Goody, goody, gumdrops!
At last! A scholar who can understand me, and put up scholarly words in refutation!
This is an exception, and is not scholarly. In fact, it is stupid.
Here is Herodotus:
Dr. M. Aurel Stein (in his memoir on Maps Illustrating the Ancient Geography of Kashmir, 1899), identifies the land of Paktyike with the territory of Gandhara, the present Peshawar district. While thinking it unlikely that the exact site of Paktyike will ever be identified, he suggests that the expedition of Scylax may have started from some point near Jahangira, a place on the Kqbul River some six miles distant from its junction with the Indus.
Paktyice is probably represented by the ethnic name Pakhtun or the Indian Pathan.
Probably because you forgot how you started this discussion on the antiquity of the name* India. Or perhaps because you wanted to draw attention away from some other silly person, not a scholar of your sort, who talked glibly and easily about India being a British invention for their conquered territory.
From the examples here and two posts after, you should really take up this quest on an urgent basis.
For helpful hints, please read The Frogs, by Aristophanes.
I thought you would give better references than quoting Herodotus on location of India. The description of Herodotus with regard to exact location of India has been pronounced by most historians as highly suspect as it is believed that amongst other aspects, he also mistook River Kabul as River Indus. Though he also wrote many more interesting things about India and its tribes, one of the most intriguing being the ants as big as dogs that were found in the desert that you mention, but that for later.
With regard to Caspatyrus:
The two chief opinions are, that Caspatyrus is Cabul, and again, that it is Kashmir. On the whole, the latter seems most probable, but certainty seems almost unattainable. The Sanscrit name of Kashmir is Kasyapa pur, which, condensed to Kaspapur, gives us the form found in Hecataeus; and further, the very similar name CASPEIRIA certainly designates the country of Kashmir. As to the expedition of Scylax, remembering that the true source of the Indus in Tibet was unknown to the ancients, and therefore that the voyage must have commenced near the source of one of the chief tributaries, assuredly no better starting point could be found than the Jelum, at the lake formed by it below Kashmir. The eastward course of the voyage is the great difficulty. (Heeren, Ideen, vol. i. pt. i. p. 371; Ritter, Erdkunde, vol. iii. pp. 1087, foll.; Bohlen, Alte Indien, vol. i. p. 64 ; Schlegel, Berlin Taschenbuch, 1829, p. 17; Von Hammer, Annal. Vien. vol. li. p. 36; Bähr, Excurs. ad Herod. 3.102; Mannert, Geogr. d. Griech. u. Röm. vol. v. pt. i. pp. 7, foll.; Forbiger, Alte Geogr. vol. ii. p. 511.)
Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography (1854), CASPATYRUS
Interstingly:
Dmitri Panchenkoon the other hand, has argued persuasively, on the basis of apparent references to Scylax's work in the late Greek author Philostratos, that Scylax in fact travelled across North India, made his way down the Ganges, and arrived at Taprobane (Sri Lanka).
Scylax of Caryanda - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
With regard to the country of Pactyice, the Imperial Gazetteer of India, v. 5, p. 34, indicates Paktyike as the Pashtu country, a term used by Herodotus for Arachosia. Encyclopædia Iranica states that, the inhabitants of Arachosia were Iranian peoples, referred to as Arachosians or Arachoti. Though, EJ Brill's first encyclopaedia of Islam states that, they were called Paktyans by ethnicity, and that name survives until today in the form of ethnic Pashtun tribes.
And more importantly, a more accurate account of how Greeks viewed Indias location has been given here along with a map:
From the accounts of the Greeks it would appear that the ancient Indians had a very accurate knowledge of the true shape and size of their country. According to Strabo, Alexander caused the whole country to be described by men well acquainted with it;" and this account was afterwards lent to Patrokles by Xenokles, the treasurer of the Syrian kings. Patrokles himself held the government of the north-east satrapies of the Syrian empire under Seleukus Nikator and Antiochus Soter, and the information which he collected regarding India and the Eastern provinces, has received the approbation of Eratosthenes and Strabo for its accuracy. Another account of India was derived from the register of the Stathimi, or "Marches" from place to place, which was prepared by the Macedonian Amyntas, and which was confirmed by the testimony of Megasthenes, who had actually visited Palibotlira (Patna) as the ambassador of Seleukus Nikator.
On the authority of these documents, Eratosthenes and other writers have described India as a rhomhoid, or unequal quadrilateral, in shape, with the Indus on the west, the mountains on the north, and the sea on the east and south.
The Ancient Geography of India by Major General Alexander Cunningham, Royal Engineers, TEUBNER AND CO. PATERNOSTER ROW. 1871.
And please Joe, stop bickering like an old Anglo-Indian aunty. It is not your fault though, it happens when people of your caliber get involved in serious discussions with the likes of Bang Galores of this world. And stop eating chocolate as this wont help your heart much in addition to the use of goody goody gumdrops. But then these young ones accuse the oldies of acting like children, dont they!
And for your information, I had great regard for my principal as he was a great scholar of his time, even though he was not of South Asian descent. And it was a shame that you spoke about him in the manner that you did.
I suggest that you need to read The Frogs again, though not during the rainy season, for you may get distracted by hearing the noises that enchanted Arundhati Roy in her award winning novel.