Genetic connection with IVC for Entire South Asia.

[Mentee]

Genetic connection with rome for entire europe . Sounds outrageous!

 

[Juggernaut_Flat_Plane_V8]

Seriously what has come out of area that is presently called Pakistan compared to what is considered India ?

lot of good things really..the area that is Pakistan has a legitimate rich history..nobody should ever forget about that

 

[Maira La]

BANGLADESHI...follow the academic links that I already given you regarding that

POSHCHIM BANGLADESHI, I know enough about Rakhigarhi to know there's nothing pre-IVC about it, but I will still check what academic links you posted (that wiki copy/paste?) when I have some time. Guessing it's just the regular Shinde and Rai nationalistic bs in the name of 'academic'.

 

[Juggernaut_Flat_Plane_V8]

POSHCHIM BANGLADESHI, I know enough about Rakhigarhi to know there's nothing pre-IVC about it, but I will still check what academic links you posted (that wiki copy/paste?) when I have some time. Guessing it's just the regular Shinde and Rai nationalistic bs in the name of 'academic'.

I am Bengali...you are BANGLADESHI...without us giving you guys shelter...1971 would have been impossible...so I guess you are welcome for that?

 

[F-6 enthusiast]

I am Bengali...you are BANGLADESHI...without us giving you guys shelter...1971 would have been impossible...so I guess you are welcome for that?

Call yourselves whatever you like, at the end of the day , we have a ''desh''

 

[Bilal.]

I am Bengali...you are BANGLADESHI...without us giving you guys shelter...1971 would have been impossible...so I guess you are welcome for that?

That’s your argument? Now trying to show that you gave them some favor so they should agree to your preposterous claims? Now I know whose smoking the pot left by the IVC guy near @Maira La ’s birthplace

 

[Maira La]

Seriously what has come out of area that is presently called Pakistan compared to what is considered India ?

What is considered India is not India but a Western mistake. Ancient India is now a Pakistani province called Sindh. Remember some time ago even USA was India, so was Indonesia. You white men are stupid.

What has come out of the region called Pakistan? The Vedic culture was literally created in Pakistan and is now followed by 1.4 billion Gangetics and Deccanis. Modern Hindus though are unhygienic and dirty and have little genetic connection to Vedic people except Brahmins who (the northern ones) are like a hybrid of 50% eastern Pakistani and 50% black adivasi.

 

[Juggernaut_Flat_Plane_V8]

What is considered India is not India but a Western mistake. Ancient India is now a Pakistani province called Sindh. Remember some time ago even USA was India, so was Indonesia. You white men are stupid.

What has come out of the region called Pakistan? The Vedic culture was literally created in Pakistan and is now followed by 1.4 billion Gangetics and Deccanis. Modern Hindus though are unhygienic and dirty and have little genetic connection to Vedic people except Brahmins who (the northern ones) are like a hybrid of 50% eastern Pakistani and 50% black adivasi.

stop your lies BANGLADESHI ..this is the definite answer




Let's see it in a way people would understand

Babylonian World Map ca. 600 BCE: (No Mention of Indus or hte big continents only focussing on the Fertile Crescent)

Map of Anaximander ca. 550 BC: (Shows Asia but not much else for our relevance)

Map of Hecataeus of Miletus ca. 500 BCE identifies Indus Valley as India

Eratosthenes ca. 200 BCE (Shows Entire subcontinent as India)

Posidonious ca.100 BCE (fails to show either Indus or Indus Valley or India or fails to name them properly)

Strabo roughly 1 AD: (Shows entire subcontinent as India)

Pomponius Mela ca.40 AD: (Debatable but I would say he shows entire subcontinent as India)

Ptolemy's world Map: (shows Two Indias..One between Indus River and Ganges and another East of Ganges)

Tabula Peutingeriana ca.300 AD : (basically a road network map of Roman Empire still tries to squeeze contemporary knowledge of the world...The Word India extends till south and the sea opening of Rive Ganges)

I rest my case.. Ertosthenes onwards, India has meant the whole of subcontinental landmass ....that's 2,200 years

More than the history of even Christianity


I have deliberately not included the higher resilution images as that may crash many computers..You are encouraged to find the higher resolutions on wikicommons, if in doubt

 

[Maira La]

Shows Entire subcontinent as India

You have to understand the maps are not drawn to scale. What is labelled India may be just North West subcontinent whereas the rest that is beyond this 'India' is what today is your country.

 

[Juggernaut_Flat_Plane_V8]

You have to understand the maps are not drawn to scale. What is labelled India may be just North West subcontinent whereas the rest that is beyond this 'India' is what today is your country.

maps showed the contemporary understanding of the greeks in different ages

 

[Saiful Islam]

You have to understand the maps are not drawn to scale. What is labelled India may be just North West subcontinent whereas the rest that is beyond this 'India' is what today is your country.

Off topic, by the way this thread is interesting to say the least lol.
Does the IVC have any connection with BD? If so to what degree, because there seems to be a tug of war between whose it is

lol

 

[Maira La]

Off topic, by the way this thread is interesting to say the least lol.
Does the IVC have any connection with BD? If so to what degree, because there seems to be a tug of war between whose it is

lol

It's mostly a Pakistani thing with some late stage sites in eastern Punjab, Haryana, Gujarat.

We have some genetic connection to the people as 30-35% of our DNA comes from IVC farmers (in other words Ancient Iranian farmers). Sort of like how 40-60% of European DNA comes from ancient Anatolian farmers. Rest of our DNA is native, with some small East Asian and even smaller IE (Aryan) contribution.

 

[Saiful Islam]

It's mostly a Pakistani thing with some late stage sites in eastern Punjab, Haryana, Gujarat.

We have some genetic connection to the people as 30-35% of our DNA comes from IVC farmers (in other words Ancient Iranian farmers). Sort of like how 40-60% of European DNA comes from ancient Anatolian farmers. Rest of our DNA is native, with some small East Asian and even smaller IE (Aryan) contribution.

Would you not consider the East Asian component to be somewhat significant? Especially in Sylhet & CTG.

 

[Maira La]

Would you not consider the East Asian component to be somewhat significant? Especially in Sylhet & CTG.

Yeah it is.

With harappaworld calculator I get around 14.5% East Asian (NE and SE Asian combined). I am not Sylheti or Chatgaia. I am guessing they (you) will score more. Also people from Rangpur should score elevated East Asian.

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

What is considered India is not India but a Western mistake. Ancient India is now a Pakistani province called Sindh. Remember some time ago even USA was India, so was Indonesia. You white men are stupid.

What has come out of the region called Pakistan? The Vedic culture was literally created in Pakistan and is now followed by 1.4 billion Gangetics and Deccanis. Modern Hindus though are unhygienic and dirty and have little genetic connection to Vedic people except Brahmins who (the northern ones) are like a hybrid of 50% eastern Pakistani and 50% black adivasi.

Great post. I was pleased to learn that you are a Bangladeshi and that is literally the only thing which your detractor could say against you.

Anyway, speaking cold, hard facts. Much appreciated ma'am.

Off topic, by the way this thread is interesting to say the least lol.
Does the IVC have any connection with BD? If so to what degree, because there seems to be a tug of war between whose it is

lol

Not much. BDs do not have the cultural inferiority complex which Indians have and you should never become like them..

Btw, hope you are well bro, it has been a while. Assalam alaikum.