Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No sir i am not enraged and neither am i abusing those police officers doing there job. In fact, i made it quite clear that anyone implementing the law of the nation have my respect but as i questioned earlier IS COVERING ONE SELF UP is actually a law as the beach is clearly not a nude only beach. Also if Burkini actually banned by a law and if so then i do question that law! NOT THOSE POLICE OFFICERS AT ALL as long as they were implementing law.@flamer84 @Arsalan @Zibago @SarthakGanguly @Roybot
I don't understand why everyone is outraged.
The police officers are here to enforce a local decree,and this woman defied the law.
She was given two choices ; Fined and leaving the beach,or fined and remove her burkini.
It was her personal choice to remove her burkini,the local police or the municipality aren't to blame here.
New Recruit
India should follow France and apply these laws on Muslims in India.....By the way Are Dalits allowed to pray in high class's temples In India?Good decision.
France is known for in-your-face secularism. I know it is a bit harsh for the devout. But that is France. Many countries allow burkinis (in fact most do). They can enjoy in those places. The Mediterranean sea is common to the entire southern Europe, Western and Northern ME states. France is a glorious exception in keeping religion out of public sphere.
India does not have the courage to implement an uniform law for all. We technically follow the Shariah law when it comes to Muslims.India should follow France and apply these laws on Muslims in India.....By the way Are Dalits allowed to pray in high class's temples In India?
Ok alright. You argued that those people who are outraging over this are the same who don't allow other religions space or call Ahmediyas non-Muslims. While i was not sure you were pointing out those people on forums or the ones in France. Because they are not same. While i agree with you that radicals Muslims on this forum don't support secularism. I have witnessed that myself and have always supported Ahmedis to have a right to ca themselves Muslims on this very forum. But since you came here to post only against the radicals especially about only Muslims and Hindus, since Christians can't be radicals according to you, it appeared as if you are indirectly justifying the ban for your hate against the Muslims. What solidifies that is, that although you say that you havn't supported the ban in all your posts, but then you didn't said directly that you don't support the ban either, rather you are more busy point fingures at others about not being able to comprehend your post. Intentions can't be comprehended, they can only be judged.Still haven't responded with facts I see . This going off tangent when you have no defense left is very old diversionary tactics and doesn't work with me .
Ok alright. You argued that those people who are outraging over this are the same who don't allow other religions space or call Ahmediyas non-Muslims. While i was not sure you were pointing out those people on forums or the ones in France. Because they are not same. While i agree with you that radicals Muslims on this forum don't support secularism. I have witnessed that myself and have always supported Ahmedis to have a right to ca themselves Muslims on this very forum. But since you came here to post only against the radicals especially about only Muslims and Hindus, since Christians can't be radicals according to you, it appeared as if you are indirectly justifying the ban for your hate against the Muslims. What solidifies that is, that although you say that you havn't supported the ban in all your posts, but then you didn't said directly that you don't support the ban either, rather you are more busy point fingures at others about not being able to comprehend your post. Intentions can't be comprehended, they can only be judged.
Anyone would assume you agree tht you are justifying the ban after your that post. And still you havn't talked about it yet. Its the proof, what else do you want .You have a lot of theories but no facts accept it and move on . When you cannot comprehend something try not to judge it. It's the very foundation of rational thought . Also, Just because I said Muslims and Hindus you jumped the gun about Christians and ASSUMED something in your head instead of asking . ASSUMPTIONS is the mother of all F*CK-UPS and that is what you have been doing here since the start . You have no proof, just another badly construed paragraph . Next time when you so confidently say something about me back it with facts not lame banalities and figment of your own imagination .
Last unwarranted advise from my side , when in doubt ask . It could have cleared all your self assumed misconceptions .
Anyone would assume you agree tht you are justifying the ban after your that post. And still you havn't talked about it yet. Its the proof, what else do you want .
Abusing and ranting won't make you right. Calm down, why so intolerant? I don't get it .Assumption is mother of all f*ckups . Its what happening with you . I would talk about it if you ask politely about my stance not when you assume and write novels over it on this thread .
Like I said next time when in doubt ASK .
They could have fined her. Forcing her to take her clothes off, that too infront of her kids and family is wrong on so many levels!
Abusing and ranting won't make you right. Calm down, why so intolerant? I don't get it .
Where's the abuse ? Another figment of your own imagination . Here's something to help
Good decision. I hope more and more Muslims start wearing Burkini and not be afraid of Christian radicals.Good decision.
France's highest court suspends burkini ban
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...nds-burkini-ban-in-test-case?CMP=share_btn_tw
-----