What's new

FT.com: How China Rules The Waves (Shipbuilding Tech, Port Tech, Shipping & Maritime Network)

Ship built by GSI for Swedish company named at grand ceremony
By ZHENG CAIXIONG in Guangzhou | chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2018-12-08 16:28
f_art.gif
w_art.gif
in_art.gif
more_art.gif


5c0b80e6a310eff3690a0dc4.jpeg
A 1-billion-yuan ro-ro passenger vessel built by GSI for Swedish company Gotland is named VISBORG during a grand ceremony in Guangzhou on Saturday. [Photo by Zheng Caixiong/chinadaily.com.cn]

A new and luxury ro-ro passenger vessel built by Guangzhou Shipyard International Company Ltd for Swedish company Rederi AB Gotland was named VISBORG in a naming ceremony in Guangdong provincial capital on Saturday.

"We Rederi AB Gotland are very proud of the 'VISBORG' which is among the most sophisticated RoPax with LNG ual-fuel propulsion in the world and which is a further confirmation of the high quality and innovation of Chinese shipbuilding," said Ann-Marie Ami Astrom, chairwoman of Gotland.

"We hope to be able to order many more ships at GSI and China State Shipbuilding Company," she said.

Chen Zhongqian, chairman of GSI, said the vessel is a landmark product for GSI's revitalization after the company moved to Longxue island, located at the mouth of the Pearl River, from the city's Liwan district in July last year.

Construction of the vessel has cost more than 1 billion yuan ($149 million), a record high in building a single ocean and engineering ship in GSI's history, Chen said.

"The successful construction of this vessel has laid a good foundation for GSI to proceed in the luxury Ropax market as our highly-quality development direction. And to date GSI has in hand the largest Ropax orders in China," Chen added.

The high standard and environment friendly Ropax vessel is driven by dual-fuel engines and its navigational speed can reach 28.5 knots to become one of the fastest ro-ro passenger vessels in the world.

At 200 meters long and 25.2 meters wide, the vessel is designed to have a capacity of 1,730 passengers.

The vessel will operate between Wisky island and Oskarshamn Port. It also comes with entertainment facilities.


a80395e7gy1fxzjhdkp1bj20u00k0adr.jpg

a80395e7gy1fxzjhkvpayj20u00gw0w8.jpg

a80395e7gy1fxzjhcq5mcj20u00cctav.jpg

a80395e7gy1fxzjhh8tnvj20u00gwmz1.jpg

a80395e7gy1fxzjhidb7kj20u00gwtbz.jpg

a80395e7gy1fxzjhipam4j20u00gwtbi.jpg

a80395e7gy1fxzjhoehvbj20u00gwabz.jpg


 
.
China's CSP, UAE's Abu Dhabi Ports launch new terminal
Source: Xinhua| 2018-12-11 21:28:02|Editor: Liangyu


137666649_15445356490561n.jpg
Photo taken on Dec. 10, 2018 shows China's COSCO Shipping Ports Limited (CSP) Abu Dhabi Terminal at Khalifa Port, the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The CSP and Abu Dhabi Ports inaugurated on Monday a new terminal at Khalifa Port. (Xinhua/Su Xiaopo)

DUBAI, Dec. 11 (Xinhua) -- China's COSCO Shipping Ports Limited (CSP) and Abu Dhabi Ports inaugurated on Monday a new terminal at Khalifa Port.

The terminal was formally inaugurated at a ceremony by Sheikh Hamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, chief of Abu Dhabi crown prince's court.

The ceremony was also attended by Sheikh Theyab bin Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, chairman of Abu Dhabi Department of Transport, Ning Jizhe, deputy head of China's National Development and Reform Commission and other officials from China and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) as well as representative of CSP.

At the inauguration, Sheikh Hamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan emphasized the cordial and productive relations between the UAE and China over the past 34 years.

"China and the UAE share a strong and long-standing bond across a variety of ties, including economic, cultural, and trade. We look forward to nurturing our partnership in a spirit of friendly cooperation," he said.

"The decision by COSCO Shipping Ports to invest in Abu Dhabi shows our strategic location, attractive business environment and supportive regulation. We believe that it will open the door to more foreign direct investment," he added.

The CSP Abu Dhabi Terminal has a design capacity of 2.5 million TEU (twenty-foot equivalent units) and will begin with a handling capacity of 1.5 million TEU.

The water depth of the terminal is 16.5 meters, allowing it to accommodate mega-vessels typically carrying in excess of 20,000 TEU.

"The inauguration ceremony is not only a milestone in the cooperation of Belt and Road Initiative, but also a good start for China and UAE's pragmatic cooperation in other key areas," Ning said.

China is the UAE's largest non-oil trade partner. In 2017, bilateral trade between the two countries increased by 15 percent to more than 53 billion U.S. dollars, representing 14.7 percent of the UAE's total foreign trade.

