What's new

Get ready to welcome the Kid on the block

.
Perhaps thats because Japan is a democracy....and whoever would have their fingers on the N-button would be held accountable to his actions and subsequent retaliation by the people....whereas the aforementioned countries all have bigoted / unstable leaders like Kim Jong...or the Myanmarese junta or the Iranian spiritual leaders for whom the deaths of millions of human beings can be justified and in whose dictionaries the word " restraint " does not exist.....

.....responsibility comes before power.....

I think its more appropriate to say stable countries as opposed to democratic countries are more suited to possess WMD's, ultimately the people don't actually decide how the weapons are used and by the time its used it will be too late for anyone to be held accountable.
 
.
and thank god u r also not in charge,u can protect an dictator ruled NK to threaten japan but feels threatened when japan do the same,by the way dont think about war so much,even if u win that will have undesirable effects both on ur military and economy,i dont think china should go for it this time,and by the way their is a lot of nation's to back Japan,how many partner's u have

I r not in charge so how can you blame me for protecting NK? You do not make logical sense.

and it's you not 'u' and it's are not 'r' if you can't be bothered to type words out in full, I can't be bothered to read what you write in the future.
 
.
well if u ask me i dont support nukes for any nation,if a disarmament is done that should b more every nation

no nation is at a particularly high moral ground to deny other's when they themselves keep weapons intended for such destruction especially U.S the only nation which had used it
 
.
Bad idea, very bad idea. Let us look at Japan's neighbors right now: China, the Two Koreas, and Russia. Which one supports a nuclear armed Japan?
 
.
Thank god you're not in charge. China would never tolerate a nuclear armed Japan. There would be war before that happens and given how much the Japanese economy is dependent on China it would be economic suicide as well.

No, I wont reply to you in that sarcastic tone. :)

What you have said is about China's stand in case japan goes nuclear.yes china might not be able to tolerate japan to have nuclear weapons, but so long japan has been tolerating you inspite of you having nuclear wepaons.whats the new threat for china if they go nuclear ??

BTW my post was about the most likely scenario of japan developing nukes...not that Its my personal wish for japan to go nuclear.
 
.
All depends on how Japan's concerns on NK are addressed.

Upto the Americans on how they take this one forward.
 
.
No, I wont reply to you in that sarcastic tone. :)

What you have said is about China's stand in case japan goes nuclear.yes china might not be able to tolerate japan to have nuclear weapons, but so long japan has been tolerating you inspite of you having nuclear wepaons.whats the new threat for china if they go nuclear ??

BTW my post was about the most likely scenario of japan developing nukes...not that Its my personal wish for japan to go nuclear.

You don't get it do you? Despite the moral overtones of the initial posts about who has the "right" to nuclear arms, such things play no consideration into what the situation on the ground is.
 
.
You don't get it do you? Despite the moral overtones of the initial posts about who has the "right" to nuclear arms, such things play no consideration into what the situation on the ground is.

are we on the same page :confused: ?? ok let me keep it simple.

meat of my 1st post was to say that japan would most likely develop the nukes and the second post that whats the new threat for China if japan develops nukes ? since you re talking about China not tolerating Japan if they develop nukes and there will be a war.

now whats your say ??
 
.
You say Japan will develop nuclear weapons because of the fisherman incident. That is pretty much enough for me to make a judgement on your grasp of things.
 
.
You say Japan will develop nuclear weapons because of the fisherman incident. That is pretty much enough for me to make a judgement on your grasp of things.


yeah..especially the fisherman incident...and are you saying Japan wont do so !! :what: well, then I guess we'll have a lot to discuss after few developments in Japan.
 
.
Democracy hah? what an excuse. Let everybody have the nukes who can have it, every country need to have it to defend themselves be it a democratic or non democratic, it is vital for everyone. Nobody is responsible or irresponsible if they have the nukes. if you have it then you will use it if you see the need, simple as that. America is a democracy, but they still nuked japan to stone age.

You really don't want a safe world do you? Well then
Why stop at countries? Lets allow them to any non-state group as well! Let Israeli settlers, Al-qaeda operatives, Northern alliance figures, Chechen seperatists, The Irish Republican army, and Falun-gong alike have access to them!
 
. . .
You really don't want a safe world do you? Well then
Why stop at countries? Lets allow them to any non-state group as well! Let Israeli settlers, Al-qaeda operatives, Northern alliance figures, Chechen seperatists, The Irish Republican army, and Falun-gong alike have access to them!

Yes, let everybody have it, not the organizations, but the countries, the settlers have already had it(israeli gov). why should only a few countries have it to bully the rest of the world? let all people have it, that will probably make everybody think to put an stop to the nukes for every single country.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom