What's new

General Raheel Sharif in the Lap of his uncle Maj Aziz Bhatti Shaheed

They have a responsibility to make sure that if a field is lost, they give their men the chance. Besides we were kicking your @$$ in every other place. Making the men give in to extract them later is a good policy. I mean.....what war did you ever win that we should be concerned about getting our men back?

Alright, a few points:
1) '65 u lost air, navy and land.
'71 u lost on western front air and land eastern front navy.
Kargil u sustained colossal losses on land, and in air u were so humiliated that u didnt even collect the shot down pilot from us.
2) but a better policy fr ia is to let their soldiers kill thmslves
3)1965 (militarily) , 1971 (militarily) western front, Kargil on military basis.

P.S
BB stands for Benzair Bhutto
Bet u still dont know how divided ur nation is.
 
Alright, a few points:
1) '65 u lost air, navy and land.
'71 u lost on western front air and land eastern front navy.
Kargil u sustained colossal losses on land, and in air u were so humiliated that u didnt even collect the shot down pilot from us.
2) but a better policy fr ia is to let their soldiers kill thmslves
3)1965 (militarily) , 1971 (militarily) western front, Kargil on military basis.

P.S
BB stands for Benzair Bhutto
Bet u still dont know how divided ur nation is.

yeh blah blah blah my @$$ we lost.
1965- we could have attacked East Pakistan and brought you to your knees
1971- it took 8 days to wrap the whoooole thing up. Any idea that you won in anything is stupid and lame.
Kargil- your general left your men like sitting ducks. I guess nowadays you call that winning too

Lemme put it bluntly- YOU HAVE NEVER WON and WILL NEVER WIN.
 
.
1965- we could have attacked East Pakistan and brought you to your knees
.

Your PM Shastri could have simply danced at the border completely naked and we would have ourselves declared you winners.

But that isn't the case. You got your as$ whopped when there was no civil war, no terrorists like mukti bahini to help you and no distance of 1000 km to help you out. :)
 
yeh blah blah blah my @$$ we lost.
1965- we could have attacked East Pakistan and brought you to your knees
1971- it took 8 days to wrap the whoooole thing up. Any idea that you won in anything is stupid and lame.
Kargil- your general left your men like sitting ducks. I guess nowadays you call that winning too


Lemme put it bluntly- YOU HAVE NEVER WON and WILL NEVER WIN.

Signs of desperation:
Sign 1: Swearing
Sign 2: Caps Lock on
Sign 3: Quoting from temple education.

Take a walk.
 
Your PM Shastri could have simply danced at the border completely naked and we would have ourselves declared you winners.

But that isn't the case. You got your as$ whopped when there was no civil war, no terrorists like mukti bahini to help you and no distance of 1000 km to help you out. :)

Oh we had very strong presence on the east. Your country didn't have the ability to defend itself. It was a mistake. We should have taken you out and cut you into 2 pieces in 1965 itself. The nonsense you did in 1971 could have been avoided. Cost us more money. ANd cutting you off cheap would have always been worth it.
 
Oh we had very strong presence on the east. Your country didn't have the ability to defend itself. It was a mistake. We should have taken you out and cut you into 2 pieces in 1965 itself. The nonsense you did in 1971 could have been avoided. Cost us more money. ANd cutting you off cheap would have always been worth it.

No you couldn't have done that in 65. That's why you first created and supported terrorists of mukti bahini against the state. This lead to a big civil war in that region. You also closed air transport between the two regions to further weaken Pakistani military in that region. And then 9 months later you fought a war in which you succeeded in doing what you did.

This wasn't possible in 65 and hence you didn't do it. Without terrorists it was impossible. A terrorist state needed terrorists support to get this victory. :)
 
Back
Top Bottom