What's new

Gaza-Israel Conflict | October 2023

.

Max Blumenthal is a really well known media figure in America!! Jason Hinkle is still relatively unknown and was starting to rise in blogsphere through his YouTube channel, questioning the narrative about the Ukraine war, but then his channel got 'demonetized'. He was very dejected. I am not even sure his channel exists anymore. But then Rand Paul--a powerful well known US Senator also had to leave You Tube.
I had sent donation to Jason Hinkle months ago and will do so again. The change in American policy is going to come from Americans--White Anglo Saxon Protestants (the WASPs) --and they should be preferably supported. Tucker Carson alone has done major damage to the Neo Cons agenda about Ukraine and is now targeting the Neo Cons about Israeli Palestinians conflict. Yes, Tucker Carson, of all people!!!

And here is another You Tuber, who has a surgical blade's precision about facts, tirelessly exposing the Israel lies. I have financially supported him too even if a few bucks here and there. In this video Norton is describing how Israelis slaughtered those escaping northern Gaza to southern Gaza.

 
.
Well if pakistan sends a couple Saheen 3.
With maybe 20/ kt war heads..

ISreal along with neighbour arabs are aldo fckked

Who says we will? We can reach Israel. That was the question.
 
.
I suspected this. WW3 is around the corner, but not just yet.


They are all talks
Iran is not the palastinians sevior
They are downing from the tree they climbed
Israel can distroy all Iran refinery and causing huge damage.
Also , usa have 2 aircraft carrier that can carpet parts in iran
They are not stupid. The most they can do is do try to activate hizbullah in some part but hizbullah will not danger itself and it's arsenal for gaza war. Also Lebanon will not sustain a war of this kind with Israel.
 
. .
.
Well if pakistan sends a couple Saheen 3.
With maybe 20/ kt war heads..

ISreal along with neighbour arabs are aldo fckked
Stopped your imagination.
Israel also have nuclear weapons and ICBM with the range that can reach every part of the world
 
. . . . .
Are you stupid or something they massacred over 700 children and your saying they showing restraint. There is huge international pressure on them now the initial support they had has started to dissipate with pictures of dead Palestinian women and children. They are opening because of this pressure and it suits them,yet to see if something has happened on the ground or this is another lie by the apartheid regime.
He cynical piece of shit, probably turks sold him bad kebab or something.
 
. .
In words of their own holy scripture, the sinful corrupt nation, laden with iniquity, seed of evildoers consider it a religious blessing to kill the children


View attachment 962290

View attachment 962291
The first perspective is Divine Justice, which serves as the default, baseline, and traditional perspective. The other three perspectives will not contradict Divine Justice, but rather will complement it.


We turn first to the Book of Wisdom, chapter 12, where the inspired author discusses the people of Canaan and their conquest.


For truly, the ancient inhabitants of your holy land, whom you hated for deeds most odious— works of sorcery and impious sacrifices; These merciless murderers of children, devourers of human flesh, and initiates engaged in a blood ritual, and parents who took with their own hands defenseless lives, You willed to destroy by the hands of our ancestors, that the land that is dearest of all to you might receive a worthy colony of God’s servants.
Wisdom 12:2-7

The sins mentioned include the widespread practice of sacrificing their infants and toddlers to Molech and other idolatries. A few verses later, God’s justice is discussed.


…For who can say to you, “What have you done?” or who can oppose your decree? Or when peoples perish, who can challenge you, their maker; or who can come into your presence to vindicate the unrighteous? For neither is there any god besides you who have the care of all, that you need show you have not unjustly condemned; Nor can any king or prince confront you on behalf of those you have punished. But as you are righteous, you govern all things righteously; you regard it as unworthy of your power to punish one who has incurred no blame.
Wisdom 12:12-15




But are these criticisms valid? Is the God of the Old Testament a “moral monster” who arbitrarily commands genocide against innocent men, women, and children? Was His reaction to the sins of the Canaanites and the Amalekites a vicious form of “ethnic cleansing”? Or is it possible that God could have had morally sufficient reasons for ordering the destruction of these nations?

A basic knowledge of Canaanite culture reveals its inherent moral wickedness. The Canaanites were a brutal, aggressive people who engaged in bestiality, incest, and even child sacrifice. Deviant sexual acts were the norm. The Canaanites’ sin was so repellent that God said, “The land vomited out its inhabitants” (Leviticus 18:25). Even so, the destruction was directed more at the Canaanite religion (Deuteronomy 7:3–5; 12:2–3) than at the Canaanite people per se. The judgment was not ethnically motivated. Individual Canaanites, like Rahab in Jericho, could still find that mercy follows repentance (Joshua 2). God’s desire is that the wicked turn from their sin rather than die (Ezekiel 18:31–32; 33:11).

Besides dealing with national sins, God used the conquest of Canaan to create a religious/historical context in which He could eventually introduce the Messiah to the world. This Messiah would bring salvation not only to Israel, but also to Israel’s enemies, including Canaan (Psalm 87:4–6; Mark 7:25–30).

It must be remembered that God gave the Canaanite people more than sufficient time to repent of their evil ways—over 400 years! The book of Hebrews tells us that the Canaanites were “disobedient,” which implies moral culpability on their part (Hebrews 11:31). The Canaanites were aware of God’s power (Joshua 2:10–11; 9:9) and could have sought repentance. Except in rare instances, they continued their rebellion against God until the bitter end.

But didn’t God also command the Israelites to kill non-combatants? The biblical record is clear that He did. Here again, we must remember that, while it is true the Canaanite women did not fight, this in no way means they were innocent, as their seductive behavior in Numbers 25 indicates (Numbers 25:1–3). However, the question still remains: what about the children? This is not an easy question to answer, but we must keep several things in mind. First, no human person (including infants) is truly innocent. The Scripture teaches that we are all born in sin (Psalm 51:5; 58:3). This implies that all people are morally culpable for Adam’s sin in some way. Infants are just as condemned from sin as adults are.

Second, God is sovereign over all of life and can take it whenever He sees fit. God and God alone can give life, and God alone has the right to take it whenever He so chooses. In fact, He ultimately takes every person’s life at death. It is not our life to begin with but God’s. While it is wrong for us to take a life, except in instances of capital punishment, war, and self-defense, this does not mean that it is wrong for God to do so. We intuitively recognize this when we accuse some person or authority who takes human life as “playing God.” God is under no obligation to extend anyone’s life for even another day. How and when we die is completely up to Him.

Third, an argument could be made that it would have been cruel for God to take the lives of all the Canaanites except the infants and children. Without the protection and support of their parents, the infants and small children were likely to face death anyway due to starvation. The chances of survival for an orphan in the ancient Near East were not good.

Finally, the children of Canaan would have likely grown up sympathetic to the evil religions their parents had practiced. It was time for the culture of idolatry and perversion to end in Canaan, and God wanted to use Israel to end it. Also, the orphaned children of Canaan would naturally have grown up resentful of the Israelites. Likely, some would have later sought to avenge the “unjust” treatment of their parents and return Canaan to paganism.

It’s also worth considering the eternal state of those infants killed in Canaan. If God took them before the age of moral accountability, then they went straight to heaven (as we believe). Those children are in a far better place than if they had lived into adulthood as Canaanites.

Surely, the issue of God commanding violence in the Old Testament is difficult. However, we must remember that God sees things from an eternal perspective, and His ways are not our ways (Isaiah 55:8–9). The apostle Paul tells us that God is both kind and severe (Romans 11:22). While it is true that God’s holy character demands that sin be punished, His grace and mercy remain extended to those who are willing to repent and be saved. The Canaanite destruction provides us with a sober reminder that, while our God is gracious and merciful, He is also a God of holiness and wrath.

 
.
Daddy America and US taxpayers will pay endlessly.

They cannot ditch Israel as it is an indispensable tool for the petro-dollar hegemony.

If Israel ceases to exist, then all ME countries will ditch the king dollar and the US economy will immediately collapse into rubbles like the house of cards.

Their government will support Israel until their last breath.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom