What's new

GE $14 Billion in profit but pays NO TAX

IFB

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Aug 9, 2010
Messages
1,333
Reaction score
1
Country
India
Location
India
GE Chief Executive is on Obama's innovation board, his company is on top of U.S. Gov't's "friends list"

Citizens and businesses can only hope to one day be as savvy tax-wise as General Electric Comp :lol:. The tech giant earned a sweet $14.2B USD in profit in 2010. And now the U.S. government has given it a hefty gift -- a year completely free of taxes and a $3.2B USD tax benefit.

The U.S. tax rate for corporations is supposedly 35 percent. But over the years crafty politicians have collaborated with business allies to work more holes into the tax code than a block of Swiss cheese. But even in today's era of free flowing corporate tax loopholes few companies have perfected the art to the degree GE has -- making massive profits, paying no taxes, and getting a tax benefit.

Part of how it snuck its way into such a sweetheart deal is the company it keeps. President Barack Obama anointed GE's chief executive as the head of his new Council on Jobs and Competitiveness. Among the council's key roles? Discussing corporate taxes :oops:.

According to The New York Times, which first broke news of GE's incredible feat, GE spent years of "innovative accounting" and fierce lobbying to slowly slim its tax bill. But when it really started experiencing windfall gains was when it hired a former Treasury official to lead its tax department and filled its team with former IRS employees and Congressional tax specialists.

Ultimately GE's massive profits mean a load of money for the company's executives and top shareholders.

For the rest of the U.S., the situation is less rosy. Today corporations only account for 6.6 percent of the federal government's tax revenue. Small businesses and taxpaying citizens have to make up the remainder of the tax deficit. And in GE's case citizens and smalls businesses find themselves in the strange situation of financing a special bonus for the government's favorite wildly successful corporation.
:rolleyes:

GE owns a number of assets, mostly in the high tech and communications field. It owns a number of utilities, supplies power grid electronics, sells vehicle components, and even owns cable TV properties, such as NBC Universal.

Updated: March 26, 2011 10:10 a.m.

To add a few more specifics on the origins of these tax breaks, GE is largely able to get them via a clever game of disguising profits in lucrative untaxed offshore holdings.

President Ronald Reagan in the eighties tried to eliminate this kind of behavior with the 1986 Tax Reform Act. Describes Robert S. McIntyre, director of the liberal group Citizens for Tax Justice, "Cracking down on offshore profit-shifting by financial companies like G.E. was one of the important achievements of President Reagan’s 1986 Tax Reform Act. The fact that Congress was snookered into undermining that reform at the behest of companies like G.E. is an insult not just to Reagan, but to all the ordinary American taxpayers who have to foot the bill for G.E.’s rampant tax sheltering."

In the wake of the Reagan era, the loopholes to the bill's strict provisions were added during the George Bush and Bill Clinton eras. Then in 2004 President George W. Bush cooked up the American Jobs Creation Act, perhaps the biggest blow to President Reagan's policy yet. The AJCA handed GE what would amount to $1B USD in tax savings a year. Many of its provisions were reportedly custom-tailored to GE.

While President Obama and his Democratic Congress contemplated trying to roll back those provisions, a concerted $21M USD lobbying effort convinced them to drop the effort. The most vocal critic, Representative Charles B. Rangel (D-N.Y.) decided to pull back, though, killing the effort. That same year GE, at his request, donated $30M USD to New York City public schools.

While President Obama hasn't added much to the loopholes, he's done little to fight them. And his decision to install GE's CEO on his Jobs board, which plays a role in formulating corporate tax policy, is arguably a step towards preserving the company tax breaks:pop:. In that regard President Obama is following in his immediate predecessor's questionable footsteps, and continuing the rejection of President Reagan's tax reform

DailyTech - GE: $14B USD Profits, Pays No Taxes For Last Year, Gets $3.2B Tax Benefit
 
.
Wait for the Wall Street trolls to jump out: there's no corruption in the US. The US is a wonderful fairyland which is absolutely safe, no corruption, no tax thefts by GE, everyone is happy, marching towards a great bright future because of democracy! You're a commie for posting this!
 
.
Wait for the Wall Street trolls to jump out: there's no corruption in the US. The US is a wonderful fairyland which is absolutely safe, no corruption, no tax thefts by GE, everyone is happy, marching towards a great bright future because of democracy! You're a commie for posting this!

You commie..................
 
.
Wait for the Wall Street trolls to jump out: there's no corruption in the US. The US is a wonderful fairyland which is absolutely safe, no corruption, no tax thefts by GE, everyone is happy, marching towards a great bright future because of democracy! You're a commie for posting this!

China also has been controlled by the elite families, but these families cannot be lasted for more than 3 generations.

However, US has been controlled by their elite families since it was created, see how those families like Kennedy, Bush, etc, still exist.
 
.
This is a blatant mockery of the financial situation lingering in the US. And that too happening in broad day light.
 
.
This is a blatant mockery of the financial situation lingering in the US. And that too happening in broad day light.

This is capitalism, 90% of the wealth just being controlled by few people out there. :pop:

That's why China is seeking to become a democratic socialist state.
 
.
This is capitalism, 90% of the wealth just being controlled by few people out there. :pop:

That's why China is seeking to become a democratic socialist state.

I don't see China going any other way in the near future (unless things change). The rapid capitalism and nexus with the CPC in guzzling high value contracts is just a tip of the iceberg.
It is basic human nature and the cost of capitalism. I'd be happy if it changes in future, same goes for India as well.
 
.
I don't see China going any other way in the near future (unless things change). The rapid capitalism and nexus with the CPC in guzzling high value contracts is just a tip of the iceberg.
It is basic human nature and the cost of capitalism. I'd be happy if it changes in future, same goes for India as well.

True, this is the reason that i respect the Scandinavian nations, because they are the noblest people who are relatively uncorrupt by the greed of capitalism.
 
.
Wait for the Wall Street trolls to jump out: there's no corruption in the US. The US is a wonderful fairyland which is absolutely safe, no corruption, no tax thefts by GE, everyone is happy, marching towards a great bright future because of democracy! You're a commie for posting this!

:pop: there's no corruption in the US. The US is a wonderful fairyland which is absolutely safe, no corruption, no tax thefts by GE, everyone is happy, marching towards a great bright future because of democracy! You're a commie for posting this!
 
.
I don't see China going any other way in the near future (unless things change). The rapid capitalism and nexus with the CPC in guzzling high value contracts is just a tip of the iceberg.
It is basic human nature and the cost of capitalism. I'd be happy if it changes in future, same goes for India as well.

No, We will change.
When we completed the accumulation of industrial, When we have a strong enough state capital, We will change.
Nordic countries are our role models.
 
.
Considering how many banks and companies closed in USA , I think giving few large corporations a break was good move profits = more job creation = healthy economy
 
.
On one hand they want to cut government funding to programs that benefit the poor on the other they give tax breaks to the rich....why only the poor people are being punished and not the rich? and this notion that if you give tax break to the rich it will create more jobs is flawed....tax is a cost to a corporation if a corporation is given a tax break means its cost becomes less meaning more profit....Just because they get more profit doesnt mean they are gonna hire more people.The excess profit these corporation get will only benefit the executives in the form of large bonuses and its shareholders. During the clinton era unemployment reduced from 7.5% to like 4 % during the same period tax for the rich increased from 31% to 39% :undecided:.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom