Dean Winchester
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2016
- Messages
- 485
- Reaction score
- -28
- Country
- Location
The CNN anchor was part of ISPR guided tour so she could not do anything on her own.You do know there is this thing called the quote button ... and regurgitating the same old tactics of "description of a video link + fail" isn't an argument. Your claim is
" A surgical strike happened, which involved your forces crossing in to our side of the LOC and targeting specific targets causing massive damages to some jihadi establishments / camps"
Do you have a single ounce of proof to back that entire claim up ? The answer is NO as you have already admitted in one of your posts before. What I do find quite amusing is how you completely denounce the reporting by CNN yet one media source is acceptable for you i.e. BBC which you literally quoted as "Proof" ... Yet when CNN reports and completely blows the cover on your "surgical strike" .. your like ... "well you see .. the reporter was taken to the Leepa Valley which has an area of such and such KM so she's in no position to report XYZ" ...
So the question now becomes ... Your BBC article also reported of an engagement at Leepa valley ... So how is that claim acceptable? After all, as per yourself, Leepa Valley has an area of 120 Km right, yet the BBC article for you is entirely correct ? Even though concluding the author goes and practically says that the Indian version is not reliable as well. Interestingly, for the BBC article, we don't even know who went to the site, who extrapolated the information, what were the sources etc.
For CNN you had a reporter on the ground, who looked Pakistani, representing an international organization, who reported on what the locals said .. What the mood was ... no mourning etc. However for some reason, in your POV the report by CNN is less reliable ?
Whereas the BBC journo could do a little independent enquiry