mike2000 is back
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2015
- Messages
- 8,513
- Reaction score
- 19
- Country
- Location
Puma armored vehicle reminds me of our very own BAEmulti purpose Armored vehicle(AMPV) used by US forces
BAE
BAE
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
die Deutsch-Französische Brigade
@Bundeswehr
@mike2000 is back I hope we could see a Franco-British brigade in the future!
I'm thinking of creating a British armed forces thread. I just noticed we don't even have one on here.
huh....??
Is that the Nansen class?
Yes it is, F310 is HNoMS Fridtjof Nansen of the same class name. Here she is hanging with a Russian Navy frigate:
Type-45 is bigger, can carry more VLS cells and has a better radar and a bigger gun.@mike2000 is back my bet is Sachsen class
View attachment 265348
FGS Karlsruhe
View attachment 265349
FGS Lübeck
View attachment 265350
remember after ww2 we cant have destroyers though Sachsen class by some is consider a destroyerType-45 is bigger, can carry more VLS cells and has a better radar and a bigger gun.
However, we cant really compare the two since Type 45 is far bigger(2000 tons heavier/bigger), so its not a fair comparison to be honest.
But overall, T45 has the PRINCIPAL ANTI-AIRCRAFT MISSILE SYSTEM (PAAMS) which is widely believed to be one of the best system available at the moment. It also has electric propulsion and a 7,000nm+ range.
Apart from those features I prefer the layout of the F124/sachsen, it can operate 2x helos and it's weapons are positioned better than on the T45. So Sachsen is a rather good ship as well.
True, but now i think you can. Since as you know its our leaders wo have been urging your leaders to arm more and play a bigger role in world/military issues and crisis, but your leaders so far have been the ones who have been reluctant to do this.remember after ww2 we cant have destroyers