137666649_15445370554431n.jpg


HH-Sheikh-Hamed-attends-opening-of-the-CSP-Abu-Dhabi-Terminal-at-Khalifa-Port-3.jpg

HH-Sheikh-Hamed-attends-opening-of-the-CSP-Abu-Dhabi-Terminal-at-Khalifa-Port-2.jpg

 
.
China's latest self-developed LNG carrier gets delivered
CGTN
Published on Jan 8, 2019

"Fanfei," China's latest liquefied natural gas (LNG) carrier, was delivered to its user on January 8, 2019, at Changxing Island of Shanghai. The Fanfei LNG carrier is in combination of the latest scientific and technological achievements of China.
 
.
Asia's largest dredging vessel returns after completing sea trial
Source: Xinhua| 2019-01-09 18:29:35|Editor: zh


137731266_15470401988191n.jpg
Chinese-built dredging vessel Tian Kun Hao is seen sailing on the sea on Jan. 8, 2019. Tian Kun Hao, a Chinese-built dredging vessel, which is the largest of its kind in Asia, returned to the shipyard Wednesday after completing its sea trial of nearly three months. The 140-meter-long, 27.8-meter-wide vessel can dig as deep as 35 meters under the sea floor and dredge 6,000 cubic meters per hour, according to its investor, Tianjin Dredging Co., a subsidiary of China Communication Construction Co. (Xinhua)

TIANJIN, Jan. 9 (Xinhua) -- A Chinese-built dredging vessel, the largest of its kind in Asia, returned to the shipyard Wednesday after completing its sea trial of nearly three months.

The 140-meter-long, 27.8-meter-wide vessel, named Tian Kun Hao, can dig as deep as 35 meters under the sea floor and dredge 6,000 cubic meters per hour, according to its investor, Tianjin Dredging Co., a subsidiary of China Communication Construction Co.

It set sail off the coast of the city of Qidong in east China's Jiangsu Province in October for a mud-dredging trial, during which it dredged a maximum of 7,501 cubic meters per hour, delivered the excavated mud some 15 km away, and realized unmanned automatic dredging.

On Nov. 23, it began a bedrock-digging test near the coastal city of Dalian and succeeded in digging rocks with a hardness of 60 MPa.

The dredging, delivery and intelligent control systems of the vessel withstood the test, with all the specifications meeting or exceeding the design standards, said Wang Jian, the chief engineer.

Wang said the vessel will be formally put into use after completing the shipyard check.
 
.
A city born from ocean! China-built Colombo Port City completes land reclamation
New China TV
Published on Jan 15, 2019

With China's cutting-edge dredgers working hard, Colombo Port City, a mega project under Belt and Road Initiative, has recently completed land reclamation.
 
.
Feature: Sino-Greek cooperation at Piraeus achieves impressive results
Source: Xinhua| 2019-01-20 13:56:21|Editor: Shi Yinglun
by Maria Spiliopoulou, Yu Shuaishuai, Li Xiaopeng

PIRAEUS, GREECE, Jan. 19 (Xinhua) -- Regarded as the "southern gate" of Europe, Piraeus -- which means "guarding the passage" in Greek -- is now the second largest port in the Mediterranean Sea.

A decade after the Chinese shipping company's first investment in Piraeus port, China-Greek cooperation is striving to make Piraeus the number one port in the Mediterranean Sea, port representatives told Xinhua in a recent interview.

China Ocean Shipping Company (COSCO Group) is a Chinese state-owned shipping and logistics services supplier company. It ranks third both in the number of container ships and in aggregate container volume in the world. In 2016, the COSCO Group merged with China Shipping Group to form China COSCO Shipping.

In 2008, the former COSCO Group obtained a 35-year franchise right of No.2 and NO.3 container terminals of the Piraeus. In 2016, the COSCO Shipping acquired a 67 percent stake in the Piraeus port authority for 368.5 million euros (418.9 million U.S. dollars), officially becoming the operator of the port.

The development of Piraeus in recent years is the encouraging results of the cooperation between Greece and China within the framework of the Belt and Road Initiative.

Amid the debt crisis that hit Greek hard, local economy has benefited from the investment that improved the port's image with impressive results, said Vassilis Korkidis, president of Piraeus Chamber of Commerce and Industry.

He said that the COSCO's investment in the port is a "flagship project" of Greece, which greatly improved the throughput capacity of the port and created vast numbers of employment opportunities.

"It was an investment of more than 3.5 billion euros. A lot of activities were motivated with the development of the port, which means new jobs -- much better paid jobs than other workers' in Greece," he explained.

Since the COSCO's involvement in 2008, the port's annual throughput capacity has been raised from the initial 0.68 million TEUs (Twenty-foot Equivalent Unit) to 4.15 million TEUs in 2017. The port is now ranked 36th among the 100 biggest ports of the world (Lloyd's List), up from 93rd when the COSCO took over.

"It is a very great achievement and it is still developing. As the most rapidly developing port in the world, we want to keep this pace and strive to be number one in the Mediterranean Sea," Korkidis said.

According to Korkidis, the partnership between the COSCO Shipping, one of the world's largest shipping groups, and the Greek shipowners, who own the world's largest fleet, is "a great marriage."

"The COSCO's investment, in my view, is the only real investment in Greece, because they brought the money and put it into infrastructure," Korkidis said.

Tassos Vamvakidis, PCT Commercial Manager, shares the same determination to further develop Piraeus. He has been working at the port for 40 years since he joined the shipping industry when he was 16 years old.

Vamvakidis told Xinhua that his initial decision to join the COSCO was made after he saw the company's transformation of the port, especially the container terminal.

"The port's situation had been very bad before the COSCO took it over. The customer service at the port was very poor. When I saw the great change later, I happily decided to join in," Vamvakidis said.

The road to success was not always rosy. "It was one of the very first private investments in Greece ever, so the general reaction of the unions was not very good. And it took us so much time to clarify that COSCO Shipping is an investor, not an invader," Vamvakidis said.

"Very hard work was done, and day by day, we gained the respect and understanding of the market and the public. I am very happy and honored as a member of this team who convinced the market that they made a very good decision," he added.

As a star employee, Vamvakidis also represented the COSCO Shipping to attend the first Belt and Road Forum in Beijing, China. "The Belt and Road Initiative is not just about business investment, it is about people-to-people exchanges," he said.

"I was at the people-to-people session of the Forum, and I explained how Greeks behave and their love for the sea, the world, and the time-honored civilization," he told Xinhua.

"I agree with this initiative, which is highly beneficial for Greece. We should spare no efforts joining and supporting the Belt and Road Initiative," the Greek manager said.
 
.
A decade after the Chinese shipping company's first investment in Piraeus port, China-Greek cooperation is striving to make Piraeus the number one port in the Mediterranean Sea, port representatives told Xinhua in a recent interview.

China Ocean Shipping Company (COSCO Group) is a Chinese state-owned shipping and logistics services supplier company. It ranks third both in the number of container ships and in aggregate container volume in the world. In 2016, the COSCO Group merged with China Shipping Group to form China COSCO Shipping.

When COSCO bought the stake many US neofascists and their big and small poodles were jumping up and higher, arguing that the investment was a waste, Greece would eventually end up with debt and a dysfunctional port.

In fact, the port becomes third largest in the world in terms of the number of container ship and volume.

So much for China debt trap.
 
.
Chinese giant inks 445-mln-USD deal with Algeria's Sonatrach
Source: Xinhua| 2019-01-22 04:55:59|Editor: Mu Xuequan

ALGIERS, Jan. 21 (Xinhua) -- China Harbor Engineering Company (CHEC) signed on Monday in Algiers a contract worth 445 million U.S. dollars with state-owned corporation Sonatrach for port installations in eastern Algeria, APS news agency reported.

According to the contract, CHEC will provide studies of and set up a terminal for liquefied gas, and build marine and harbor infrastructure for a fuel terminal in the province of Skikda, 400 km east of the capital Algiers.

The project, to take 28 months to finish, should allow the upgrade of the liquefied natural gas production to 220,000 cubic meters per day and the loading of large-capacity methane tankers to between 50,000 and 250,000 tons.

Part of Sonatrach's 2030 Strategy, the construction of a new liquefied gas terminal and the expansion works in the oil terminal of Skikda will allow Sonatrach to incease its production and open up to more international markets, said Abdelmoumen Ould Kaddour, Sonatrach group's CEO, after the signing ceremony.
 
.
China still leading in global shipbuilding industry
Source: Xinhua| 2019-01-26 22:06:41|Editor: ZX

BEIJING, Jan. 26 (Xinhua) -- China maintained its top position in the global shipbuilding industry last year, an association said.

In 2018, Chinese companies built 43.2 percent of the new ships in the world, up from 41.9 percent a year ago, cementing the country's leading role in the sector, the China Association of the National Shipbuilding Industry said in a report.

China received 43.9 percent of global new orders last year and held 42.8 percent of the existing orders.

From the 1950s to the beginning of the 21st century, the three indices were topped by Japan or the Republic of Korea. In 2010, China exceeded the ROK and ranked the first in the world.

Given a lackluster global economy, however, the shipbuilding industry still faces grim circumstances, such as fierce competition and dropping profits, and Chinese companies are no exception.

The association warned of the lingering challenges and said more efforts are needed to improve competitiveness and profitability.

