What's new

Germany: Syrian Hairdresser Hailed As ‘Model of Integration’ Slits His Female Employer’s Throat

zen master

BANNED
Joined
May 10, 2017
Messages
123
Reaction score
-6
Country
India
Location
India
Mohammad Hussain Rashwani was hailed in the media as the “paramount example of successful integration” after he got a job as a hairdresser at a salon in Herzberg, Germany in late 2015.

After a little over a year on the job, he decided to slit his female employer’s throat.

From Lausitzer Rundschau as translated by Gates of Vienna:


“For me there weren’t any signs that I could see”

Herzberg’s hairdresser speaks about the knife attack by her Syrian employee

Herzberg’s master hairdresser talks about what is motivating her these days since the attack by her Syrian employee two weeks ago.

Should she have seen this attack against her coming? She keeps asking herself this question over and over. And she can’t find an answer. “Even today, I do not know what I should think. Until that Wednesday evening, he was an endearing man. I believed up to the very last minute that something good could come of him because I appreciated his professional abilities very much,” Ilona F. says.

DDgDRoiWAAQ3ije.jpg


The Herzberg woman doesn’t want to talk about the attack itself; her thoughts are much more circling around ‘why’ again and again. “Did I intervene too much? Was I too strong for him? Did we, my husband and I, organize too much for him?” These and other thoughts are constantly crossing her mind. But there weren’t any signs that the Damascus-born Syrian maybe had other plans. His mother, which whom Ilona F. was in contact, had repeatedly written how grateful her son was for the chance that he received and how much he had respected the “she-boss”. “He even assured my husband and me personally of this.”

Yet still, something had to have happened to him that made him commit this terrible bloody deed. “For me, there were no signs that something like this could happen,” the 64-year-old says, looking back. But, she admits, he had changed considerably in the past few months. Ilona F. explains: “We had invested a lot of time in him after our spectacular beginnings, and we had helped him in every way possible. We had plans. He is an outstanding hairdresser. The customers were super-happy with his work. Until the very last minute I had believed that things were going to work.”

Even then changes started to set in. He, a Muslim who until now did not seem in any way a devout believer, had began to talk about Allah more and more. This certainly got on her nerves for over time. He also quit visiting the hairdresser and her husband at home. Before the changes he came by almost every day. They had talked about everything, professional and private. But he had begun to neglect his study of the German language more and more. “He kept assuring me that he wanted to learn the language, but later. More and more he said later this, later that, when we talked about his future,” the businesswoman recounts.

And then there were also problems in the salon. Mohammad H. came to work too late more often; he didn’t take time very seriously. He became very reluctant to drive to work at Schönewalde, where his boss owned a second hair salon. And during the week the attack took place, he outright refused to go.

After a disagreement in the Herzberg salon, when a customer was unhappy with the work of the Syrian hairdresser, she had given him notice that they had to talk. “I knew it couldn’t go on like this. But immediately the question arose in my mind, what would become of him if I were to throw him out. After all, I still believed in him.”

That this by now was a fatal mistake is something the Herzberg woman is only slowly beginning to realize. “That I could have been so wrong in my judgment of another person,” she shakes her head. “Actually, I feel really sorry for him.”

But she is increasingly pleased at how much sympathy has been pouring in over the past two weeks from “almost complete strangers that I didn’t even know.” Among them even Syrians. They brought her flowers and in a letter had apologized for the attack that their countryman had committed and they distanced themselves from it [translator’s note: according to her, they distanced themselves from the deed, but not from the attacker, at least that’s how I read this].

“I don’t hate Syrians,” Ilona F. says. “Integration could have worked, especially considering all the support he received.” As far as health is concerned, she’s still mending, she says. “It’s all still just too much trouble for me right now,” she says and hopes for greater peace.

https://www.infowars.com/germany-sy...ntegration-slits-his-female-employers-throat/

elsewhere in Germany:

image.jpg


“For personnel reasons, we cannot serve women customers,” the hand-written notice read. “In this period we will have a Syrian barber in the salon who only serves men. Many thanks for your understanding.”
 
Why work so hard to dig out articles ........ when you can man up and say it to 1 billion at their faces "I hate Islam".

After all that is the very reason for this article isn't it.

@padamchen keep your sanghis in check buddy ....... remember I told you the day they try exposing themselves to the full .... would be the day when sh*t hits the fan for them. Cow related lynching is fine as long as its within the boundaries of india and the person getting killed is some peasant meager indian Muslim .... but wandering outside poking nose where it doesn't belong well ........ its not a good idea.
 
Why work so hard to dig out articles ........ when you can man up and say it to 1 billion at their faces "I hate Islam".

After all that is the very reason for this article isn't it.

@padamchen keep your sanghis in check buddy ....... remember I told you the day they try exposing themselves to the full .... would be the day when sh*t hits the fan for them. Cow related lynching is fine as long as its within the boundaries of india and the person getting killed is some peasant meager indian Muslim .... but wandering outside poking nose where it doesn't belong well ........ its not a good idea.

I am not their keeper buddy. Please deal with them as you would.

I do. :lol:

Personally, I have nothing against anyone disliking even hating a faith or ideology. They may or may not have their reasons. That is their burden to bear.

My issue has always been (and I think I can speak about my views towards both militant Islam as well as militant Hindutva) dislike even hatred of disloyalty, of bullies, of unfairness, of intolerance and bigotry, and of hitting and picking on the innocent and underdogs.

Cheers, Doc
 
I am not their keeper buddy. Please deal with them as you would.

I do. :lol:

Personally, I have nothing against anyone disliking even hating a faith or ideology. They may or may not have their reasons. That is their burden to bear.

My issue has always been (and I think I can speak about my views towards both militant Islam as well as militant Hindutva) dislike even hatred of disloyalty, of bullies, of unfairness, of intolerance and bigotry, and of hitting and picking on the innocent and underdogs.

Cheers, Doc

You are keen promoter of indian unity and indian people ........ I would be very cautious if some idiot tries poking people from a distant disturbed region with a faith which 200 million plus indians follow. Don't invite something which you can't handle. Your khaki chaddi wearing lathi wielding sanghis are no match for them ...... so keep this hatred within india ..... militants from Hindutva don't stand a chance if it starts.
 
You are keen promoter of indian unity and indian people ........ I would be very cautious if some idiot tries poking people from a distant disturbed region with a faith which 200 million plus indians follow. Don't invite something which you can't handle. Your khaki chaddi wearing lathi wielding sanghis are no match for them ...... so keep this hatred within india ..... militants from Hindutva don't stand a chance if it starts.

For the most part, they just about match and dominate the 200 million within.

But I guess everyone knows that.

An army is one thing. A civilian populace another.

Why do you think all this has started only when the BJP came to power?

After all, if one was so strong and brave, one should have been fingering the Muslims regardless of party in power.

Isn't that too obvious even to Pakistanis?

Cheers, Doc
 
For the most part, they just about match and dominate the 200 million within.

But I guess everyone knows that.

An army is one thing. A civilian populace another.

Why do you think all this has started only when the BJP came to power?

After all, if one was so strong and brave, one should have been fingering the Muslims regardless of party in power.

Isn't that too obvious even to Pakistanis?

Cheers, Doc

It is very much obvious and frankly conveyed on many occasions, salay 30 gori chamri walo nay pooray subcontinent ko ghulam bana lia tha aur aik b mai ka lal in may say nai khara hua tha ......... their dominance of 200 million should be treated as the highest achievement .......... because beyond that their weak meager hearts won't be able to take it for more than one day. That is all I wanted to say. Otherwise why would I care.
 
