beckham
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2009
- Messages
- 1,170
- Reaction score
- 2
Who started the first world war ? Muslims ? Who started the second world war ? Muslims ? Who killed about 20 millions of Aborigines in Australia ? Muslims ?? Who sent the nuclear bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki ? Muslims ?? Who killed more than 100 millions of Indians in North America ? Muslims ?? Who killed more than 50 millions of Indians in south America ? Muslims ?? Who took about 180 millions of African people as slaves and 88% of them died and was thrown in Atlantic ocean ? Muslims ?? No , They weren't Muslims!!! First of all, You have to define terrorism properly... If a non-Muslim do something bad..it is crime. But if a Muslim commit same..he is terrorist... So first remove this double standard...then come to the point!!!
Got this message on Facebook but I am just posting this behalf of Facts and Figure not which sources, Newspaper, TV channel reported. Atleast i don't believe on every TV channel, News paper report.
About provided Facts ... is that wrong or right ?
One can see his ( if such a guy really exists) point ,but IMO the reason why Muslims get all the blame is because there isn't a particular nation or ethnic group that get takes or receives the blame for an incident.It all goes under the brand name of JIHAD or Islamic terror.
For instance, when Nazi's massacred Jews it was portrayed as Germans killing off the minority and not as Christians vs Jews. But when a guy from Nation X blows himself off in Europe, he isn't doing that (or representing) Nation X thereby it is assumed that it is for his religion.And that makes Muslims from other parts of the world also look bad.
It is human nature to find a pattern, the only pattern for several terror incidents seems to be religion.The problem wouldn't have arisen if the terror groups had capitalized on nationalism or ethnicity than on religion.Its just my personal view and if I have offended any one I would like to apologize in advance.