Dalit
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2012
- Messages
- 23,669
- Reaction score
- -12
- Country
- Location
We need to stop with this Kashmir is an integral part of Pakistan and a jugular vein of Pakistan. That boat sailed long ago- you'll never get that territory. Most of all, within the next ten years, your armed forces will not be at the level to pose a significant challenge to India with its build-up, and let's not forget the US and India now have an agreement behind the scenes for sharing intel among other things, Ukraine should be an eye opener. To put some things in perspective, at the end of the 1965 conflict, India controlled 3.5x more of Pakistan's territory than Pakistan did Indian territory.
The US/NATO are propping up India both economicaly and militarily. Pakistan should have been extremely cautious in such circumstances. What Bajwa did is intentionally weaken relations with China. At such a critical time Pakistan should have intensified it's economic and military engagement with China. Today US/NATO are further cementing relations with India. Leaving Pakistan in tatters.
Nato stops short of opening its doors to India
The Nato alliance is open to more engagement should India seek that, says Ambassador Smith.
www.dawn.com
Pakistan is weakened economically and politically. The military is playing dangerous games through political engineering. Appeasing the Americans. PDM is wrecking Pakistan and unable to stabilise the economy.
India is the real winner here and all Bajwa did is wreck Pakistan. Pakistan is today more divided. Expats don't want to support a corrupt and unstable PDM. It doesn't take a fortune teller where things are headed. There is not a single country willing to assist a corrupt imported regime. Even the IMF has backed off.
The question arises. Was it worth it?
Last edited: