What's new

Gaza-Israel Conflict | October 2023

No, that's not what PPP means.
It means that the purchasing parity within the country is a lot higher.
This is due to the low cost of Labour and low living standards in India, which means that a lot more can be purchased for the same amount, theoretically making the average person better off on paper, but not when you have a colossal population like India.

You've again proven that India suffers from a colossal amount of poverty due to the massive value of its PPP economy within the nation and that a lot more can be bought for a lot less due to the higher value of currency to the average person.

Of course this is going to be lower in the UK where the currency value for the average person is lower due to the higher prices of commodities and services due to having a much more advanced educational and operational system, which leads to much higher competition in demand and therefore better living standards in the long run
You should be counting GDP PER CAPITA. :-)

Overpopulated countries like India will always rank at the top.

Compare with China, who has a similar population as yours, and look at the piss-poor gau mutra showing.

And Comparing London, Shanghai, Beijing and HongKong with Mumbai is like comparing your kaamwali bai to Aishwarya Rai.

Not even in the same league as infra, city services, convenience to access parts of the city and a hundred other things.

I know it looks good in Swarajya Mag, but come the f*ck on !!

Stay limited within India.

Don't make me post pictures of Dharavi slums - which should be enough.

how you people think of Philippines, the NIC member as below? are the countries like Philippines able to feed themselves? :what:
here we have table of NIC, current. we find GDP on PPP per Capita of India is close to Philippines-Indonesia, have a close look on the table as below.

here i would say, India-Philippines-Vietnam-China might be having similar ratio of 'undocumented' part of GDP :enjoy:
 
Last edited:
. .
I mean look at history, Egypt made peace and got their land back from Israel which they lost. I also think ordinary Israeli don’t want to keep fighting for ever.
I believe Palestinian will get one more chance after this war as too much destruction will sway people to rethink but I don’t think Iran will allow any solution to reach.
Will solution be fair to Palestinian? Most likely no but they are not in position of strength. Palestinian would have got much fairer outcome in 40s lesser in 60s even lesser now and it will get less and less after every brutal attack by Hamas or Hizbollah.

Maybe your heart is in the right place but you are very naive to think Israelis would have allowed any semblance of 'normal' life to Palestinians. The idea always was and remains a state for Jews where Muslims and even Christians are to be second class citizens.
As for the non-violent route, no, that doesn't work in Palestine. Blood soaked thousands of years old long history to prove that. You want a Gandhi? Go and see Mahmoud Abbas sitting in Ramallah who needs Israeli permission to even take a flight out of the West Bank!
As to the bolded parts, beg to differ: Nothing lasts forever and Israel is in a very precarious position now and multiple Western analysts, including a pro Israel Col. Macgregor himself saying that Israel's very existence is under great threat.
About Iran: They have said they would accept whatever Palestinians would accept. Iran is a remote player in this conflict and is actually losing its immense potentials due to the rivalry against Israel otherwise, with a young, educated, dynamic population and great natural resources, Iran is THE candidate for the richest country in the Middle East with the possible exception of Israel.

PS. But you are probably correct that most Hindus are not anti-Palestinians. We need to not jump to conclusions describing a community of a billion+ people based on the internet posts or some thousands of Hindus in the West or in India.
 
. . .
I mean look at history, Egypt made peace and got their land back from Israel which they lost. I also think ordinary Israeli don’t want to keep fighting for ever.
Not without 6 october 1973 war.( which was saturday)
We had to kill thousands of them and sacrifice some of our soldiers in order to convince them thats not their land.
Without this war they would have thought sinani is their land.

Hamas is doing the same. They have chosen 7 october ( saturday) to mimic egypt's attack and they were successful, they humiliated israel and its IDF and the war isnt over, lets see what gonna happen.
 
.
A message to Azerbaijan?

Iran calls on all Muslim countries to halt exports of oil and food to the Nazi Israeli regime



Sadly, true.

Iran is 1000 miles away, how do you want them to go to war with Israel?

And Hamas existed before they had any relationship with Iran, they have autonomy and obviously resist a brutal occupation and ritual humiliation, nothing to do with Iran, but for some people they see Iran everywhere, use a dream catcher and maybe you will not see iran in your nightmares any more

Hamas received more funding from Israel itself than it did Iran. The Hamas leadership are all billionaires.
 
.
why club India with Russia ?
Nothing in common except a long term military equipment trade relationship
we share Veto power and other means of Russia together. here 'we' include Delhi-Tehran-Moscow :mps:
No, that's not what PPP means.
It means that the purchasing parity within the country is a lot higher.
This is due to the low cost of Labour and low living standards in India, which means that a lot more can be purchased for the same amount, theoretically making the average person better off on paper, but not when you have a colossal population like India.

You've again proven that India suffers from a colossal amount of poverty due to the massive value of its PPP economy within the nation and that a lot more can be bought for a lot less due to the higher value of currency to the average person.

Of course this is going to be lower in the UK where the currency value for the average person is lower due to the higher prices of commodities and services due to having a much more advanced educational and operational system, which leads to much higher competition in demand and therefore better living standards in the long run
why club India with Russia ?
Nothing in common except a long term military equipment trade relationship
we share "Veto power" and other means of Russia together. here 'we' include Delhi-Tehran-Moscow :mps:
 
Last edited:
.
If Israel created Hamas, why then are Muslims supporting the terrorism of Hamas madly?
Why don't they declare Hamas to be terrorists?
Why don't they declare Iran and Hizbullah to be terrorists for supplying weapons to Hamas?


Because resistance against occupation is the right of a occupied people

Hamas are not terrorists, they are fighting for their occupied people against a evil state

Israel is a the evil apartheid occupier
 
.
Not without 6 october 1973 war.( which was saturday)
We had to kill thousands of them and sacrifice some of our soldiers in order to convince them thats not their land.
Without this war they would have thought sinani is their land.

Hamas is doing the same. They have chosen 7 october ( saturday) to mimic egypt's attack and they were successful, they humiliated israel and its IDF and the war isnt over, lets see what gonna happen.

Correct.
Also, the Sinai Peninsula is too big to occupy for long. Even occupation of small parts of Gaza was too costly for Israel. Israel is very mindful of taking its own casualties and 'giving back' Sinai was a strategic necessity. Israel has a low population of Jews and they need to be living in fertile land and not in Sinai or Negev--and hence, like a true colonizer, it is stealing good land from the Palestinians, Syrians, and Lebanon.
 
.
.
#Urgent

Israeli Army Spokesman: The Chief of Staff approved the plan to continue the war

Hamas received more funding from Israel itself than it did Iran. The Hamas leadership are all billionaires.

They are most definitely not. This is Israeli propaganda.
 
.
The idea always was and remains a state for Jews where Muslims and even Christians are to be second class citizens.
There are sizeable number of Palestinians in Israel today and they seem to have a normal life not very different from Israelis. Hence your hypothesis remains difficult to prove. However, in every Arab and almost all Muslim majority nations, throughout history and still today, non-Muslims have been inferior citizens/subjects both de jure and de facto. One can easily see in the Arab states today. In Saudi Arabia and many other states, non-Islamic religious items can't be brought in or used. One can't build a Church or a Synagogue or a Temple without very strict government permit.
 
. . .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom