Well, i accept that he could say that.
But i could only say that if a war happens between india and china, he must expect that taj mahal will not be sparred even if nukes are off.
China will and must strike india really hard and one off in order to quell troublemakers in south asia.
India must add herself what did it do for pakistan (taking away pakistani people's land much) sri lanka (supporting tamil tigers and destroying 30 years of growth) , nepal(madhesi crisis, human trafficking, border disputes and killings), bhutan(influencing the king and robbing sovereignty), bangladesh(killing bangladeshi at border) and (exporting rohingyas, violate sovereignty by entering myanmar for military operations)myanmar.
The existence of taj mahal must therefore be on the negotiating table in any future war between india and china and/or pakistan to force india to back down.
In fact, in future, i believe pakistan should use taj mahal as a bargaining chip to take back kashmir.
@proud_indian @fsayed @Alphacharlie
@SorryNotSorry @Star Wars
@#hydra#
@navtrek @doe33
@gslv mk3 @Stephen Cohen
@SOUTHie
@AUSTERLITZ
@Jackdaws @Gurjot.S
@MandarK
@hellfire @nair @Majet Raha
@Chellam
@Navin A @MULUBJA
@AnnoyingOrange @Dem!god
@Rollno21 @wiseone2 @third eye @Guynextdoor2
@Rajaraja Chola @Abingdonboy
@gulli @The_Sidewinder
@Robinhood Pandey
@neem456
@ito @Vishwabalas @Nalini
@Tshering22 @Kal Muah
@anant_s @pothead
@Sam Vaish @deep.ocean
@Ajaxpaul @Kinetic
@Omega007 @jetray
@Dash @WhyCry @Sankpal