What's new

Ghaggar-Hakra believed to be mythical Rig Veda Sarasvati river proven false

Yeah and RigVeda is a Pakistani text. Please, dont make this into a Indo Pak contest. This is about history. A History that both share.
Pakistan created the first civilization of the sub continent.

We traded with Mesopotamia and Ancient Egypt whilst Indians were running around in jungles naked.

Indian revisionist historians have always tried to call our civilization theirs, nothing to do with you. Your civilization came much later on.

I guess we had to teach you how to live like normal humans.
 
.
Yeah and RigVeda is a Pakistani text. Please, dont make this into a Indo Pak contest. This is about history. A History that both share.

Their main problem is the Hindu connection of their history. Few months back some of them were desperate to prove that Taxila University had no Hindu connection. :lol:
 
.
@Nassr Look at the map, look at the upper part of Saraswati, its between Yamuna and Sutlej as mentioned in Rigveda.

You are wrong, Mesopotamia traded with our ancestors from the coast of Gujarat. There was no port of time of Indus valley civilization on the delta of Indus river. ;)

We the people of Meluhha (Pakistan) traded with Mesopotamia and not the Mesopotamians as they never traveled here for trade - no archeological and historical data exists to support it.

And Gujarat was part of IVC landmass not Ganjetic plains where large majority of you guys come from.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Not all of them say that. But yes, since Pakistan Studies is in their curricula, I don't blame them. It's not their fault entirely.
Besides its not only Hindu history. But an entire Dharmic history that is overlooked. But the evidences remain. One day they will come to know about it too. :)
Their main problem is the Hindu connection of their history. Few months some of them were desperate to prove that Taxila University had no Hindu connection. :lol:
 
.
Their main problem is the Hindu connection of their history. Few months back some of them were desperate to prove that Taxila University had no Hindu connection. :lol:

Not true at all. There was no connection between the IVC and any Vedic or Hindu related culture as all that was a later evolution. However, we were initially monotheists, later Hindus, Buddhists and are now Muslim.
 
.
Their main problem is the Hindu connection of their history. Few months back some of them were desperate to prove that Taxila University had no Hindu connection. :lol:

We don't deny it, how can you deny history.

What we deny is your version of history.

Pakistan were one of the first monotheists in the world.

Near the end of the Indus civilization, Indians invaded us and converted us to Hindu polytheists.

That is why we reverted (NOT CONVERTED) back to monotheism.
 
.
We the people of Meluhha (Pakistan) traded with Mesopotamia and not the Mesopotamians as they never traveled here for trade - no archeological and historical data exists to support it.

And Gujarat was part of IVC landmass not Ganjetic plains where large majority of you guys come from.

The main port of Meluhha was in Gujarat, not in Pakistan. The Maluhha was the term for the nation of people arriving from Gujarat coast to trade with Mesopotamia.

I just wonder why don't Indus river's delta have any ancient remains of a seaport to trade with Mesopotamia.
 
. . .
Pakistan created the first civilization of the sub continent.

We traded with Mesopotamia and Ancient Egypt whilst Indians were running around in jungles naked.

Indian revisionist historians have always tried to call our civilization theirs, nothing to do with you. Your civilization came much later on.

I guess we had to teach you how to live like normal humans.

First of all you dnt have any history ... their in no pakistan before 1947 .... to history kaha se aayi??
 
. .
The main port of Meluhha was in Gujarat, not in Pakistan. The Maluhha was the term for the nation of people arriving from Gujarat coast to trade with Mesopotamia.

I just wonder why don't Indus river's delta have any ancient remains of a seaport to trade with Mesopotamia.

Trade with Mesopotamia was carried out from many places along the coast including Lothal, and yet most of these places are located along the coast of Pakistan, north of Karachi.

Remember, Gujarat and Lothal was part of Meluhhan landmass and not Ganjetic plains.
 
.
The main port of Meluhha was in Gujarat, not in Pakistan. The Maluhha was the term for the nation of people arriving from Gujarat coast to trade with Mesopotamia.

I just wonder why don't Indus river's delta have any ancient remains of a seaport to trade with Mesopotamia.


Its not your fault the Pakistani civilization was so influential it held territories in India. Afterall you guys were just jungle dwellers at that time.

We also had chunks of Afghanistan and Iran.

Where was the currency of the Meluhhians made?
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom