The pictures of "child ****" were actually naked pics sent to him by girls who liked him. It's called sexting, and it isn't indicative of pedophilia. Now, it's true the pictures were of underaged girls, but Trayvon was underaged, too. Those are the girls he's going to be interested in.
Dude, don't try to find excuse in this desert. There's no excuse for it.
The guy should have deleted the pics the moment he received them. Or if you try to contend that he is himself a 'minor' (at 17), then tell me honestly, was he going to delete the pics when he turned 18? Bet your a$$ he wouldn't.
And where did I say that he produced child ****? Who cares who sent him where he got it from?
From your confidence, it seems only you know that secret that girls/boys sent him pics themselves without any solicitation as if he confided every secret in you!
Fact of matter is, wherever you get it from, storage of child **** tells less about the law and more about the character of the man - at 17, 6ft 4 inches, and beating the **** out of a 29 year old man, he was no child himself.
Take my advice, try not to defend him just for the heck of it, because you are blindly going so far that it speaks tons about your own character.
Oh, I have an interesting question for you -
That main culprit in the rape and murder of the Delhi girl who got raped on the bus was also 17. Would you also paint him with the same brush as you do Trayvon Martin and exonerate him?
And in reply, try to avoid talking about the law, because in Trayvon's case, the law took its entire, exhausting course and thus you are in no position to criticize the outcome.