It is very much obvious and frankly conveyed on many occasions, salay 30 gori chamri walo nay pooray subcontinent ko ghulam bana lia tha aur aik b mai ka lal in may say nai khara hua tha ......... their dominance of 200 million should be treated as the highest achievement .......... because beyond that their weak meager hearts won't be able to take it for more than one day. That is all I wanted to say. Otherwise why would I care.

I have nothing against Hindus. Or Muslims. Who are nice people. Secure. Big hearted. Non fingering.

The latest minority bad mouthed by sanghis is the Parsis.

Selling opium to the Chinese (so????). Making money under the Brits (so????). Being affluent and private as a community, not wishing to mix bloodlines (so????).

The Parsis came here 1357 years ago. Not yesterday. They've fought and bled on and for this soil like any other Indian.

The final frustrated dig of the sanghis is about them coming here for refuge. Tails between their legs. Running from "Muslims"

Jokers forget after the very early Arabian invaders, which were the bloodlines that conquered them and ruled their land. Who conquered continents till Europe and held sway for 3000 years. THE military superpower of the ancient world. Matched only by the Greeks and Romans.

Bloodlines and faith. The line often blurs for them.

Because honestly, as a race they're frogs in a giant well. Never moved out of their ancestral land. Conquered foreign lands or peoples.

So in their mind, Indian = Hindu.

This needed to be said.

Cheers, Doc
 
I have nothing against Hindus. Or Muslims. Who are nice people. Secure. Big hearted. Non fingering.

The latest minority bad mouthed by sanghis is the Parsis.

Selling opium to the Chinese (so????). Making money under the Brits (so????). Being affluent and private as a community, not wishing to mix bloodlines (so????).

The Parsis came here 1357 years ago. Not yesterday. They've fought and bled on and for this soil like any other Indian.

The final frustrated dig of the sanghis is about them coming here for refuge. Tails between their legs. Running from "Muslims"

Jokers forget after the very early Arabian invaders, which were the bloodlines that conquered them and ruled their land. Who conquered continents till Europe and held sway for 3000 years. THE military superpower of the ancient world. Matched only by the Greeks and Romans.

Bloodlines and faith. The line often blurs for them.

Because honestly, as a race they're frogs in a giant well. Never moved out of their ancestral land. Conquered foreign lands or peoples.

So in their mind, Indian = Hindu.

This needed to be said.

Cheers, Doc
People's of sub- Continent don't have dauntless temper, though Tribes in India and Pakistan have doughty nature but there numbers is so small that fails to make any difference.The day from human inhabitation started in Sub-Continent there haven't been single recorded event,in which we ever tried to vanture into foreign land,send an expedition,
Australia sitting next to us was contacted and conqured by Europeans.
Believe it or not we gain maturity by reading and travelling, and for most part of our existence people's of Sub-Continent have never done it.For our ancestors life Earth ended in mountains near Kabul in West and Thick South Asian jungles in Burma.
We never tried to contact Persians or Hans.
With so little exposure to outer world,we were just living in well for past thousands of years, change only came with technology.

Arabs, Persians, Afghans on other hand were all dauntless people's,for them exploration and venture into unknown lands was never something to angst.
 
Last edited:
People's of sub- Continent don't have dauntless temper, though Tribes in India and Pakistan have doughty nature but there numbers is so small that fails to make any difference.The day from human inhabitation started in Sub-Continent there haven't been single recorded event,in which we ever tried to vanture into foreign land,send an expedition,
sitting next to us was contacted by Europeans.
Believe it or not we gain maturity by reading and travelling, and for most part of our existence people's of Sub-Continent have never done it.For our ancestors life Earth ended in mountains near Kabul in West and Thick South Asian jungles in Burma.
We never tried to contact Persians or Hans.
With so little exposure to outer world,we were just living in well for past thousands of years, change only came with technology.

Arabs, Persians, Afghans on other hand were all dauntless people's,for them exploration and venture into unknown lands was never something to angst.

Absolutely correct.

And there is a reason for that. India (Pakistan and everything else included - I mean the geographical historical construct) was always blessed. The land of rivers. Fertile alluvial plains. Hills. Forests. Thousands of kilometers of coastline (but almost zero seafaring tradition surprisingly).

They never really needed to move out or look elsewhere.

And science and arts and knowledge flourished. Some travelers moved out and came back. Lots of foreigners came in. Some stayed.

Trade was always there. So its not as if the Indian race did not know of what lay beyond the mountains. They simply did not care or need to.

The only time they cared is when armies marched across and in on them. Battle hardened forces. Fact. Mobile. Heavily armored. Heavily armed. Advanced tactics. Cavalry. Light cannon. Heavier swords. Lances. The ability to shoot off horseback.

None of this was part of the Indian war-fighting culture. And more often than not they were overrun.

That's simply the long and short of it.

What India always has had going for it is three things. The mountains. Size. And numbers.

Eventually all invading armies tire. Return. Move on. Get absorbed. And stay on. One or some or all of the above.

Cheers, Doc
 
Last edited:
Absolutely correct.

And there is a reason for that. India (Pakistan and everything else included - I mean the geographical historical construct) was always blessed. The land of rivers. Fertile alluvial plains. Hills. Forests. Thousands of kilometers of coastline (but almost zero seafaring tradition surprisingly).

They never really needed to move out or look elsewhere.

And science and arts and knowledge flourished. Some travelers moved out and came back. Lots of foreigners came in. Some stayed.

Trade was always there. So its not as if the Indian race did not know of what lay beyond the mountains. They simply did not care or need to.

The only time they cared is when armies marched across and in on them. Battle hardened forces. Fact. Mobile. Heavily armored. Heavily armed. Advanced tactics. Cavalry. Light cannon. Heavier swords. Lances. The ability to shoot off horseback.

None of this was part of the Indian war-fighting culture. And more often than not they were overrun.

That's simply the long and short of it.

What India always has had going for it is tree things. The mountains. Size. And numbers.

Eventually all invading armies tire. Return. Move on. Get absorbed. And stay on. One or some or all of the above.

Cheers, Doc
Well that's correct,with abundance of every resource,they never tried to move into foreign lands.Indeed it has absorbed every Invader, except Muslims.
 
except Muslims.

Well, we have 200 million of them. You have 200. Bangladesh has 160.

That's more than half a billion Muslims in a total population of 1.7 billion.

Pretty good "absorption". Considering 99.99% of the bloodlines are native Indic.

The ideology and religious bit of course is different. Which is because of two factors.

1) India never ever got invaded by a proselytizing religion in her history. That invaded and stayed on and took root. Islam was the first and only one. The British would probably eventually have come close, if they had been allowed to stay on and Christianity taken deeper roots.

2) Unlike Islam for the Persians that was based on similar worship of a monotheistic entity (Ahura Mazda getting replaced by Allah) and similar theological architecture (as for Judaism and Christianity before), Islam was totally anti-theistic to the Hindu way of life and theology.

There was therefore never going to be an option of adoption and smooth conversion. It was always going to be stark shades of black and white. No (zero) middle ground.

I believe that to a large extent was why Hindu India never totally converted to Islam. Where Zoroastrian Persia did.

Cheers, Doc
 
Last edited:
@padamchen

The inferiority complex and superstitious nature of indians had no role to play in not venturing out of india?
 
@padamchen

The inferiority complex and superstitious nature of indians had no role to play in not venturing out of india?
When you refer to "India" and "Indians", you mean historically ancient India (pre-partion and earlier), right ?

There is no space for expeditions like the brutal Islamic conquests of the past in the modern world,even the Americans/NATO/goras don't go around colonizing anymore.

back in the day the plentiful abundance of nature and all it provided ensured that there was hardly a reason for people to go explore beyond these shores (sarhad paar), and given their spiritual nature, much less a need for bloody conquest.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom