him to do. Only a fool wouldn’t understand that.

Voting in a country where democracy is maturing (refused to allow to mature) is extremely important and saying things like this is incredibly irresponsible unless he has an agenda.

We all know what that agenda is.

Unfortunately, legal language is not 'user friendly'. If the Supreme court Chief Justice believes voting is a fundamental right, he has to order the government to hold elections to allow voting. Because the job of a Supreme court is to defend fundamental rights. No court in any democracy orders the government to hold elections. It is normally considered the duty of the government (i.e., the executive). Judiciary is generally reluctant to insert itself into conducting elections unless there is a dispute to be resolved.

 

[Paitoo]

Subcontinentals may be secretly salivating over China. At some point, basic necessities of life may look attractive compared to abstractions like democracy or liberty. Let's do a thought experiment: temporarily erase the border between China and the Subcontinent. No immigration control, nothing at all. Which way would be the flow of people? Towards democracy or away from democracy?

True, but while China may not be a democracy, it is not a plutocracy either. China can, and does crack down on its billionaires, for whatever reason. The subcontinent elites are money hungry, and dislike the fact that people from the lower strata want some say in decision making too. It's not about which economic ideology you support. It's about 'keeping people in their place', an attitude that stems from historical divisions.

 

[epebble]

True, but while China may not be a democracy, it is not a plutocracy either. China can, and does crack down on its billionaires, for whatever reason. The subcontinent elites are money hungry, and dislike the fact that people from the lower strata want some say in decision making too. It's not about which economic ideology you support. It's about 'keeping people in their place', an attitude that stems from historical divisions.

Many developing countries show class or other social structures that tend to wither away when economic growth improves. USSR, China, USA, U.K. all had strong social strata early in their development and now look much more 'class less'.

 

[TriptiD]

I am not sure what the fuss is about. The right to vote is not a fundamental right in most democracies. Even in the US, if you are in jail for a felony, you cannot vote in most states.

 

[Goritoes]

You have right to vote only if you offer Fajr ki Namaz.

 

[epebble]

I am not sure what the fuss is about. The right to vote is not a fundamental right in most democracies. Even in the US, if you are in jail for a felony, you cannot vote in most states.

It is a common belief among many people that all good things should become 'Rights'. There are activists who demand Right to vote, Right to education, Right to be healthy, Right to be not hungry, Right to be safe etc. Enumerating each of this as a Right means the Supreme court has to be scaled up a hundred-fold to defend the government from all the violation of 'Rights'. So, let's make health as a right, then a sick person can sue the government if he can't afford a treatment even though he smoked cigarettes all his life. A hungry person can sue because his pantry is empty because he ran out of money at month end due to poor budgeting. So, the entire government becomes a giant creche.