Chinese shipbuilders should seize the opportunity from further opening-up of the industry and ramp up research and development investment to achieve technological breakthroughs and channel more energy into developing liquefied natural gas carriers, the association suggested.
 
.
China still leading in global shipbuilding industry

Xinhua, January 27, 2019

China maintained its top position in the global shipbuilding industry last year, an association said.

In 2018, Chinese companies built 43.2 percent of the new ships in the world, up from 41.9 percent a year ago, cementing the country's leading role in the sector, the China Association of the National Shipbuilding Industry said in a report.

China received 43.9 percent of global new orders last year and held 42.8 percent of the existing orders.

From the 1950s to the beginning of the 21st century, the three indices were topped by Japan or the Republic of Korea. In 2010, China exceeded the ROK and ranked the first in the world.

Given a lackluster global economy, however, the shipbuilding industry still faces grim circumstances, such as fierce competition and dropping profits, and Chinese companies are no exception.

The association warned of the lingering challenges and said more efforts are needed to improve competitiveness and profitability.

Chinese shipbuilders should seize the opportunity from further opening-up of the industry and ramp up research and development investment to achieve technological breakthroughs and channel more energy into developing liquefied natural gas carriers, the association suggested.

http://www.china.org.cn/business/2019-01/27/content_74414213.htm
 
.
China still leading in global shipbuilding industry

Xinhua, January 27, 2019

China maintained its top position in the global shipbuilding industry last year, an association said.

In 2018, Chinese companies built 43.2 percent of the new ships in the world, up from 41.9 percent a year ago, cementing the country's leading role in the sector, the China Association of the National Shipbuilding Industry said in a report.

China received 43.9 percent of global new orders last year and held 42.8 percent of the existing orders.

From the 1950s to the beginning of the 21st century, the three indices were topped by Japan or the Republic of Korea. In 2010, China exceeded the ROK and ranked the first in the world.

Given a lackluster global economy, however, the shipbuilding industry still faces grim circumstances, such as fierce competition and dropping profits, and Chinese companies are no exception.

The association warned of the lingering challenges and said more efforts are needed to improve competitiveness and profitability.

Chinese shipbuilders should seize the opportunity from further opening-up of the industry and ramp up research and development investment to achieve technological breakthroughs and channel more energy into developing liquefied natural gas carriers, the association suggested.

http://www.china.org.cn/business/2019-01/27/content_74414213.htm


Actually according to Clarkson research, the premium shipping intelligence body, Chinese new build orders were behind South Korea's for the last year.

Not only that, these statistics are usually given in tonnage. China would be further behind in value since China makes the cheap and low quality ships, while South Korea makes higher end ships.
 
.
CHINESE SHIPBUILDING AND SEAPOWER: FULL STEAM AHEAD, DESTINATION UNCHARTED
JANUARY 14, 2019 ANDREW ERICKSON


By Andrew S. Erickson

In recent years, China has been building ships rapidly across the waterfront. Chinese sources liken this to “dumping dumplings into soup broth.” Now, Beijing is really getting its ships together in both quantity and quality. The world’s largest commercial shipbuilder, it also constructs increasingly sophisticated models of all types of naval ships and weapons systems. What made this possible, and what does it mean?

History and Drivers

China’s shipbuilding industry enjoyed early and inherent advantages that its aircraft industry, for example, notably lacked. Unlike most other sectors, its infrastructure could not be physically relocated far inland as part of Mao’s disastrously inefficient Third Front campaign. When Deng began reforms at the end of the 1970s, he prioritized shipbuilding to support the shipping industry, which helped carry foreign trade, underwriting several decades of rapid growth that has changed China, the United States, and the world significantly.

In 1982, China State Shipbuilding Corporation was formed from the Sixth Ministry of Machine Building. That same year, the Middle Kingdom made its first delivery to the international ship market. Abundant cheap labor and domestic demand buoyed Chinese shipwrights despite a ruthlessly competitive international market.

Shipbuilding’s commercial dual-use nature has long facilitated transfer and absorption of much foreign technology, standards, and design and production techniques. China’s shipbuilding industry has leapfrogged key steps, focusing less on research and more on development, thereby saving time and resources and enjoying themost rapid growth in modern history.

China’s current naval buildout dates to the mid-1990s, catalyzed and accelerated in part by a series of events that impressed its leaders with their inability to counter American military dominance. These include Operation Desert Storm in 1991, the Third Taiwan Strait Crisis in 1995-96, and the Belgrade Embassy Bombing in 1999.

Fleet Modernization

Ships are the physical embodiment of naval strategy—the most essential element through which a nation pursues its goals at sea. China has parlayed the world’s second-largest economy andsecond-largest defense budget into the world’s largest ongoing comprehensive naval buildup, which has already yielded theworld’s largest navy by number of ships. It is making big waves, ever-farther from its shores.

After shrinking to replace many obsolescent vessels with fewer but more modern vessels in the 1990s and 2000s, the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) is now improving in both numbers and sophistication. As China’s maritime strategy has evolved, so have PLAN requirements. In response to this major growth in perceived needs, the PLAN has taken on more warfare areas, with significant improvements across the board. In the 1990s, the PLAN did not have significant strike or air defense capabilities; now it does. To meet high-end, multirole requirements—such as area and point defense in layers—with more missions and greater capabilities, PLAN vessels have grown more sophisticated, and generally expanded. The larger vessels of China’s navy increasingly resemble those of its American counterpart.

Shipbuilding Strengths

Regarding Chinese shipbuilding advantages, it is difficult to obtain specific data. Numbers related to budgeting and process efficiency in China’s relatively opaque defense industry unfortunately remain very difficult to investigate precisely using open sources. The official statistics Beijing releases still do not even include a reliable breakdown for China’s service budgets—such as that of the PLAN—within the overall official PLA budget (itself highly controversial). Because of the lack of precise information available, estimating Chinese ship production expenses logically involves making assumptions about relative costs in comparison to those known for other countries—not an exact science.

Still, the larger dynamics are clear. China has the world’s largest shipbuilding infrastructure, and its development enjoys top-level leadership support, starting with Xi Jinping himself. Commercial production is price-capped in part by China’s relatively stable business and vendor base. It helps subsidize military production, an option closed to the United States given its paucity of commercial shipbuilding. Chinese shipbuilding is greatly facilitated by an unparalleled organizational structure for collecting and disseminating technology, and integrating it into development and production processes at an industrial scale. Moving forward, an important variable is the extent to which China can use its familiar approach of moving up the value chain and parlaying exceptional cost-competitiveness into exceptional quantity at sufficient quality.

China’s effort to exploit civil-military synergies offers both opportunities and challenges. This was vigorously debated by the contributors to the Naval War College China Maritime Studies Institute (CMSI)’s Naval Institute Press volume on Chinese Naval Shipbuilding. “Not a good mix operationally—colocation and coproduction are challenging if not counterproductive” was one of the more pointed critiques. Potential civil-military incompatibilities cited include culture, security, standards, design, engineering, propulsion, construction, and timescales.

Nevertheless, dual-use construction is undeniably emphasized in many authoritative Chinese industry policies and publications, and also in the form of a central commission for integrated military and civilian development headed by none other than Xi himself. There is certainly some intermingling in practice, with the greatest manifestation visible in shipyard infrastructure. High-tech, high-value-added, and high reliability commercial shipbuilding—for example, of liquid natural gas (LNG) and liquid propane gas (LPG) tankers, very large crude carriers (VLCCs), high-capacity container ships carrying more than 10,000 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEU), and even cruise ships—can be directly relevant to warship production in a way that building simple ships like bulk carriers is not.

Beijing’s prioritized military sector generally enjoys better funding, infrastructure, and human capital in the form of advanced personnel—such as engineers with long-term experience, as opposed to rapid turnover. The proof is in the pudding: the PLAN is “not receiving junk” from China’s shipbuilding industry but rather increasingly sophisticated, capable vessels. Its growing satisfaction with them is indicated in part by longer production runs of fewer classes.

A more specific question remains: what limitations on high-end capabilities plague Chinese-produced warships? For now, China faces substantial difficulties in fielding the largest, most sophisticated surface combatants and submarines, as well as remaining weaknesses in propulsion and electronics. These all involve complex systems-of-systems in which China’s preferred second-mover piecemeal integration of foreign and domestic technologies cannot offer a “good enough” result. China’s aircraft carrier program offers a prime example.

Deck Aviation Challenges

With regard to aircraft carrier development, China has come a long way but has still has further to go. The appeal is clear: these apex predators of the sea are also the most modularized naval system, one of the few ships that are relatively easy to upgrade over a considerable lifespan. But given difficulties inherent in improving marine and aviation propulsion, power, and launch technologies, an evolutionary “crawl, walk, run” trajectory seems likely for China’s aircraft carrier program.

This remains very much a work in progress: the PLAN is still “crawling” and not even “walking” yet. China has already shown that it can build decent carrier hulls. But deck aviation platforms are primarily a conveyance for aircraft-delivered payloads. And there is “no such thing as a free launch.” Payload delivery is essential to a fleet’s performance; so too is having infrastructure sufficient to support and sustain it. China’s first carrier, Liaoning, is designed for air defense, not strike. It offers a very modest extension of air defense: getting a Flanker-type aircraft like the J-15 beyond its unrefueled range from a land-based airfield.

The PLAN faces formidable challenges in such areas as electronics, maritime monitoring, and command; control; communications; computers; intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (C4ISR). All are often underappreciated due to their subtlety and ubiquity of employment, but are nonetheless essential for robust deck aviation operations. They may be less amenable to China’s preferred approach of copying and emulation than are simpler structural systems. Chinese personnel are improving markedly in their training, but need to become still more proficient in the hard-to-steal “tribal knowledge” of coordinating operations and using equipment, including shipboard electronics.

China-Aircraft-Carrie.jpg

China’s first aircraft carrier Liaoning is under restoration in a shipyard in Dalian. (AP Photo)
With far greater launching power than Liaoning’s ski jump, catapults will enable larger aircraft and payloads, delivering the PLAN to deck aviation’s “walking” stage. Deploying heavier airborne early warning aircraft will improve situational awareness. “Running,” as China perceives it, would require a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier with an electromagnetic launch system—the latter of which the United States is still struggling to perfect.

Carrier Group Assembly

China is gradually strengthening its ability to project significant power into distant waters by increasingly fielding the components of an aircraft carrier group. Sustaining a carrier group at sea requires replenishment vessels. Protecting a carrier group requires surface combatants with robust air defenses and offensive missiles as well as nuclear-powered submarines with potent anti-ship cruise missiles (ASCMs).

To improve at-sea replenishment, China is currently building theType 901 integrated supply ship, which can furnish fuel, food, and some spare parts. It remains limited in ability to transfer ordnance, its biggest difference from the U.S. Supply class. It is already more than adequate for furnishing air-to-air missiles for Liaoning. It could be refitted with more dry transfer stations to increase ordnance transfer capability—a useful indicator to watch for, which would suggest intent to emulate the United States in long-distance power projection.

As for protection and coordination, the Type 055 cruiser, if it has the command and control facilities described in open sources, will be the centerpiece of future Chinese carrier groups—able to organize other ships somewhat like a U.S. Aegis cruiser does. With 112 vertical launch cells (VLS), this large multi-mission vessel has more than double the missile capacity of any previous PLAN surface combatant. Its VLS loadouts of HHQ-9 surface-to-air missiles suggest great capacity for area air defense, its loadouts of YJ-18 ASCMs offer a significant anti-surface warfare capability, its loadouts of CJ-10 land-attack cruise missiles suggest a nascent potential for projecting power ashore, and its Yu-8 rocket-assisted torpedoes offer an antisubmarine warfare (ASW) capability.

5b3c0b97a31033495a585608.gif

China launches two Type 055 guided-missile surface warships at a shipyard in Dalian, Liaoning province. (Liu Debin for China Daily)
Most navies with aircraft carriers do not protect them with robust submarines, but if China is to approach the American gold standard that it so clearly admires, and to which it apparently aspires, it will have to improve its nuclear-powered submarines, which are needed to allow for a full range of long-distance undersea operations. Even with a towed sonar array, China’s 093A nuclear-powered attack submarine remains at a significant disadvantage in being able to detect, and if necessary, attack enemy submarines while remaining undetected itself. It is still primarily an anti-surface ship platform with torpedo-tube-fireable YJ-18 ASCMs and a relatively noisy reactor, particularly in the secondary loop. Major work remains for China to project distant undersea power.

Near Seas Operational Scenarios

Closer to China’s shores, there is limited value for Chinese carrier operations, given their relative vulnerability and the potential for a highly-contested environment. But China’s shipbuilding industry has already produced a fleet of several hundred increasingly advanced warships capable of “flooding the zone” along the contested East Asian littoral, including increasingly large amphibious vessels well-suited to landing on disputed features, if they can be protected sufficiently. This is also where China’s large, conventionally-powered submarine fleet can be particularly deadly. When several hundred easy-and-cheap-to-build ships from China’scoast guard and its most advanced maritime militia units are factored in, Beijing’s numerical preponderance becomes formidable for the “home game” scenarios it cares about most. And that does not even include the land-based “anti-navy” of aircraft and missiles that backstops them. In this way, Beijing is already able to pose aformidable military-maritime challenge to the regional interests and security of the United States and its East Asian allies and partners.

Trends and Implications

China’s naval buildup is only part of an extraordinary maritime transformationmodern history’s sole example of a land power becoming a hybrid land-sea power and sustaining such an exceptional status. Underwriting this transition are a vast network of ports, shipping lines and financial systems, and—of course—increasingly advanced ships. All told, this raises the rare prospect of a top-tier non-Western sea power in peacetime, one of the few instances to occur since the Ming Dynasty developed cutting-edge nautical technologies and briefly projected unrivaled maritime power across the Indian Ocean. Now, for the first time in six centuries, commercial sea power development has flowed away from the Euro-Atlantic shipyards of the West, back toward an Asian land power that is going seaward to stay. Military sea power may be poised to follow.

Beijing is pursuing a requirements-based approach:

The PLAN’s transition from a “Near Seas” to a “Near and Far Seas” navy is dispersing its fleet over greater distances, making it more difficult to protect and support, as well as requiring enhanced logistics and facilities access.

Some of the most important and challenging requirements include:

  • long endurance propulsion—especially nuclear power, the ultimate “gold standard
  • area air defenses for surface combatants and emerging carrier groups
  • land-attack and strike warfare, including from deck aviation assets
  • ASW
  • acoustic quieting for submarines, to help them both survive being targeted in deeper blue-water environments, and search more effectively without limitation by self-generated noise
  • and, finally, broad-coverage C4ISR
China has started to pursue all these objectives, but it will take years before it fully accomplishes them.

Already, however, Chinese ship-design and shipbuilding advances are increasing the PLAN’s ability to contest sea control in a widening arc of the Western Pacific. China is producing two to three surface combatants for every one the United States produces. If current trends continue, China will be able to deploy a combat fleet that in overall order of battle (meaning, hardware-specific terms) is quantitatively larger and qualitatively on par with that of the U.S. Navy by 2030.

Whether China can stay on this trajectory, given looming maintenance costs and downside risks to its economy as it faces anS-curved growth slowdown, is another question. It is a question that is linked to many other uncertainties about China’s future. China under Xi is becoming increasingly statist and militarized, thereby suggesting that naval shipbuilding will not suffer for lack of resources even as debt continues to spiral upward in state-owned enterprises. China’s very capable shipbuilding industry is closing remaining gaps with its Japanese and Korean rivals, even as Korean shipbuilders suffer unprofitability and rapidly-declining order books. However, China faces continued challenges in overcapacity and an aging workforce.

Moreover, a major mid-life maintenance bill for the overhauls of all new PLAN vessels will start coming due in the next 5-10 years. This will demand considerable resources—in money and shipyard space, with production and maintenance in potential competition. By then, China’s aging society may reorient resource allocation by stimulating “guns vs. butter,” and even “guns vs. canes” debates. The true long-term cost of sustaining top-tier sea power tends to eventually outpace economic growth by a substantial margin. For all its rapid rise at sea thus far, China is unlikely to avoid such challenging currents.
http://cimsec.org/chinese-shipbuilding-and-seapower-full-steam-ahead-destination-uncharted/39383

Chinese yards could build up to 15 cruise ships a year by 2030

As many as 15 cruise ships per annum could be delivered by Chinese yards by 2030 if all planning falls into pace, according to Raoul Jack, regional gm, passenger ship & ferry services, North Asia for Bureau Veritas and moderator of the 'Made in, and for, China' session at Seatrade Cruise Asia Pacific 2018.

‘With the growing Chinese middle-class population, consumer demand is increasing. People are looking for more diversified and high-end products for vacation and we believe cruise is a sunrise industry which could bring huge social and economic benefits to China,’ commented Nan Daqing, deputy general manager of CSSC, one of China’s leading shipbuilding groups.

‘It is not enough to secure ship calls and homeport operations,’ he added, ‘to build a cruise ship is the inevitable trend that China is already involved in.’

Two plus four newbuilds for Carnival Corp
In February 2017, Fincantieri, CSSC and Carnival Corporation signed a binding agreement for the construction of two cruise ships, with an option for an additional four, at Shanghai Waigaoqiao Shipbuilding (SWS) shipyard.

‘China needs to cooperate with global experts,’ said Nan Daqing. ‘To build and operate the first cruise ship built for the Chinese market in Shanghai will become a reality in the near future.’

The country took a big step forward when the agreement was signed to build the first cruise ship in China. Expert teams have been established to fully support the whole process,’ he shared.

‘We have established an experimental and development center in Shanghai to further support the cruise ship construction,’ said Chen Shi, director Shanghai Rules & Research Institute of CCS.

The first few orders in hand doesn’t mean China is completely ready for cruise shipbuilding, commented Chen. ‘There are lots of challenges China is facing to build cruise ships.’

Firstly, the development and research of cruise ship construction is not easy, we are not simply designing the ship, but developing it in China. We must work closely with the cruise line and the ship investor to make it clear on what they are expecting then we will be able to find the solutions. Secondly, we should not aim to capture the cruise shipbuilding market by the number of vessels we can build, but on quality as a cruise ship is quite different from a cargo ship.’

‘We can sign a deal to build tens or hundreds of cargo ships but we can not do that for cruise ships as they are unique,’ Chen continued.

Another obstacle of cruise shipbuilding locally is the lack of supporting facilities and related resources. China needs to build the supply chain for cruise shipbuilding and establish a full service pool. ‘We expect to establish a more matured supply chain for the cruise industry in China in the coming 3-5 years,’ Chen predicted.

Waigaoqiao and China Merchants Heavy Industries building cruise ships
Currently, China has two yards involved in cruise ship construction: Waigaoqiao and China Merchants Heavy Industries. The keel-laying for Greg Mortimer, SunStone Ships’ first Infinity-class cruise vessel being built by China Merchants Heavy Industries, took place in Haimen, in June.

Scheduled for delivery in August 2019, the 180-passenger expedition ship will be operated by Aurora Expeditions, Australia on a long-term, deck and engine timecharter.

The Infinity vessels, ordered by SunStone comprises a framework agreement for four firm orders and six options with partners China Merchants Industry Holdings, China Merchants Heavy Industries, Ulstein Design and Solutions, Makinen-Finland, Tillberg Design-US, SunStone Ships and SunStone Marine Advisors-Miami.

SunStone Ships has firmed an agreement with CMHI for a second Infinity-class expedition ship, scheduled for delivery in August 2020, and a third to be named Ocean Victory, arriving in March 2021.

China Merchants Group (CMG) which is capable of building river cruise ships for the Yangtze, is now cooperating with Nantong, Jiangsu Province, to develop a yard capable of building ocean cruise ships as well as othetr vessel types.

‘To meet the fast growing demands of China and the Asia-Pacific region, China Merchants is investing in the construction of cruise shipbuilding facilities,’ commented Wang Cuijun, evp of CMG.

The building of a cruise ship at Waigaoqiao Shipyard under the arm of CSSC has triggered large cruise ship construction in China, while CSIC, the counterpart of CSSC, is also looking for opportunities in cruise shipbuilding. ‘CSIC is picking suitable and qualified locations among many of its yards to develop cruise shipbuilding,’ according to Zhou Jianhua, md of Cosco Shipping Heavy Industry (Zhoushan).

John Hemgard, global marine director, naval architect & marine engineer, United Technologies predicted that Chinese yards will be able to build six ships per year by 2030, while Chen suggested output will be 5-7 believing the number to be ‘rational and reasonable’. Raoul Jack, regional gm, passenger ship & ferry services, Bureau Veritas, was more optimistic estimating the tally of between 12-15 cruise ships per annum ‘if everything goes on well.’

 
.
Actually according to Clarkson research, the premium shipping intelligence body, Chinese new build orders were behind South Korea's for the last year.

Not only that, these statistics are usually given in tonnage. China would be further behind in value since China makes the cheap and low quality ships, while South Korea makes higher end ships.
Bussard, I am in the industry, you have no idea what you are talking about. The whole FPSO, FLNG, semisub newbuild, LNG ships are moving en-mass to China. Almost all major EPC has got a tie-up with Chinese yards to win international projects. My Korean colleagues are all very bitter about the high end ships moving to China. Some were relocated to Qingdao and Yangtze delta. Only 3 countries make LNG ships competitively nowadays China, Korea, Japan. Japan is dead and concentrating more on licensing and the LNG tanks. China and Korea are the only two remaining competitive suppliers.

This is the project I am doing now. The cylindrical hull FPSO was first made by China using Sevan Marine design, at that time no yards took the challenge except Chinese yards, it was new and bold. Working with the Norwegians, we proved ourselves worthy and from that day on, all Sevan Marine hulls are made in China.

https://www.fluor.com/projects/shell-penguins-fpso
shell-fpso-con2.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
It's really funny that a man coming from a country with zero presence in the world shipbuilding sector laughing at the Chinese shipbuilding sector (with world's 1/3 new contracts, or total orders) and call it as "low quality / low end".

Look at the table. India's shipyards gets ZERO new orders in 1H 2018. Zero. How dare the guy coming from a country with zero competence in the shipbuilding industry laughing at China's???

upload_2019-1-28_14-26-36.png
 
.
It's really funny that a man coming from a country with zero presence in the world shipbuilding sector laughing at the Chinese shipbuilding sector (with world's 1/3 new contracts, or total orders) and call it as "low quality / low end".

Look at the table. India's shipyards gets ZERO new orders in 1H 2018. Zero. How dare the guy coming from a country with zero competence in the shipbuilding industry laughing at China's???

View attachment 535485
That's the reason why I always insult them, it's not because I hate Indians, it's because such a lowly slumdog country has got the audacity to even comment. If it was Koreans, Japanese or EU people, fine, they earned the respect and earned the right to critisize. Indian shipbuilding technology is very backward and efficiency is very low. Only Korean, Japanese and Chinese yard are in the competition for global high-end shipbuilding.

The same goes for semiconductors, we might be a generation or two behind but we do take a lot of effort to learn, absorb technologies and develop new technologies, including fabrication equipment. Korean and Taiwanese fabs can't make their own equipment even though they are ahead on process technologies. Yet Mr. Bussard is always commenting about how backward we are, Indians can't even make simple analog chips let alone high-end chips. Hell they don't even have a decent moderb fab, it's more like low yield lab projects on very primitive technologies.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom